What Is Traumatic Separation?

You may have a memory of being separated from a parent when you were a child, even just for a few minutes. Maybe you lost them in a crowd or wandered a little too far at the store and felt panicked and afraid.

A moment like this might be among your earliest memories because the feeling was so intense, says Caitlyn Downie, LCSW, the Director of Trauma and Resilience at the Child Mind Institute. That offers some insight into the fear of a child of any age who is separated from a parent or caregiver in a more serious way. The effects of this stress are so powerful they can actually change the way a child develops.

A toddler whose mother goes to prison. A kindergartener whose father is detained and deported. A teen who is placed in foster care. These are a few examples of what experts call traumatic separation, a clinical concept based on the importance of the parent-child bond and the profound effects that can result from breaking it.

What is traumatic separation?

Traumatic separation isn’t a clinical diagnosis, but research shows that it can be profoundly harmful to kids. What makes it traumatic (as opposed to routine partings, like when an adult regularly leaves their child to go to work) is the character of the separation: ones that are sudden, unexpected, or confusing, or those that come about through larger distressing events, like a natural disaster or war. It’s not defined by the time spent apart — both short and long-term separations can be harmful.

Some common examples of separation that can become traumatic include:

  • Parental deportation
  • Immigration (e.g., forced separation at the border)
  • Parental military deployment
  • Parental incarceration
  • Termination of parental rights

Separating from a parent or primary caregiver can be distressing to a child even when it’s deemed necessary for their safety, as in cases where the parent they have been separated from has abused them, says Kimberly Alexander, PsyD, a psychologist at the Child Mind Institute. “There’s still a natural attachment that occurs. And the separation disrupts that relationship, even if it’s for the support and care of the child.”

Why is traumatic separation harmful?

More than eight decades of research has shown the profound developmental importance of the parent-child bond. This is the guiding principle of attachment theory, which was pioneered by a British psychologist who studied children who were evacuated during the Blitz, the aerial bombardment of London in World War II.

Here’s what the research tells us about the harms of traumatic separation:

It can disrupt secure attachment

Think of secure attachment as a “fundamental sense of security and safety” that a child feels with a parent or caregiver, says Dylan Gee, PhD, a psychologist at Yale University who studies how early-life stress affects children’s development.

“Attachment is the lens through which children come to know what they can expect from the world around them,” she explains. “Is this going to be a safe place or a dangerous place? This is foundational to a child’s sense of their ability to navigate the world. Traumatic separation can shatter that sense of safety.”

It can affect neurobiological development

Children’s brains are especially plastic, says Dr. Gee, constantly learning to understand their environment and how to deal with stress. “Trauma that occurs in childhood can be even more consequential than trauma that occurs later in life,” she says, and experiencing these disruptions in childhood can affect the way your brain and body are primed to react to stress later on.

But heightened plasticity is a paradox, she adds. “It confers more vulnerability, but it also confers more potential for resilience — children have heightened potential for supportive intervention and for healing and recovery.”

What do the effects of traumatic separation look like?

There are acute and short-term effects that are common across kids of all ages:

Sleep problems: “It’s often one of the first things that we see: nightmares, trouble falling asleep, or a lot of crying as kids are trying to fall asleep,” Dr. Gee says.

Separation anxiety: This might look like distraction, withdrawal, or clinginess because of fear of being separated from their new caregivers, Dr. Alexander says.

But signs may take weeks or months to show up. Dr. Alexander advises caregivers to consider the child’s baseline — their typical patterns of eating, sleeping, or engaging with others. “If they’re having more trouble with sleep, they’re eating more, eating less, they’re withdrawing or expressing a lot of worried thoughts three or four months later — that’s something worth getting looked at by a clinician,” she says.

Signs of traumatic separation at different ages

“Sometimes people ask, ‘Well, when is separation the most harmful?’ It can be extremely harmful at any age,” Dr. Gee emphasizes. But there are specific signs at different developmental stages:

Infants

Babies may not be as consciously aware of being separated from a parent as older children, “but they’re fundamentally aware that their primary source of regulation and safety is missing,” Dr. Gee says. Because infants are so reliant on caregivers for nurturing and sustenance, the separation “can be experienced as a threat to their survival.” That might look like “crying a lot or becoming withdrawn,” she says. “And at any age we can see intense fear.”

Toddlers and young children (3–6)

Toddlers and young children might become extra clingy with new caregivers or show regressive behaviors like bedwetting or baby talk. Regressive behaviors happen when kids are overwhelmed by stress and can’t express themselves another way, Downie says. “It’s like your nervous system goes kind of haywire,” she explains, “so it uses the body to signal that something is wrong.”

Similarly, kids at this age might act out more, throwing more tantrums, or withdraw. They might develop selective mutism, a condition where kids are too anxious or distressed to speak, even when they want to, in certain situations or with certain people.

