Effect of pharyngeal musculature and genioglossus exercising on obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome following uvulopalatopharyngoplasty
Retrospective evaluation of transcranial magnetic stimulation for enhancing arousal in patients with minimally conscious state: a single-centre study in Inner Mongolia, China
At-Home Sleep Electroencephalography Assessment in Young and Older Adults Using a Novel Wireless Soft Electronics Sleep Monitoring System: Experimental Study
Background: Sleep quality declines with age and is a known contributor to multiple chronic health conditions, including Alzheimer disease. Emerging evidence suggests that certain electroencephalography (EEG) neural signatures measured during sleep may be predictive of cognitive decline in older adults. Sleep EEG signals are traditionally measured using bulky, rigid, and uncomfortable equipment in an unfamiliar laboratory setting, which can negatively impact sleep signals. Due to these limitations, sleep EEG data acquisition is typically limited to a single night. Objective: This study aimed to validate our recently developed portable, skin-like EEG monitoring patch for 7 nights in the home environment in a pilot sample of young and older adults by evaluating usability and acceptance, and replicating age-related differences in sleep architecture observed in the polysomnography literature. Methods: Eighteen young adults and 18 cognitively unimpaired older adults without sleep disorders were enrolled (data from 11 young adults and 12 older adults were included in the analyses) in a 7-night study during which they wore novel, gel-free, wireless, ultrathin, skin-conforming, sleep monitoring, fabric-based patches. These patches were self-applied to the forehead and face for optimal usability and comfort. The patches incorporate laser-cut mesh electrodes with low-profile electronics (including a rechargeable battery and amplifier) and transmit EEG signals to a participant-controlled, Bluetooth-enabled, tablet-based data acquisition app. An automated algorithm was used to stage sleep and assess microarchitecture features from the EEG commonly impacted for each participant. Averages across nights were computed for these sleep features for each participant. Results: Young and older adults reported that the sleep patch was easy to use and comfortable to wear. There was no loss of signal power over 7 nights of wear across participants (retained-data signal-to-noise ratio over the 7-d period: young adult, mean 20.69, SD 12.78, maximum 52.13, minimum 5.19; older adult, mean 22.10, SD 9.39, maximum 49.96, minimum 13.79). Most datasets not retained were lost due to poor reference electrode adhesion on the nose (75/101, 74% of lost datasets in young adults and 57/88, 65% in older adults). Trained sleep technologists verified that the retained datasets were of sufficient quality to be scored without difficulty. Expected age-group differences in sleep features were observed, including age-related reductions in stage N3 sleep (young adult, mean 18.55, SD 6.70; older adult, mean 10.40, SD 6.43; Mann-Whitney =42.0; =.01) and reduced sleep spindle density (young adult, mean 2.92, SD 2.24; older adult, mean 0.94, SD 1.33; Mann-Whitney =45.0; =.006). Conclusions: This study demonstrates that our novel, comfortable, wearable patch can reliably measure physiological sleep data over multiple nights at home in adults across the lifespan, thereby making multinight sleep assessment in cognitive aging studies and clinical research more accessible than traditional polysomnography. In future studies, the small, lightweight system, which is highly scalable, can be shipped inexpensively to participants’ homes, making this technology and research accessible to individuals who may have difficulty traveling or who are hesitant to travel to a laboratory or clinic.
<img src="https://jmir-production.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/thumbs/f4ea760567524def38133c78b1f4dc26" />
Tailoring AI solutions for health care needs
The AI market is full of big promises of grand transformation. Health care is a prime target for those promises, beset as it is by financial pressures, labor shortages, and the growing burden of caring for an aging population. AI developers are targeting functions that vary widely, from curing cancer and performing surgery to streamlining routine administrative tasks.

The opportunity is genuine, but execution can be difficult. Numerous software vendors have tried to “fix” health care challenges but failed because they misunderstood the environment. “Health care is very complex,” says Steve Bethke, vice president of the solution developer market for Mayo Clinic Platform, which supports the buildout and deployment of digital solutions for health care companies through data-based insights and expert validation. “Solution developers must have a deep focus on clinical and technical capabilities, and then align their solutions to the relevant business impacts. If they miss any dimension, the solution will not be adopted or drive value.”
AI applications for health care are proliferating rapidly. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has approved more than 1,300 AI-enabled medical devices, mostly for interpreting diagnostic images. More than half of these were approved in the past three years, with the earliest dating as far back as 1995. Non-radiological applications carry out tasks as diverse as tracking sleep apnea, analyzing heart rhythms, and planning orthopedic surgeries.
AI applications that do not count as medical devices— for example, those that handle scheduling and administrative tasks—are more difficult to track but are also rapidly increasing. AI can help coordinate complex tasks and workflows that are often conventionally managed by whiteboards and sticky notes. Such functions may well outstrip clinical uses in their impact on health systems. A recent survey of technology leaders found that 72% said their top priority for AI was reducing caregiver burden and improving caregiver satisfaction, while over half (53%) cited workflow efficiency and productivity.

Any health care-related application can potentially impact patient care, whether directly or indirectly, and AI apps that are poorly designed or inadequately trained and validated can put patients at risk. Providers recognize that risk: In the same survey, 77% said immature AI tools are a significant barrier to adoption. Regulators and lawmakers are also keeping an eye on the risks as development and adoption burgeon, though the U.S. regulatory picture is still in flux, as a 2024 report to Congress on AI in health care observes.
To tackle some of the technical challenges, many health care providers are partnering with application developers to build AI solutions. In a recent study, McKinsey found that 61% of health care organizations intend to pursue partnerships with third-party vendors to develop customized generative AI solutions as a primary strategy as opposed to building them in-house or buying off-the-shelf products.
