STAT+: Legislatures in Colorado and Virginia resist moves to constrain drug affordability boards

Legislators in two states have resisted efforts to restrict prescription drug affordability boards, the controversial panels that are designed to function as rate-setting authorities and place limits on the cost of prescription medicines.

In Virginia, the General Assembly unanimously rejected a move by Gov. Abigail Spanberger (D) to delay a key provision of two bills that would create a board and allow it to place price caps that mirror the negotiated prices paid by Medicare. Spanberger must now either accept or veto the legislation as originally intended.

In Colorado, the House Health and Human Services Committee postponed consideration of a bill that would exempt orphan drugs, which are used to treat rare diseases, from pricing caps that might be pursued by the state board. By delaying action until the end of the legislative session, the bill is effectively dead.

Continue to STAT+ to read the full story…

How Geospatial Science is Reshaping Cancer Epidemiology: Three Perspectives from the Front Lines

The intersection of geography and oncology is no longer a speculative frontier—it is rapidly becoming the new standard in understanding who gets cancer, who survives it, and why. At a recent session at AACR 2026 bringing together leading researchers from the Fred Hutch Cancer Center, Harvard, and UCSF, the consensus was clear: geospatial methods are fundamentally altering how epidemiologists interrogate the cancer continuum, from incidence to mortality, from prevention to palliative care.

Trang VoPham, PhD, from Fred Hutch opened proceedings with a sweeping overview of how location data is being weaponized against cancer disparities. Her team’s work exemplifies the field’s evolution beyond crude ecological fallacies toward granular, individual-level exposure assessment. “We linked geospatial data on agricultural pesticide operations with all death certificates in the U.S. from 1989 to 2023,” she explained, detailing their findings that higher linuron use correlated with a 16% increased risk of colorectal cancer mortality among under-50s—higher than the 11% seen in older populations. The precision matters: “It is absolutely critical… can you access or generate residential address histories, not just baseline, not just at diagnosis, to consider life course exposures, timing of exposures, during relevant and critical time periods?”

Trang VoPham, PhD, Fred Hutch Cancer Center

VoPham’s lab is already translating these insights into population health interventions. Their GeoXMap web application—developed with community advisory boards across Washington State—enables neighborhood-level mapping of over 175 health variables, each paired with actionable mitigation strategies. “When you map radon, you can click on the tips button and see strategies for exposure mitigation, like where to get free radon test kits,” she noted. During 2023’s wildfire season, her team used Epic electronic health records to identify and contact 64,000 high-risk patients, resulting in over 4,000 same-day virtual primary care appointments. “This approach could absolutely be scaled to target other populations… to empower high-risk patients with information to help protect themselves from environmental hazards.”

Jaime Hart, ScD, from Harvard, shifted focus to the atmospheric dimensions of cancer risk, tracing how air pollution research has matured since IARC’s 2013 carcinogen declaration. She noted that evidence at the time was largely restricted to lung cancer data. Today, the picture has broadened considerably. Hart highlighted recent consortium work linking traffic-related nitrogen dioxide with premenopausal and Black women’s breast cancer risk—”mostly being driven by premenopausal breast cancer and breast cancer among Black women and non-Hispanic white women”—while PM2.5 associations remain more equivocal for this site.

Jaime Hart, ScD, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health

The mechanistic sophistication has advanced in parallel. Hart detailed how particulate matter can “translocate across your lungs, get into your circulation and deposit in every tissue in your body,” even ascending the nasal pathway to breach the blood-brain barrier. Her collaboration with VoPham on wildfire-specific PM2.5 revealed that “even for the same increase in air pollution exposure… if that PM2.5 is coming more from wildfires than not, you saw an elevated risk,” suggesting source-specific toxicity profiles that carry profound regulatory implications.

Iona Cheng, PhD, from University of California, San Francisco, anchored the session in the structural determinants that underlie these spatial patterns. Her work on redlining—historical mortgage discrimination encoded into contemporary health disparities—demonstrates how geospatial tools can excavate systemic injustice. “In Detroit… about 70% [of non-Hispanic white men with prostate cancer] do live in an area that has not been redlined, in contrast to about 30%,” she reported, whereas “almost 60%” of African American patients resided in the most heavily denied neighborhoods. The mortality gradient was stark: “Higher prostate cancer mortality, or lower survival, associated with living in neighborhoods with more redlining, for both Black and white men.”

Iona Cheng, PhD, University of California, San Francisco

Cheng emphasized that these are not proxy measures for individual behavior but independent contextual effects. “We do see that the neighborhood itself has contributions,” she said, describing how her team is developing racially-ethnic-specific composite indices of structural racism across housing, education, employment, and judicial domains. The community-engaged methodology proved essential: working with Hawaiian advisory boards revealed that non-Hispanic white reference groups made little demographic sense for the islands, prompting recalibration.