School-age children

School-age children might act out or experience separation anxiety. They may also struggle to understand the meaning of the separation, why it happened, or who is at fault for it. Thus, kids at this age are more prone to magical or distorted thinking and feelings of guilt, thinking or saying things like, “I’m the one that caused this” or “This is my fault.”

The weight of these distorted thoughts or other worries, Dr. Alexander says, might make it appear as though a child is struggling to concentrate or that they’re disengaged or distracted. They might withdraw in a group or be averse to stepping outside of their comfort zone.

Children who are school age or older can also experience emotional desensitization — a kind of emptiness of feeling — Downie says, which can look like spikes in irritability, a lack of empathy, not smiling or expressing positive emotions, or an inability to relate to others.

Preteens and teenagers

“I’ve seen teenagers have a lot of mistrust with systems and be very oppositional,” says Downie. “Like, ‘I don’t trust you. I don’t trust my teacher. I don’t trust this child services worker.’” It might make sense that, say, a teen in foster care would be wary of the foster care system. But Downie says it’s often a larger instinct for anger and mistrust, one that extends beyond any specific entity or person.

The teenage years are also when kids are forming their identity, and traumatic separation can fundamentally alter that process. For example, a teen with younger siblings may step into a parent role, taking on new worries and responsibilities. Conversely, teens may become more reckless in a caregiver’s absence, putting them at risk for substance abuse or incarceration.

How to help kids separated from a parent

Adults caring for a child who has been separated from a parent — family members, foster parents, teachers — “can play a profound role in supporting their mental health and resilience,” says Dr. Gee.

Validate feelings

One of the most important things caregivers can do is be present as a child reacts to their experiences, especially if and when scary feelings come up. But be careful not to lead kids or assume they feel a certain way. “You don’t want to make something more distressing to a child if it’s not presenting itself,” says Downie.

If a child expresses guilt, or says something like, “This is my fault,” there are still ways to validate the feeling without endorsing the statement, says Dr. Alexander. You might say something like: “I can understand why that thought comes to mind and how difficult it is to feel that way. When you’re ready, let’s think about other possibilities to this situation.”

Create consistency and stability

One of the hardest things about traumatic separation is the uncertainty — Where did they go? When will they come back? What is happening? Giving kids some sense of consistency and stability can help them feel safe despite the unknowns. So as much as possible, help them stick to any routines: going to school, seeing friends, doing activities they enjoy.

Dr. Alexander advises focusing on things you can control — for example, shielding kids from potentially worrying discussions in a family where a parent has been deported.

“There would likely be a lot of conversations in the home about the situation, maybe a lot of watching the news, maybe making a lot of phone calls to attorneys,” she explains. “So where are you having those conversations, and can you have them in an area or at a time of day where your kid isn’t overhearing the discussions out of context?”

For young kids, it might be as simple as asking them to play in their room. For teens, it might be better to have certain conversations when they are out of the house and invite them to participate directly in others.

Be honest but reassuring

Caregivers might not have all the answers — like knowing when a child’s parent is coming back — but they can create a sense of consistency and stability in how they respond to kids’ questions, too.

Avoid undue reassurance (“Everything is going to be fine”) or over-promising (“They’ll be back in two weeks”) by focusing on what kids can expect, says Dr. Gee. For example: “What I can tell you is that I’m here for you, and I’m going to be with you until he’s back,” or “You’re safe with me, and I’m going to stay with you through this really hard time.”

Model handling stress

Children are sensitive to tone, Dr. Alexander says. “So, if you’re having really big emotions that are out of context for a child, the child is looking at these emotions and trying to understand what’s happening. ‘Am I in danger in this specific moment?’”

She says it helps to have conversations about these moments, especially with younger kids. “Like, ‘I know you noticed mommy crying. We’re feeling really big feelings, and this is how we’re going to deal with those big feelings. I’m going to take a break. I’m going to get a sip of water. Whenever you’re having big feelings, I want you to let me know so that I can help you try doing the same things,’” Dr. Alexander says, explaining the importance of naming the emotion and then teaching kids that there are ways of dealing with it.

Long-term risks of traumatic separation

The effects of traumatic separation can persist even after a child and their caregiver are reunited. Traumatic separation, like other adverse childhood experiences, puts kids at risk for a host of long-term medical and mental health conditions, including depression, anxiety, attention issues, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).

But Downie notes that not everyone who experiences traumatic separation develops PTSD. “Just because someone’s experiencing trauma now doesn’t mean that it’s going to become a PTSD diagnosis,” she says. “A lot of the behaviors that we’re talking about are normal and expected. There’s an adjustment period when a separation happens.” But if symptoms persist or escalate over several months, a child may need more serious support.

