Older Adults’ Experiences Navigating Setup of Digital Health Technology: Implementation Report

<strong>Background:</strong> Digital health and connected technologies may support better health outcomes among older adults, including those with multiple chronic conditions or low engagement in health behaviors. However, initial experiences with technology, including during unboxing, setup, and first use, can influence emotional reactions and perceptions and can ultimately determine sustained, meaningful use. Older adults with low technology experience or poor health may be particularly vulnerable to frustration, stress, or abandonment of devices when early interactions are negative. <strong>Objective:</strong> The purpose of this implementation study was to closely observe the initial engagements with a telehealth treatment app and connected blood pressure monitor (BPM) among a group of older adults with low prior technology use and reported low health behavior engagement. The goal was to identify setup “pain points” that may influence initial impressions and intention to use the technology over time. <strong>Methods:</strong> A total of 24 older adults (aged ≥65 years) were recruited for a 4-week trial of a telehealth app. Participants were provided with a box containing a tablet preloaded with the app, paper instructions, and a BPM and cuff. Researchers first conducted in-home ethnographic interviews with participants to observe the unboxing and setup process, documenting experiences with reading instructions, using the BPM, and engaging with customer support. Weekly check-in calls and a final exit interview captured ongoing experiences and likelihood of continued use. Interview recordings were transcribed and independently coded, guided by the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. <strong>Results:</strong> Most of the sample were White (20/24, 83%) and female (14/24, 58%). Negative experiences with the app’s customer support were the top challenge for participants, with representatives providing confusing steps or conflicting terminology. Other common challenges were understanding instructions, connecting to Bluetooth, and correctly using the BPM. While 67% (16/24) of the participants indicated that they were likely or very likely to continue to use the app after the study ended at the end of week 1, this number dropped to 54% (13/24) by the end of the 4 weeks. Participants who reported lower technology self-efficacy at the beginning of the study also experienced frustration, anxiety, and embarrassment as friction with the setup process continued. <strong>Conclusions:</strong> First impressions of digital health apps play a critical role in influencing older adults’ emotions and perceptions regarding the technology and may impact the likelihood of longer-term engagement. Those with lower technology self-efficacy are particularly susceptible to experiencing negative emotions such as frustration, stress, or shame. Mobile health apps and interventions targeting older adults should incorporate simplified instructions with clear, consistent terminology and well-trained customer support staff to improve the onboarding experience.

Curiosity in a Novel Virtual Reality Scenario and Its Association With Symptoms of Depression: Observational Pilot Investigation

Background: Curiosity plays a fundamental role in human learning, development, and motivation, and emerging evidence suggests that reduced curiosity is linked to poorer mental health outcomes, including depressive symptoms (DS). However, to date, the majority of curiosity research relies on self-report assessments and thus risks biased reporting. Virtual reality (VR), a novel tool increasingly used within mental health research and treatment, might represent a potent tool for offering ecologically valid insights into curiosity-driven behaviors while circumventing issues related to self-report assessments, including demand characteristics and recall bias. Objective: The study aimed to enhance the assessment of curiosity by using a novel VR environment and to examine its relevance to DS. Specifically, we tested 2 hypotheses using a novel VR environment: first, that curiosity, as assessed through spontaneous exploratory interactions and behaviors in VR, positively correlates with self-reported curiosity, and second, that VR-based curiosity is inversely associated with DS. Methods: This exploratory study used an observational design that included 100 volunteers. All participants completed self-reported assessments of DS and curiosity before engaging in a novel VR scenario. Although progression in the virtual environment required solving cognitive tasks, these were embedded as structural elements rather than framed as the primary objective. Instead, participants’ free explorations and interactions with objects formed the basis for the 4 curiosity metrics used in this study. After VR exposure, participants completed a questionnaire assessing cybersickness symptoms. Results: Hypothesis 1 was not supported, as only one curiosity metric, namely object interactions, was positively associated with one aspect of curiosity relating to motivation to seek new knowledge and experiences. Further, diminishing significance after correction for multiple testing warranted caution. Results relating to hypothesis 2 indicated partial support, in that object interaction was significantly associated with DS while controlling for age, sex, and cybersickness levels. Sensitivity analyses showed no associations between object interactions and self-reported anxiety and stress symptoms. Conclusions: VR may be a potent tool for assessing exploratory behaviors in a controlled, yet ecologically valid, environment that avoids issues related to self-report. However, whether such motivations translate to established curiosity constructs warrants further research. This study also provided preliminary insights into how assessing exploratory interactions in VR may be a promising avenue that could enhance the understanding of the etiology and assessment of DS—particularly its early stages.
<img src="https://jmir-production.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/thumbs/06feaae99f52819dbc4d7bb579c09298" />