The session closed with a palpable sense of acceleration. From Google’s nascent geospatial reasoning AI to wearable sensor validation of satellite models; from street-view imagery classifying 350 million U.S. locations to ecological momentary assessment tracking real-time exposures, the toolkit is expanding exponentially. As Hart observed: “The places where we live, work, and play influence our risk of cancer, impose diagnostic outcomes. There are robust biological mechanisms that underlie this.” The geospatial revolution in cancer epidemiology, it seems, is only getting started.

The post How Geospatial Science is Reshaping Cancer Epidemiology: Three Perspectives from the Front Lines appeared first on Inside Precision Medicine.

AACR 2026 Video Update: Cancer Research Edges Toward an AI-Driven Era

SAN DIEGO – At the American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) Annual Meeting 2026, the conversation around AI-driven cancer research has moved decisively past theory. Now the focus is on what’s being deployed and how to gain researchers’ and clinicians’ trust.

Fay Lin, PhD, senior editor, technology at GEN, and Jonathan D. Grinstein, PhD, North American editor at Inside Precision Medicine, discuss how AI is increasingly embedded across cancer research areas, from organoid models to pathology. Yet challenges such as data integration, longitudinal patient tracking, and clinician confidence continue to hinder its impact on patient outcomes.

Watch the full discussion below for a clearer view of the trends, tensions, and inflection points in AI shaping the future of cancer research:

 

The post AACR 2026 Video Update: Cancer Research Edges Toward an AI-Driven Era appeared first on GEN – Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology News.

<![CDATA[How do estrogen, testosterone, and aromatase shape binge eating and bulimia risk? Let’s explore brain biomarkers and future hormone-aware treatments.]]>

Prediabetes Genotyping Identifies Who Benefits from Vitamin D

Genotyping could help identify people who would most benefit from vitamin D supplements to prevent their progression to diabetes, further analysis of a clinical trial suggests.

The genetic association study indicated that individuals with glycemic indicators of prediabetes could benefit from supplementation with 4000 IU/d of vitamin D3 if they carried specific genetic polymorphisms.

Two genotypes of the ApaI vitamin D receptor polymorphism (VDR) were linked to a risk reduction when these vitamin supplements were taken compared with placebo, according to the report in JAMA Open.

“Our exploratory findings, if confirmed, hold promise for high-dose vitamin D3 as a targeted, personalized approach to reducing the risk of type 2 diabetes among selected adults with prediabetes,” reported Bess Dawson-Hughes, MD, from the Jean Mayer USDA Human Nutrition Research Center on Aging at Tufts University in Boston, and co-workers.

“The magnitude of the observed risk reduction among participants with AC and CC alleles of the ApaI polymorphism, if confirmed in an independent clinical trial, would have clinical implications for the management of prediabetes.”

There are four major polymorphisms in the vitamin D receptor: FokI, BsmI, ApaI, and TaqI. While the FokI polymorphism produces a shorter vitamin D receptor with enhanced transcriptional activity, the BsmI, ApaI, and TaqI polymorphisms influence mRNA stability, posttranscriptional regulation, and translational efficiency.

ApaI is strongly associated with metabolic syndrome and obesity, which are both major risk factors for type 2 diabetes.

In an extended analysis of the Vitamin D and Type 2 Diabetes (D2d) trial, researchers examined whether VDR gene variants modified the results of the trial.

The primary outcome of the original trial, conducted in people who achieved at least two of the three glycemic criteria for prediabetes, did not reach statistical significance in the intention-to-treat analysis. However, further examination revealed that the effect of vitamin D3 depended on the achieved intratrial serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25[OH]D) levels.

Dawson-Hughes and team therefore examined common VDR polymorphisms in the D2d trial to see whether these polymorphisms were associated with reduced diabetes risk among participants who achieved higher intratrial mean 25(OH)D level, in a discovery-level analysis.

They then conducted a test phase to determine whether participants’ VDR genetic profile modified the response to vitamin D3 supplementation compared with placebo.

Among 2098 participants in the D2d trial, the 618 carrying the AA alleles experienced no reduction in risk of progression to type 2 diabetes either when achieving higher intratrial 25(OH)D concentrations or when using vitamin D3 4000 IUs per day for a median of 2.5 years after adjusting for race, sex, and body mass index, among other variables.

However, the 1480 participants with ApaI AC and CC genotypes—representing 71% of the study population—had a progressively lower risk of type 2 diabetes at intratrial 25(OH)D levels of 40 ng/ml or higher.

Participants with these genotypes had a 19% reduction in the risk of progressing to type 2 diabetes over the same period (Hazard ratio=0.81).

“If confirmed, a 19% risk reduction in conversion to type 2 diabetes with vitamin D3 supplementation would not be trivial,” the authors concluded, noting that assessment of a single VDR polymorphism is inexpensive and now widely available.