Treatment for a trauma diagnosis

While not every child who experiences a separation may receive a trauma diagnosis or require treatment, cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) — and the more specific trauma-focused cognitive behavioral therapy (TF-CBT) — is the “gold standard,” says Downie. TF-CBT is specifically for children experiencing trauma-related symptoms. An important component of TF-CBT is creating a trauma narrative, where kids create a story about what happened to help them process it. “But if you have a child who is not ready to process and integrate that trauma, you can’t force the pacing of the treatment,” she says.

In short, a good clinician will follow a child’s lead — even if that means just sitting in the same room with them to build trust. “People really need to feel like they’re being heard and that they can trust someone,” Downie says. Which is why a supportive caregiver or trusted adult can make a big difference.

“If people can take anything away from this, it’s that you want to make kids understand that that they’re not responsible for what’s happened and that people do care about them,” Downie says. “Kids are really resilient, and they can adapt in a good-enough environment. They don’t have to have everything to be successful.”

The post What Is Traumatic Separation? appeared first on Child Mind Institute.

ADOPT model combined with structured health education alleviates the preoperative anxiety of patients undergoing preventive ileostomy

ObjectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of the ADOPT (Attitude-Definition-Openmind-Plan-Try it out) model combined with structured health education in alleviating preoperative anxiety in patients undergoing preventive ileostomy for rectal cancer.MethodsThis is a randomized controlled trial. A total of 60 patients scheduled for temporary ileostomy were randomly assigned to either the control group (routine care) or the research group (ADOPT model combined with science popularization interventions). The research group received structured education via a multimedia resource library, including preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative care guidance, alongside interactive support from a specialized healthcare team. Anxiety levels were assessed with the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) at admission and preoperatively.ResultsAt baseline, no significant differences were observed in gender (P = 0.202), age (P = 0.052), or BMI (P = 0.798) between the two groups. Both groups exhibited comparable anxiety levels at admission. However, one hour before surgery, the research group showed significantly lower state anxiety (S-AI) scores and total anxiety scores compared to the control group (20 ± 0.48 vs 23 ± 0.37, p<0.001), while trait anxiety (T-AI) scores remained similar (p<0.05).ConclusionThe integration of the ADOPT model with structured health education effectively reduces preoperative anxiety in ileostomy patients, highlighting its potential as a standardized nursing intervention.

Barriers and Facilitators in the Implementation of the Systematic Medical Appraisal, Referral, and Treatment (SMART) Mental Health Digital Intervention in Rural India: Mixed Methods Process Evaluation Study

<strong>Background:</strong> An estimated 150 million people have mental health care needs in India, but only 15% are able to access care. Depression and anxiety contribute to a large proportion of mental morbidity. The Systematic Medical Appraisal, Referral, and Treatment (SMART) Mental Health trial used a mobile-based clinical decision support system for primary care doctors and community health workers (CHWs) to identify and treat people at risk of depression, anxiety disorders, and self-harm. A community-based antistigma campaign was also delivered. The intervention led to improved remission rates for depression and anxiety and lower stigma scores. <strong>Objective:</strong> A process evaluation assessed (1) implementation fidelity, barriers, and facilitators; (2) perceptions of doctors and CHWs on the use of SMART Mental Health; and (3) the causal pathways that led to trial outcomes. <strong>Methods:</strong> A mixed methods evaluation combining backend program data and qualitative data was conducted. A total of 38 focus group discussions and 37 key informant interviews were conducted with primary doctors, CHWs, government officials, local community leaders, and research project staff. The data were coded and analyzed using a framework analysis approach based on the UK Medical Research Council guidance on process evaluations and the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance framework. <strong>Results:</strong> The intervention had high implementation fidelity. Across clusters, the median proportion of participants with at least 1 CHW follow-up was 98% (IQR 96.6%-100%). The referral rate for a psychiatrist was low (224/1697, 13.2%), and only 23.6% (53/224) of those referred visited the psychiatrist. The median exposure to antistigma audiovisual content was 84% (IQR 65.7%-95.9%). At the community level, key implementation barriers included cultural inhibitions in seeking mental health care and the unavailability of patients due to competing demands. Proximity and tight social connections between CHWs and their communities were important facilitators in seeking medical help. Doctor and CHW training, mentoring, and feedback provided by program staff were important facilitators to support the use of the digital health components by the health workforce. <strong>Conclusions:</strong> A complex intervention that included both community-based antistigma and clinical digital health interventions achieved high implementation fidelity. Key areas to consider for maintenance of such interventions include (1) the need for sustained community-based strategies to address stigma and other cultural barriers; (2) health workforce strengthening policies, including supportive supervision for CHWs and doctors to increase capability in the use of mental health digital health tools; and (3) strategies to improve access to specialist care for those with more complex care needs. <strong>Trial Registration:</strong> Clinical Trial Registry India CTRI/2018/08/015355; https://tinyurl.com/5r63suxp
<![CDATA[Online tool personalizes antidepressant choice in primary care, cutting dropouts and improving 24-week depression and anxiety scores.]]>