Excessive Internet use and depressive symptom levels in adolescents with depressive disorders: chain mediation of social anxiety and sleep quality

BackgroundAdolescents with depressive disorders are at elevated risk for adverse mental health outcomes, and excessive Internet use has been increasingly linked to greater symptom severity. Therefore, this study aimed to examine the chain mediating roles of social anxiety and sleep quality in the association between excessive Internet use and depressive symptoms among adolescents with depressive disorders.MethodsA cross-sectional design was used. A total of 266 Chinese adolescents with clinically diagnosed depressive disorders (M = 15.79 years, SD = 1.85; 71.4% female) were assessed using the Internet Addiction Test, Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale, Social Anxiety Scale for Children, and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index. Correlation analyses and bootstrapping methods were conducted using SPSS and the PROCESS macro to examine the chain mediating effects of social anxiety and sleep quality.ResultsThe total indirect effect of excessive Internet use on depressive symptoms accounted for 65.66% of the total effect. Specifically, the indirect effects via social anxiety and sleep quality accounted for 24.10% and 26.51% of the total effect, respectively. In addition, the chain mediating effect of social anxiety and sleep quality was significant, accounting for 14.76% of the total effect.ConclusionExcessive Internet use was positively associated with more severe depressive symptoms among adolescents with depressive disorders, both directly and indirectly through the chain mediating effects of social anxiety and sleep quality. These findings highlight potential targets for preventing and intervening in excessive Internet use among this population.

Adverse childhood experiences and non-suicidal self-injury in adolescents: the roles of depressive symptoms and teacher care

BackgroundNon-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) has become an increasingly prominent mental health problem during adolescence and often co-occurs with depressive symptoms, anxiety, personality-related difficulties, and experiences of childhood trauma, forming a complex psychosocial risk structure. From a risk and protective factor perspective, the present study examined the associations among adverse childhood experiences (ACEs), depressive symptoms, perceived teacher care, and NSSI among Chinese adolescents.MethodsThe participants were 2,221 junior high school students from three schools in China. Data were collected using the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire, the Adolescent Non-Suicidal Self-Injury Questionnaire, a depression scale, and a teacher care scale.ResultsAdverse childhood experiences and depressive symptoms were significantly positively associated with NSSI, whereas perceived teacher care was significantly negatively associated with NSSI. Higher levels of ACE exposure and more severe depressive symptoms were associated with higher levels of NSSI, while higher levels of teacher care were associated with lower levels of NSSI. Moreover, among adolescents reporting higher levels of perceived teacher care, the positive associations between ACEs and NSSI and between depressive symptoms and NSSI were attenuated, suggesting that teacher care, as an external support resource in the school context, may play an important protective role.ConclusionsAdverse childhood experiences and depressive symptoms are important risk factors for adolescent NSSI, whereas teacher care plays a significant protective role in the school context. School-based prevention and intervention efforts should prioritize adolescents with high levels of ACE exposure and pronounced depressive symptoms, while strengthening teacher care to enhance protective resources. Future research should further explore how specific dimensions and timing of ACEs, trajectories of depressive symptoms, and multiple sources of social support jointly influence the development and maintenance of NSSI in adolescents.