But health care-specific AI applications must also be tailored to the nuanced clinical needs of medical providers as well as the complex business and regulatory considerations of the wider sector. This is where developers can benefit from working with a partner with a deep understanding of the health care environment to tailor applications to what providers want and need most. Doing so helps to position AI products for maximum impact and value, avoiding the pitfalls unique to the health care environment.
This content was produced by Insights, the custom content arm of MIT Technology Review. It was not written by MIT Technology Review’s editorial staff. It was researched, designed, and written by human writers, editors, analysts, and illustrators. This includes the writing of surveys and collection of data for surveys. AI tools that may have been used were limited to secondary production processes that passed thorough human review.
Excessive Internet use and depressive symptom levels in adolescents with depressive disorders: chain mediation of social anxiety and sleep quality
Distinct sleep-disordered breathing phenotypes in elderly patients with depressive disorder: links to hypoxemia severity and inflammatory burden
Data-Driven Tool Identifies Individuals at Highest Risk of Obesity-Related Disease
A new clinical risk model may transform how obesity is managed, by identifying which individuals are most likely to develop serious complications, regardless of their body mass index (BMI).
Developed by researchers at Queen Mary University of London and the Berlin Institute of Health, the tool, called OBSCORE, uses just 20 routinely collected clinical variables to predict the future risk of 18 obesity-related conditions, ranging from type 2 diabetes to cardiovascular disease.
Published in Nature Medicine, the study challenges the long-standing reliance on BMI as the primary metric for assessing obesity-related health risk.
Moving beyond BMI
BMI has long served as a simple proxy for obesity, but it fails to capture the biological heterogeneity of patients. Two individuals with similar BMI can have vastly different risks of developing complications.
The new model addresses this limitation directly. As described in the study, it “provides information beyond BMI” by integrating multiple dimensions of health into a unified risk score.
These include demographic data, clinical biomarkers, disease history, and lifestyle factors, variables already commonly available in healthcare settings.
The findings show that BMI alone is a poor discriminator of risk. The model consistently outperformed BMI-based approaches across all tested outcomes.
Large-scale data enables precision risk prediction
To build the model, researchers analyzed health data from nearly 200,000 individuals with overweight or obesity from the UK Biobank.
Using an interpretable machine learning framework, they screened more than 2,000 potential predictors and distilled them into a core set of 20 features that best predicted long-term health outcomes.
The resulting OBSCORE model estimates the 10-year risk of developing 18 conditions, including cardiovascular disease, kidney disease, sleep apnea, and metabolic disorders.
The model demonstrated strong predictive performance, with median concordance indices around 0.75 across outcomes, indicating robust discrimination between high- and low-risk individuals.
Hidden high-risk individuals
One of the most striking findings is that high-risk individuals are not always those with the highest BMI.
A substantial proportion of individuals classified as high risk fell into the “overweight” category (BMI 27–30 kg/m²), rather than obesity. In some outcomes, up to ~40% of those in the highest risk group had BMI below the obesity threshold.
This reveals a critical gap in current clinical practice: individuals who may benefit from intervention could be overlooked simply because they do not meet BMI-based criteria.
On the other hand, some individuals with obesity may have relatively low risk and may not require intensive intervention.
Strong risk stratification across diseases
Beyond prediction, the scientists believe that OBSCORE enables meaningful risk stratification. Individuals in the highest risk group showed dramatically higher rates of disease compared to those in the lowest group.
For example, the study reports:
- Up to 89-fold higher risk for chronic kidney disease
- 42-fold higher risk for type 2 diabetes
- 47-fold higher risk for cardiovascular mortality
These differences exceed those observed when comparing individuals based solely on BMI categories, underscoring the added value of multidimensional risk assessment.
Clinical and healthcare implications
The implications of these findings are significant, particularly in the context of emerging obesity therapies.
Highly effective drugs such as GLP-1 receptor agonists and dual incretin therapies have transformed treatment options, but their high cost and limited availability make patient prioritization essential.
As the authors note, current systems lack robust frameworks to identify which patients should receive treatment.
OBSCORE offers a potential solution by enabling risk-based allocation of interventions, ensuring that treatment is directed toward those most likely to benefit.
This could improve clinical outcomes while optimizing healthcare resource use.
Toward implementation in clinical practice
One of the key strengths of OBSCORE is its practicality. Unlike many predictive models, it relies on a small number of variables that are already routinely collected, making it suitable for integration into electronic health records.
The researchers envision the model being used as a decision-support tool in clinical settings, complementing rather than replacing existing frameworks.
External validation in independent cohorts—including populations of different ancestry, demonstrated strong generalizability, further supporting its potential for real-world deployment.
Limitations and next steps
Despite its promise, the model requires further validation in broader populations, including younger individuals and more diverse healthcare settings.
Additionally, while OBSCORE effectively stratifies risk, translating these predictions into actionable treatment thresholds will require clinical consensus and cost-effectiveness analyses.
The authors also emphasize that the model identifies predictive, not necessarily causal, factors, and should be interpreted accordingly.
Taken together, the findings mark a shift toward precision medicine in obesity, moving from simplistic metrics like BMI to data-driven, individualized risk assessment.
By capturing the complex interplay of metabolic, clinical, and behavioral factors, OBSCORE could enable earlier intervention, better targeting of therapies, and improved long-term outcomes for patients living with overweight and obesity.
The post Data-Driven Tool Identifies Individuals at Highest Risk of Obesity-Related Disease appeared first on Inside Precision Medicine.