PMAT enhances sexual dimorphism of fear behaviors and facilitates female mice’s generalized contextual fear extinction

Enhanced signaling of dopamine and/or serotonin during highly arousing situations can be reduced in part by monoamine transporters, such as plasma membrane monoamine transporter (PMAT, Slc29a4). An absence of selective pharmacological inhibitors means genetically modified mice constitutively deficient in PMAT remain the best tool for studying PMAT’s organism-level functional effects. Fear conditioning is a high arousal process. Generalization of fear is evolutionarily advantageous, whereby information learned from one experience is applied to other new but similar encounters. Pathological fear generalization, in contrast, is a core feature of most anxiety disorders. Given our previous findings indicating PMAT function reduces male mice’s context fear and enhances extinction of female mice’s cued fear, we hypothesized PMAT would similarly reduce generalization (i.e., enhance discrimination) of context and cued fear in male and female mice, respectively. Our context and cued fear conditioning experiments in adult PMAT wildtype (+/+) and heterozygous (+/−) male and female mice partially supported our hypotheses. We discovered PMAT facilitates extinction of contextually generalized fear, plus subsequent extinction of context-specific fear, selectively in females. Moreover, when specific fear cues or contexts were temporally presented before cues or contexts that were similar enough to make generalization possible, PMAT enhanced biological sex differences. Growing evidence reports common PMAT polymorphisms elicit measurable effects when PMAT function is reduced. Thus, we suspect future experiments may reveal positive associations between PMAT polymorphisms and risk for anxiety disorder symptoms, particularly in people assigned female at birth. Inclusion of these genetic variations in pharmacogenomic analyses may prove therapeutically beneficial.

“Failure to Launch” Syndrome: How to Stop Enabling Your Grown Child

When Zeke was in high school, he struggled with anxiety and substance use problems, and he left college after the first semester. Now 25, he is living at home, and his mom Carol is frustrated. While she’s pushed him to go back to school or work, he has only held one part-time job at a local smoothie shop and quit after a few months, embarrassed that high school classmates would see him working there. Another attempt at trade school to become an electrician also didn’t take — it didn’t feel like the right fit. Now he rarely leaves the house, stays up all night playing video games or scrolling online, and sleeps most of the day.

Failure to launch syndrome, highly dependent adult children, boomerang kids — there’s no standard term or definition, but if you’re a parent in this situation you recognize it. You are worried and frustrated about your adult child’s difficulty in leaving the nest, and you don’t know what to do because everything you’ve tried so far hasn’t worked. 

“These aren’t kids who come back home because they finished school, and the first job they get doesn’t pay enough for them to afford rent on an apartment,” says Theresa Welles, the Shapiro Family Director of the Bubrick Center for Pediatric OCD at the Child Mind Institute. “We’re talking about young adults who functionally have hit a wall, so to speak. They’re caught in a loop of dependency.”

What is failure to launch syndrome?

It’s not uncommon for adult children to live with their parents: According to Pew Research Center, 18 percent of adults ages 25 to 34 lived in their parents’ home in 2023, with young men more likely than young women to do so (20 percent vs. 15 percent). Young adults might leave home for a period of time and then move back in with their parents because they can’t find a job. Or for religious or cultural reasons, some adult children expect to live in the family home until they get married. Living at home is not the main criterion for determining a “failure to launch.”

While there is no official clinical definition, researchers who study this group of young adults generally categorize someone as a highly dependent adult child if they are:

  • Not in school, working, or actively looking for work (though physically capable of doing so)
  • Financially dependent on their parents for housing and other necessities
  • Emotionally reliant on parents (i.e., needing constant reassurance that they are okay)  

They usually have very limited social interactions other than online. Often, they have mental health challenges such as anxiety, depression, or OCD, which is a contributing factor, Dr. Welles says.

“They’re at the developmental stage of early adulthood, they’re figuring out who they are,” Dr. Welles says. “The fancy term in psychology is ‘individuation,’ but it’s essentially who you are, both as part of your family and separate from your family.” Highly dependent adult children haven’t made much progress in this stage for several years. Many of them want to change their life path and become more independent, but they struggle with anxiety or fear of failure and don’t follow through on the necessary steps. “Reliance on parents reduces opportunities to build autonomy, which in turn maintains that reliance,” she says. So, they remain stuck.  

Dependent behaviors and parental accommodations

Young adults who are highly dependent often fall into certain patterns of behavior. They don’t do their own laundry, cook, clean, or help out around the house. They rarely leave the home and often shut themselves in their bedroom or live in the basement, avoiding talking to others in person. As a result, they rely on their parents to act as an intermediary with the outside world, such as making doctor’s appointments. They might blame their parents for their difficulties in life.