OTX-202 Smartphone App to Reduce Suicidal Ideation Among High-Risk Transition-Age Youth: Open-Label, Single-Arm, Phase 1 Clinical Trial

<strong>Background:</strong> The transition from adolescence to adulthood (18 to 25 years) is associated with an increased risk of suicidal ideation and behaviors. Suicide-focused cognitive behavioral therapies (CBTs) have been shown to significantly reduce suicidal ideation and behaviors but are not widely available to high-risk individuals. Digital therapeutics could improve access to these treatments. <strong>Objective:</strong> This study aimed to evaluate the acceptability, safety, and potential efficacy of OTX-202 among transition-age youth (18 to 25 years) receiving mental health care outside an inpatient hospital setting. <strong>Methods:</strong> In this phase 1 single-arm clinical trial, 59 transition-age youth with recent suicidal ideation or suicide attempts used OTX-202, a smartphone app designed to deliver suicide-focused CBT, concurrently with usual outpatient mental health care. After baseline, eligible patients completed 12 weekly assessments of suicidal ideation, depression, and anxiety. <strong>Results:</strong> From baseline to week 12, participants reported statistically significant, large reductions in suicidal ideation (mean difference –5.1, 95% CI –6.5 to –3.7; <i>d</i>=0.95). In total, 3 (5.1%; 95% CI 0%-11.2%) participants reported suicide attempts. Reductions in suicidal ideation and suicide attempt rates were consistent with results from previously published randomized clinical trials of suicide-focused CBTs. Participants rated OTX-202 in the 97th percentile of usability and completed a mean of 9.0 (SD 3.5) of 12 app modules, supporting the app’s acceptability. There were no patient deaths, device-related events, or severe adverse events, supporting the app’s safety. <strong>Conclusions:</strong> Results support the safety, acceptability, and potential efficacy of OTX-202 for reducing suicide risk among transition-age youth. <strong>Trial Registration:</strong> ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06008132; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06008132

Timing of exercise differentially modulates fear memory and hippocampal neurotransmitters in male rats

Exercise promotes neurogenesis and enhances memory consolidation while reducing the retention of aversive memories and anxiety-like behaviors. While our previous work found that acute exercise alters neurotransmitter concentrations, including dopamine and serotonin, in a time-of-day-dependent manner, the long-term effects of chronically timed exercise on neurotransmitter dynamics and behavioral phenotypes remain unclear. To examine whether the daily timing of a chronic exercise intervention modulates its impact on neurotransmitter profiles and fear responses, male rats were conditioned using a Pavlovian contextual fear approach, then assigned to a 4-week treadmill exercise intervention performed during the early (ZT14) or late (ZT22) active phase or a time-matched sham-exercise control group. One day after completing training, rats underwent a context retrieval test in the middle of active phase (ZT18), and hippocampal neurotransmitters were quantified using UPLC–MRM/MS. Rats subjected to sham-exercise at ZT22 exhibited higher freezing than sham-exercised rats at ZT14, whereas exercise interventions at ZT22 selectively attenuated freezing. Histamine, acetylcholine, and GABA exhibited significant exercise × time interactions. Direct neurotransmitter–freezing correlations were weak after false discovery rate control, consistent with a network-level reorganization rather than a single transmitter driver. These findings suggest that vulnerability to aversive memory expression can be buffered by exercise, if timed appropriately, and that exercise reshapes hippocampal neuromodulatory tone in a circadian–phase–dependent manner, supporting the potential of exercise timing as a chronotherapeutic strategy to enhance stress resilience and mental wellbeing.

Tryptophan modulates the impact of prolactin on insomnia in perimenopausal women: a cross-sectional study