While parents may not like the situation, they struggle to get their adult child to change. So instead, they accommodate them — especially when they are concerned about their child’s mental health challenges.

“In the world of neurodiversity, accommodations are a good thing — we want accommodations for testing and sensory environments,” says Natalia Aíza, LPC, the author of the forthcoming Anxious to Launch: Parenting Strategies to Help Your Adult Child Move On. “But in the anxious-to-launch world, accommodations are actually interfering with your child becoming independent.”

Aíza gives some examples of unhelpful family accommodations: You make sure there’s food in the fridge, don’t ask them to contribute to paying bills, and may give them spending money. When they get angry or upset, you accept the behavior and feel guilty, thinking you are to blame for the situation. If they are anxious when you aren’t nearby, you don’t travel because it causes them stress. Instead of expecting them to take steps to find a therapist, you do the legwork.

“The number one behavior of the highly dependent adult child is avoidance. I cannot emphasize this enough,” Aíza says. “If your child has a full-on virtual life, that’s their social outlet. They are avoiding real-life challenges. They are avoiding working at jobs that are unpleasant. They are probably avoiding adulting tasks that should fall on them at this point. So, we swoop in and take care of those tasks for them.”

A modern version of an old problem

While adult children have lived with their parents in past generations, researchers argue that phenomenon of highly dependent adult children is on the rise, and young people today seem particularly susceptible. Adolescence is more prolonged now in many cultures, and there’s an emphasis on finding a fulfilling career, not just a job that pays the bills.

Technology contributes to the problem. Playing video games, watching videos, scrolling through social media — “these activities don’t help matters because they can do things that feel like they’re accomplishing something,” Dr. Welles says.  

How to stop enabling your grown child

In Dr. Welles’s practice, she has worked with families where she initially treated the teen for anxiety or OCD, then involved the parents more deeply when the young adult had trouble launching. In one case, the son was in the habit of playing video games late at night and would sleep through class the next day. He had anxiety and depression, and his parents didn’t want to take away video games because it was the one thing he enjoyed doing. But they started turning off the Wi-Fi in the house at a certain time at night.

“It sounds so extreme, like he’s being punished,” Dr. Welles says. “But it’s about saying to him, ‘We’re going to pull back on ways we’ve accommodated that may have unintentionally made your anxiety worse.’” It was important that the parents validated his feelings, saying things like, “You feel like you’re in danger, as if you’re standing in front of a bear, and that’s really hard. But that’s the anxiety lying to you, and it won’t go away if we keep accommodating things that allow you to avoid what you need to do in order to overcome this anxiety.”

And tactics like these made a difference over time. The son is now attending college part-time and working as a server at restaurant. He has a girlfriend and has plans to save enough to move into an apartment with a friend.

Setting boundaries with your adult child

If the adult child doesn’t seem motivated to find a job, Aíza has recommended that parents take them off the family cellphone plan, giving them warning that this will happen by the next month’s bill. “This is not necessarily the most strategic financial choice” because it’s often much cheaper per person on a family plan, she acknowledges. “But it is a perfect first accommodation to remove because it is telling your adult child, ‘This is something you can handle. You can be responsible for it financially and logistically. It is something that I control, and I want to stop controlling parts of your life.’” And it’s often the motivation they need to find a job — something that can earn them $100 for the monthly cell phone bill is small enough that it feels doable.

When families take steps like these, the adult child will likely get angry or upset. “That’s hard. But think about when your kids were toddlers, and they wanted to touch a hot stove,” Dr. Welles says. “They were mad when you said, ‘No, you can’t touch that stove,’ but that didn’t mean you let them do it.”

“The good news is, generally speaking, even if there’s unhappiness in the beginning,” she continues, “pretty quickly, once they start to feel better and are doing the things that they actually care about, it can really help.”

Supporting without enabling adult children

Highly dependent adult children might accuse parents of not being supportive when they pull back on accommodations. Dr. Welles suggests communicating that you hear them and validate their feelings: “You can say things like, ‘Hey, I know this is tough or ‘I know that this makes you really nervous.’ But you combine it with the confidence that they can do it, like ‘I also know you can do it, as hard as it is.’”

Sometimes, you might think you are being supportive when you are actually enabling — like filling out a job application on behalf of the child. “Even if it works and they get an interview, you’re accommodating their anxiety,” Dr. Welles says. “But also, there’s going to be a point when you can’t do something for the child — the interview or the job itself — so the earlier that you can pull back the better.”

If your adult child has both ADHD and anxiety, you can support their executive functioning skills without accommodating the anxiety. “Maybe you sit down with them on Mondays and look at their schedule to help them determine if there’s a way you can help them organize, as opposed to you stepping in and letting them avoid things they need to do because they’re anxious about it,” Dr. Welles says.

Aíza encourages giving the adult child the minimum amount of help needed, to avoid creating another form of dependency. “It’s about noticing, ‘Am I working harder at this than they are?’” she says. “A lot of times the answer is ‘yes,’ and that’s a signal to back off and put more expectations on the child.”

Treatment for highly dependent adult children

While there is no standard treatment for highly dependent adult children, early evidence has shown a form of therapy called SPACE-FTL (Supportive Parenting for Anxious Childhood Emotions – Failure to Launch) to be promising. A variation on an effective treatment for anxiety and OCD, SPACE-FTL involves only the parents, since the adult child is often resistant to seeking help. The program helps parents reduce accommodations step by step and engage extended family and friends to help de-escalate conflict. 

One tactic is to make a plan to deliver a change in accommodation in writing — for instance, explaining that you will stop paying the cellphone bill at the end of the month and why. Doing it in writing (on paper or in a text) makes the message clear and helps you remain calm and non-reactive. If you are expecting an angry or violent response, they can ask a grandparent, uncle, or family friend be in the house when you deliver the letter, since that might make the response less extreme. The relative or friend may even spend the night if the adult child is more likely to cool off when others are present.

Asking for others’ help also helps you stop blaming yourself for the situation. “A lot of parents of highly dependent adults feel shame, but this is not something happening to only one family,” Aíza says. “We need to build on our social supports and get other people on our team so that we don’t feel so isolated in this process. Your adult child may be resisting change, but you don’t have to. It might sound cruel, but our central mandate as parents is making sure our child is okay after we’re gone. We brought them on earth to survive us — that is the design.”

Frequently Asked Questions

What is “failure to launch syndrome”?

“Failure to launch” isn’t a formal diagnosis but describes young adults who are stuck in a pattern of dependence. They’re typically not working or in school, rely on parents financially and emotionally, and struggle to move forward with adult responsibilities.

How can I motivate my adult child to become independent?

Change often starts with parents gradually pulling back on accommodations while staying supportive and calm. Set clear expectations, validate their feelings, and shift responsibility back to them in manageable steps so they can build confidence and autonomy.

The post “Failure to Launch” Syndrome: How to Stop Enabling Your Grown Child appeared first on Child Mind Institute.

Anxiety and Depression Associated With the Dependent Use of Generative AI in Medical Students: Cross-Sectional Study

Background: The growing integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in higher education has transformed learning processes but also raised concerns about potential mental health risks. Medical students represent a particularly vulnerable group due to high academic stress and increasing reliance on generative AI tools for study and decision-making tasks. Despite this, the relationship between AI dependence and psychological distress remains underexplored in Latin American contexts. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the association between generative AI dependence and levels of stress, anxiety, and depression among medical students. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted with 187 human medicine students from a Peruvian university during the first academic semester of 2025. The Dependence on Artificial Intelligence Scale and the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale–21 were applied. Negative binomial regression models, both crude and adjusted for sex, age, income, and year of study, were used to assess associations, reporting rate ratios (RRs) and 95% CIs. Results: Participants had a median age of 22 (IQR 19‐24) years, and 58.8% (110/187) were female. The median Dependence on Artificial Intelligence Scale score was 10 (IQR 7‐14). Generative AI dependence showed significant correlations with anxiety (ρ=0.336, 95% CI 0.22‐0.44) and depression (ρ=0.316, 95% CI 0.20‐0.43) and a smaller correlation with stress (ρ=0.277, 95% CI 0.16‐0.39). In the adjusted regression models, each 1-point increase in generative AI dependence was associated with a 5% higher expected anxiety score (RR 1.05, 95% CI 1.01‐1.09; =.01) and a 4% higher depression score (RR 1.04, 95% CI 1.01‐1.08; =.03), whereas the association with stress was positive but nonsignificant (RR 1.03, 95% CI 1.00‐1.07; =.08). Fifth-year students had significantly greater anxiety levels than their sixth-year peers (RR 1.82, 95% CI 1.09‐3.01; =.02). No significant effects were observed for sex, age, or income. Conclusions: This study empirically examined generative AI dependence as a distinct behavioral construct and its association with mental health symptoms in medical students. Unlike prior research, this study evaluated psychological dependence on generative AI and modeled its relationship with anxiety and depression using appropriate count-based regression techniques. By providing early evidence from a Latin American context, it contributes to the emerging field of digital mental health and medical education research. These findings underscore the need for universities to promote balanced and responsible AI use, integrate digital literacy with mental health support strategies, and develop preventive policies that mitigate potential maladaptive reliance on generative AI tools.
<img src="https://jmir-production.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/thumbs/63c5cab6261231002a3eb9a11707995f" />

Psilocybin-Induced Brain Changes May Explain Therapeutic Effects

Researchers at University of California, San Francisco and Imperial College London have shown that a single dose of psilocybin, the psychedelic compound found in magic mushrooms, causes likely anatomical brain changes that last for up to a month after the experience.