BackgroundInsomnia is highly prevalent among perimenopausal women and exerts detrimental effects on physical health, psychological well-being, and overall quality of life. However, its underlying mechanisms remain incompletely understood. This cross-sectional study aimed to identify factors associated with insomnia in perimenopausal women.MethodsA total of 187 perimenopausal women aged 45–55 years were enrolled. Insomnia, anxiety, and depression severity were assessed using the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7), and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), respectively. Serum levels of relevant amino acids and hormones were measured. Spearman correlation and linear regression analyses were performed to examine the associations among prolactin levels, tryptophan levels, insomnia, anxiety, and depression. Moderation analysis was further conducted to evaluate the potential moderating role of tryptophan in these relationships.ResultsSerum prolactin levels were positively associated with scores of ISI, GAD-7, and PHQ-9. Furthermore, prolactin levels were positively correlated with the severity of sleep-onset difficulties, sleep maintenance problems, noticeability of impairment, and sleep-related distress. Of note, serum tryptophan levels significantly moderated the association between prolactin levels and ISI scores (β = 0.227, 95% CI = 0.04–0.41, p = 0.0148). To wit, he positive relationship between prolactin levels and insomnia severity was stronger in perimenopausal women with higher serum tryptophan levels compared with those with lower levels.ConclusionsThe moderating effect of serum tryptophan on the relationship between prolactin levels and insomnia in perimenopausal women helps us understand the neuroendocrine mechanisms underlying perimenopausal insomnia and may inform future research on targeted preventive and therapeutic strategies.

Dissociation: Signs and Causes in Children

When people use the word dissociation, it can sound alarming. You may have seen it on social media, heard your child mention it, or noticed your child seeming “checked out” and wondered if that’s what’s happening. Dissociation can be confusing because it exists on a spectrum — from everyday experiences like daydreaming to more serious symptoms that may signal that a child is overwhelmed or struggling. The good news is that dissociation is often a temporary coping mechanism, and when it does become a problem, there are effective ways to help.

What is dissociation?

In simple terms, dissociation is a kind of mental disconnection. “When I think of dissociation, I think of there being some sort of disconnect between an individual and their sense of self, or a period of time that you later can’t recall, or feeling like you’re disconnected from your body,” says Lauren Allerhand, PsyD, a clinical psychologist at the Child Mind Institute and co-director of its DBT program.

Some kids describe dissociation as feeling spaced out, numb, or disconnected from their body or surroundings. Others say they feel like they’re watching themselves from outside their body, or that the world around them doesn’t feel real. “There’s some period of time where your normal sense of flow is disrupted,” Dr. Allerhand explains.

Is dissociation normal?

In its mildest form, dissociation is a commonplace occurrence. Kids might daydream in class, zone out during something boring like a long car trip, or feel detached when they are overwhelmed in some way. These experiences are usually not a cause for concern. “Our brains do a really good job of protecting ourselves,” Dr. Allerhand says. “Sometimes our brains develop strategies to protect us that are healthy, and other times they develop strategies that might work in short bursts but become less helpful if they happen too much.”

When dissociation happens often, or interferes with daily life, it may signal that a child is struggling with something more serious than ordinary, intermittent stress. “If it’s happening all the time, it’s less effective as a coping mechanism” because of the toll it can take when there is memory loss, confusion, and feeling disconnected to the self, she explains.

What does dissociation feel like?

Children and teens may describe dissociation differently. Some say they feel:

  • Like they’re in a dream
  • Emotionally numb
  • Detached from their body
  • Like they’re watching themselves in a movie
  • Like things around them aren’t real

“Kids might say they feel like a robot. Everything feels fake around them,” Dr. Allerhand says. “Younger children may not have the words to describe what they’re experiencing. Instead, parents might notice their child seems unusually quiet, unresponsive, or ‘not themselves.’”

Why do kids dissociate?

Dissociation is often linked to stress or overwhelming emotions — kids may dissociate when they feel unable to cope with what’s happening around them. “This could be a response to any sort of highly intense emotion or experience,” Dr. Allerhand says, such as:

  • Trauma
  • Anxiety or panic
  • Intense emotions
  • Depression
  • Major life changes
  • Overwhelming stress

“It’s another way of coping with stress or trauma,” says Tanvi Bahuguna, PsyD, a clinical psychologist at the Child Mind Institute who specializes in trauma and mood disorders. “There’s this psychological process that helps them disconnect from overwhelming pain.” Some kids dissociate during panic attacks or periods of intense anxiety. Children who have experienced significant adversity may be more likely to dissociate. These experiences can include:

  • Abuse
  • Neglect
  • Family instability (housing instability, domestic violence, addiction)
  • Loss of a family member, especially through violence or suicide

Still, experts are quick to note that dissociation doesn’t automatically mean a child has experienced trauma or has a serious disorder. “There are lots of exits on this highway before we’re at a dissociative disorder,” Dr. Allerhand says, adding that a full-blown dissociative disorder is very rare in children.