The study, involving healthy volunteers who had never taken a psychedelic, links temporary shifts in brain “entropy”—which is the diversity of neural activity occurring in the brain—to insight. This suggests the psychedelic trip itself is important to the drug’s longer term therapeutic effects.

The researchers found that a high dose of psilocybin led to increased entropy in the minutes and hours after taking the drug. The degree of entropy predicted how much insight, or emotional self-awareness, the participants felt the next day; and this, in turn, forecasted improvements in their sense of wellbeing a month later.

The findings may help to explain psilocybin’s therapeutic effects on conditions such as depression, anxiety, and addiction. “Psychedelic means ‘psyche-revealing,’ or making the psyche visible,” said senior author Robin Carhart-Harris, PhD, the Ralph Metzner distinguished professor of neurology at UCSF. “Our data shows that such experiences of psychological insight relate to an entropic quality of brain activity and how both are involved in causing subsequent improvements in mental health. It suggests that the trip—and its correlates in the brain—is a key component of how psychedelic therapy works.”  Carhart-Harris is senior and corresponding author of the team’s published paper in Nature Communications, titled “Human brain changes after first psilocybin use.”

“Psychedelics have robust effects on acute brain function and long-term behavior but whether they also cause enduring functional and anatomical brain changes is largely unknown,” the authors wrote. Psilocybin is the precursor of the compound psilocin, a serotonin receptor agonist. “Converging evidence supports a role for serotonin 2A receptor  (5-HT2AR) agonism in eliciting the characteristic brain and subjective effects of this and related psychedelics in humans,” the team continued.

For their newly reported study, Carhart-Harris and colleagues carried out an exploratory, placebo-controlled, within-patient study in 28 psychedelic-naïve participants who each received a single, high-dose (25 mg) of psilocybin. The researchers used an assortment of brain imaging and brain measurement techniques, some of which were carried out during the peak of the psychedelic experience, as well as before and one-month after drug administration. “This was an exploratory, hypothesis-generating mechanistic study in healthy volunteers,” the authors noted. None of the 28 people in the study had a diagnosed mental health condition, which gave the scientists greater freedom to do more testing.

In the first part of the experiment the subjects were given a 1 mg dose of psilocybin, which the researchers regarded as a placebo, and were then monitored with EEG, which records brain activity from electrodes on the scalp.  Over the next few weeks, the researchers measured their subjects’ psychological insight, wellbeing, and cognitive ability. They examined brain activity with functional MRI (fMRI) and brain connectivity with diffusion tensor imaging (DTI).

One month after the placebo, the subjects were given 25 mg of psilocybin, a dose capable of eliciting a strong psychedelic trip. During the experience, researchers again measured the subjects’ brain activity with EEG, and in the following weeks they repeated the same tests they had given after the 1 mg dose.

This enabled the scientists to compare the effects of the psychedelic trip on the brain and mind to the effects of the placebo. “The multimodal neuroimaging design allowed us to observe changes in brain function and (potential) anatomy from 1-h (EEG) to 1-month (DTI) after high-dose psilocybin,” they explained.

The investigators found that within 60 minutes of taking the 25 mg dose of psilocybin, EEG revealed higher entropy, suggesting that the brain was processing a richer body of information under the psychedelic. A month later, the researchers looked at their subjects’ brains using DTI, which measures the diffusion of water along neural tracts in the brain, and found that they were denser and had more integrity. This is the opposite of what happens in aging, which makes these tracts more diffuse.

The researchers cautioned that more work needs to be done to better understand the meaning of this finding, but the result is a never-before-seen sign of how psychedelics can change the brain. ”The inclusion of DTI enabled us to test for long-term changes in the integrity of white matter tracts post psilocybin,” the authors stated. “Results revealed decreased axial diffusivity in prefrontal-subcortical tracts 1-month post 25mg psilocybin.”

The day after the 25 mg dose, all but one of the 28 subjects rated the trip as the “single most” unusual state of consciousness they had ever experienced. The remaining person rated it as among their top five. The study participants said they had experienced more psychological insight after taking the 25 mg of psilocybin than they had after the 1 mg placebo.  The subjects also reported increased wellbeing two and four weeks after the study. This was measured from responses to statements such as, “I’ve been feeling optimistic about the future,” and “I’ve been dealing with problems well.”

As the scientists noted in their paper, “A predictive relationship was also found between brain entropy and longer-term mental-health changes—namely, improved wellbeing. Improved wellbeing could be predicted directly from acute increases in brain entropy as early as 1-h post dosing.”