Mild vs. serious dissociation

It can be hard to recognize when a child is experiencing more serious dissociation because it doesn’t always look different from daydreaming or inattention. One key difference is distress. “Spacing out or not paying attention is not often experienced as distressing,” Dr. Allerhand says. Moderate or serious dissociation “is often somewhat distressing.” Kids who are daydreaming are still connected to themselves and their surroundings; kids who are experiencing more serious dissociation may feel cut off from their body, emotions, or reality altogether.

Using grounding techniques for dissociation

If you think your child may be dissociating, the most important thing you can do is not panic or try to get your child to “snap out of it.”  “The number one thing a parent can do is stay as calm as possible,” Dr. Bahuguna says. Speak gently, use short sentences, and reassure your child that they’re safe. Saying your child’s name and reminding them you’re there can help them reconnect.

Grounding techniques can also bring kids back into the present moment. One common method is called the 5-4-3-2-1 technique: Ask the child to name five things they can see, four things they can feel, three things they can hear, two things they can smell, one thing they can taste or imagine tasting. Other grounding strategies include:

  • Deep breathing
  • Squeezing a stress ball
  • Holding something cold
  • Gently moving the body

If you find your child often dissociates, Dr. Allerhand recommends helping them make a plan for it. During a calm moment, talk with your child about what they find helpful. “I noticed that this is happening. How can I help you when this is happening?” she suggests asking. Having a plan in advance makes it easier to respond in the moment — and in the meantime, stay nearby and make sure your child is safe until the episode passes.

When should parents seek help for a child who dissociates?

If dissociation is frequent, distressing, or associated with changes in your child’s functioning, seeking professional support is appropriate. “If something dissociative happens, and there’s a really big change in your child’s functioning, then I would be concerned,” Dr. Allerhand says.

Signs it may be time to reach out include:

  • Memory gaps after the episode
  • Noticeable personality changes
  • Difficulty at school
  • Withdrawal from friends or activities
  • Significant distress or confusion

A good place to start would be talking to your pediatrician, who may refer you to a mental health professional. “If your child is displaying behaviors that seem out of the ordinary, you should trust your instincts,” Dr. Allerhand says.

How to identify dissociation

To determine whether a child is dissociating, a mental health professional gathers information from multiple sources, including parents, the child, and sometimes teachers, asking about the child’s behaviors, history, and any recent stressors or changes in behavior.

“The first thing would be a structured diagnostic interview with a qualified clinician,” Dr. Allerhand explains. “Parents bring the history and describe the behavior, and then the clinician meets with the child.” Clinicians also consider whether dissociation might be a symptom of another condition, such as post-traumatic stress disorder, borderline personality disorder, anxiety (especially panic disorder), and depression.

“It’s really gathering history, meeting the child, observing the child, and figuring out what this cluster of behaviors leads to,” she says. It’s more frequent to find that dissociation is a result of another disorder than an actual dissociative disorder.

How is dissociation treated?

Treatment depends on what’s driving the dissociation. If trauma is involved, therapy may focus on helping the child process difficult experiences and build coping skills. Evidence-based approaches include trauma-focused cognitive behavioral therapy (TF-CBT) and eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR).

If anxiety or emotional overwhelm is the primary cause, treatment may focus on emotion regulation, grounding techniques, and identifying triggers and early warning signs. Therapy, such as dialectical behavior therapy (DBT), typically involves both children and parents, helping families recognize patterns and respond in supportive ways.

For more severe or persistent dissociation, treatment may happen in phases — beginning with safety and stabilization, then skill-building, and eventually, when appropriate, processing difficult experiences. “The goal is helping the child learn to cope with their experience and stay in their body,” Dr. Allerhand says.

What are dissociative disorders?

In children and teens, dissociation is usually a symptom of another condition. But in cases of very serious early trauma, abuse, or neglect, it can progress into a full-blown disorder. There are a number of dissociative disorders, including:

  • Dissociative identity disorder (what was once called multiple personality disorder) involves two or more distinct personality states and gaps in memory and is typically linked to significant early trauma. Parents who search online may find alarming information, but Dr. Allerhand says this condition is very rare in kids.
  • Dissociative amnesia involves gaps in memory that can’t be explained by ordinary forgetfulness — such as not remembering important personal information or periods of time — and is often associated with stressful or traumatic experiences.
  • Depersonalization/derealization disorder involves feeling detached from oneself, as though watching yourself from outside your body, or feeling that the world around you isn’t real.

These disorders sometimes attract media attention, but they are extremely rare in children. What’s important for parents to know is that if you see dissociative behavior in a child, it’s most likely a normal coping mechanism for a child experiencing some stress or intense emotion. If it persists, is causing distress, or is interfering with a child’s life, it’s time to consult a pediatrician or mental health professional. Identifying what might be causing the behavior is the first step to getting appropriate treatment.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is dissociation?

Dissociation is a mental disconnection from your thoughts, feelings, body, or surroundings. Kids may feel spaced out, numb, or like they’re watching themselves from the outside, as if the world doesn’t feel real.

What are common symptoms of dissociation?

Common signs include feeling detached from the body, emotionally numb, or like you’re in a dream. Some kids seem unusually quiet or “not themselves,” while others have trouble recalling what happened during that time.

What causes dissociation?

Dissociation is often a response to stress, anxiety, or overwhelming emotions. It can also be linked to trauma, major life changes (such as the sudden loss of a family member), or intense feelings the child doesn’t yet know how to manage.

How can you stop dissociating?

Grounding techniques can help bring you back to the present moment, like naming what you see, hear, and feel, or focusing on breathing. Having a plan for what you will do the next time can make it easier to manage when it happens.

The post Dissociation: Signs and Causes in Children appeared first on Child Mind Institute.

<![CDATA[Lifestyle medicine pillars help reshape depression and anxiety treatment in psychiatry.]]>

Effects of bifrontal-transcranial direct current stimulation combined with music listening on sleep quality, cortical activation and functional connectivity in patients with insomnia: a randomised controlled trial by fNIRS

BackgroundAlthough music listening and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) alone have certain effects in the treatment of insomnia, the sleep regulatory effects and neural mechanisms of the combined treatment in patients with insomnia disorder (ID) are unclear. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of combined bifrontal-tDCS (F3: anode, F4: cathode) with music listening in patients with ID using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS).Methods76 ID patients were randomly divided into an intervention group (n=38) and a control group (n=38), and received 4 weeks of a total of 20 sessions of music + tDCS therapy and music + sham tDCS therapy (30-second stimulation with fade-in/fade-out to mimic somatic sensations), respectively. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index Scale (PSQI), Self-rating Depression Scale (SDS), Self-rating Anxiety Scale (SAS), and Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-14) were compared between the two groups before and after treatment. Oxy-haemoglobin (HbO2) concentration and functional connectivity (FC) were assessed during the verbal fluency task using fNIRS.ResultsCompared with the control group, the PSQI total score (mean difference: -2.57 points, 95% CI: -4.43 to -0.71, p = 0.001), PSQI sub-scores except “sleep disturbance and daytime dysfunction”, SDS and SAS scores of the intervention group improved significantly after treatment. It was observed by fNIRS that the HbO2 concentration in the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC), left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), right ventrolateral prefrontal cortex, and right superior frontal cortex (SFC) increased significantly after treatment in the intervention group but was not superior to the control group. In addition, the FC enhancement of left SFC-left DLPFC and left SFC-mPFC after treatment was significantly better in the intervention group than in the control group, and the PSQI improvement was positively correlated with the FC enhancement of channel-averaged and left SFC-right DLPFC.ConclusionsCombining bifrontal-tDCS with music listening is more helpful in improving sleep quality and prefrontal functional connectivity in ID patients compared with music listening alone. For ID patients, music electrical stimulation headphones may be a safe, effective, and convenient new treatment strategy.Clinical trial registrationhttps://www.chictr.org.cn/, identifier ChiCTR2400086233.