A month after the study the study individuals also scored better on a test of cognitive flexibility.  “Psilocybin seems to loosen up stereotyped patterns of brain activity and give people the ability to revise entrenched patterns of thought,” said first author Taylor Lyons, PhD, a research associate at Imperial College London. “The fact that these changes track with insight and improved well‑being is especially exciting.”

The scientists found that the subjects who had experienced the largest increases in brain entropy in the minutes to hours after taking psilocybin were the most likely to have increased insight the next day and increased wellbeing a month later. The researchers concluded that improved wellbeing was driven by the experience of insight.

The authors suggest that the study findings could improve treatment for people with mental illness using psilocybin, for example, by ensuring that the right dosage is used to produce the right amount of brain entropy to promote insight. “We already knew psilocybin could be helpful for treating mental illness,” Carhart-Harris said. “But now we have a much better understanding of how.”

In their paper the team concluded, “The present multi-modal neuroimaging study in healthy participants sheds light on the brain effects of first-time high-dose psychedelic use and the therapeutic action of psilocybin-therapy, suggesting that therapeutically relevant changes—i.e., improved wellbeing—can be forecast via an acute human brain action, i.e., an entropic brain effect, that is well-known to relate to the psychedelic experience … Results support a role for psychological insight in mediating the causal association between the entropic brain effect and potentially enduring improvements in wellbeing.”

The post Psilocybin-Induced Brain Changes May Explain Therapeutic Effects appeared first on GEN – Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology News.

STAT+: Pharmalittle: We’re reading about RFK Jr. targeting antidepressants, J&J pushing an IBD drug, and more

Rise and shine, another busy day is on the way. However, this is also shaping up as a beautiful day as well, given the clear and sunny skies — and delicious breezes — enveloping the Pharmalot campus this morning. This calls for celebration with a cup of stimulation, and we are opening a new package of cinnamon buns for the occasion. Spring has sprung, after all. What is upon us right now, however, is our ever-growing to-do list. Sound familiar? So here are some items of interest. Have a great day, everyone. …

U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. announced several initiatives intended to rein in the prescription of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, the most widely prescribed class of antidepressants, which he has described as exceptionally difficult to quit, The New York Times writes. The initiative focuses on the most widely prescribed class of psychiatric medications, first-line treatments for depression and anxiety that include Zoloft, Lexapro, Paxil, and Prozac. In 2026. 16.7% of U.S. adults, or roughly one in six, reported currently taking one of these pills. The changes — new trainings, reimbursement mechanisms, and clinical guidelines — nudge clinicians to help patients get off medications, and to consider non-pharmaceutical interventions, like therapy, nutrition, and exercise.

A closely watched therapy developed by Johnson & Johnson failed to show a statistically meaningful improvement for patients with inflammatory bowel disease. But the company plans to advance the drug into late-stage testing, focusing on a growing subgroup of patients, STAT tells us. On Tuesday, trial investigators presented the results of a study that tested how well combining the drugs Tremfya and Simponi would stop the immune system from mistakenly attacking healthy tissues in the digestive tract. J&J tested the combined therapy in two Phase 2b clinical trials hitting both major forms of inflammatory bowel disease — ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease. In each trial, the combination performed better than the individual drugs, but did not meet the primary endpoint of clinical remission. 

Continue to STAT+ to read the full story…

Brief report: joint trajectories of anxiety and depression symptoms in an inception cohort of autistic youth

Background and AimsAnxiety and depression symptoms are common among autistic youth, yet little is known about the pattern and relationship of their trajectories from childhood into adolescence, a period of increasing social and academic demands.MethodsThis study used parallel process latent growth curve models to examine joint trajectories, including initial levels and rate of change in caregiver-reported depression and anxiety symptoms across age 7–16 within an inception cohort of autistic youth with varied communication abilities. We also examined autistic traits, sex assigned at birth, emotional reactivity and communication ability as potential predictors. Child anxiety and depression symptoms were estimated from Child Behavior Checklist Anxiety and Affective Problems subscales, completed by caregivers approximately annually.ResultsWhereas anxiety symptoms were relatively stable from childhood into adolescence, depression symptoms increased on average; significant heterogeneity of individual trajectories underlaid these overall trends. Findings indicated cross-sectional and longitudinal co-occurrence of anxiety and depression symptoms. Greater autistic traits and emotional reactivity correlated with greater initial anxiety and depression symptoms, but not their trajectories. Stronger communication ability correlated with more initial anxiety, but decreasing anxiety symptoms over time.ConclusionsFindings indicate group-level changes in depression symptoms and synchronous evolution of anxiety and depression symptoms in autistic youth across childhood and adolescence. This indicates the importance of joint monitoring of anxiety and depression symptoms in this period, with changes being potentially informative for early detection and intervention. Considering how anxiety symptom presentation may evolve across development may be a helpful next step to identifying at-risk subgroups.