In a Commentary article accompanying the study, Michael Holick, PhD, and Arash Shirvani, PhD, both from Boston University, added: “The enormity of the disease burden of diabetes worldwide and the confirmation that vitamin D supplementation of 4000 IUs per day markedly reduces risk of developing it should be a wake-up call and the impetus for health organizations to develop strategies to improve vitamin D status for children and adults with food fortification programs, implementation of supplementation, and sensible sun exposure recommendations for those who are at risk.”

The post Prediabetes Genotyping Identifies Who Benefits from Vitamin D appeared first on Inside Precision Medicine.

New ADC Yields Encouraging Clinical Benefit in Platinum-Resistant Ovarian Cancer

Patients with advanced platinum-resistant ovarian cancer whose disease had progressed on standard therapy experienced clinical benefit when treated with the investigational antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) QLS5132.

This finding is according to results from a Phase I clinical trial presented at the American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) Annual Meeting 2026, held in San Diego.

Patients diagnosed with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer face both a poor prognosis and limited treatment options, explained Tao Zhu, MD, chief physician and vice president of Zhejiang Cancer Hospital in China, who presented the study.

Zhu and collaborators tested an investigational ADC, QLS5132, which targets the protein CLDN6. QLS5132 combines a CLDN6-targeting monoclonal antibody with a cytotoxic payload, topoisomerase-1 inhibitor, at a drug-to-antibody ratio of 8:1. CLDN6, Zhu said, makes an ideal target as a protein with very high expression on the surface of ovarian cancer cells and minimal cell-surface expression in healthy tissues.

“The primary purpose of this first-in-human study was to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetic profile of QLS5132 in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer and determine the recommended Phase II dose for future clinical development,” Zhu said. “Additionally, we aimed to assess preliminary antitumor activity to establish an early signal of clinical benefit in this heavily pretreated population with limited options.”

The Phase I, single-arm, dose-escalation trial enrolled 28 patients with a median age of 57.5 who had been diagnosed with advanced platinum-resistant ovarian cancer and who had experienced progression while on standard therapy. The research team administered QLS5132 as an intravenous infusion every three weeks at dose levels of 1.6 mg/kg, 3.2 mg/kg, 4.8 mg/kg, 5.6 mg/kg, and 6.4 mg/kg.

Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 26 (92.9%) patients, with nausea, anorexia, anemia, and weakness occurring most frequently. Nine (32.1%) patients experienced TRAEs of grade 3 or higher, and of those grade ≥3 TRAEs, seven were instances of hematological toxicity. No TRAEs led to treatment discontinuation or death, and no patients experienced interstitial lung disease, ocular toxicity, or febrile neutropenia, Zhu said.

After a median follow-up of 2.2 months, nine patients had a partial response at various dose levels. Two of these partial responses occurred in patients who had no detectable CLDN6 expression.

Across all dose levels, 18 evaluable patients experienced an objective response rate of 50% and a disease control rate of 94.4%. When calculated for the 17 evaluable patients who had received dose levels ≥3.2 mg/kg, the objective response rate and disease control rate rose to 52.9% and 100%, respectively. These responses to QLS5132 occurred irrespective of patients’ CLDN6 expression levels at baseline.

“The most encouraging finding from our study was that QLS5132 demonstrated compelling antitumor activity in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer, with an objective response rate exceeding 50%,” said Zhu. “Equally important, at the potential recommended Phase II dose, we observed a favorable safety profile with no reported cases of interstitial lung disease, ocular toxicity, oral mucositis, or febrile neutropenia.”

Zhu also noted that, though more research would be needed to confirm, preliminary data indicated antitumor activity from QLS5132 regardless of CLDN6 expression levels—which, he said, could expand its potential as a treatment option to a broad cohort of patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer.

Zhu acknowledged that further research would be needed to fully understand why QLS5132 can have anticancer effects in patients with undetectable CLDN6 tumoral expression. But he suggested the phenomenon may have a few explanations, including tumor heterogeneity, as well as a potent bystander effect resulting in antitumor efficacy even in cells with low or no CLDN6 expression.

“These findings support the advancement of QLS5132 into Phase III studies, with the goal of providing a much-needed new treatment option for these patients,” said Zhu.

Some limitations of this study include a small sample size and an exploratory single-arm design.

This study was funded by Qilu Pharmaceutical. Zhu discloses no conflicts of interest.

The post New ADC Yields Encouraging Clinical Benefit in Platinum-Resistant Ovarian Cancer appeared first on GEN – Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology News.

Novel KIR‑CAR T Approach Shows Early Activity Against Solid Tumors

CAR T cell therapies have revolutionized outcomes for certain blood cancers, yet their impact on solid tumors has lagged. The field has long wrestled with T cell exhaustion—a state in which engineered cells lose their potency and fail to sustain an anti‑tumor response.

At this year’s AACR annual meeting in San Diego, researchers from the Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania presented first‑in‑human Phase I data pointing to a possible solution. Their novel “KIR‑CAR” T cell therapy demonstrated a favorable safety profile and early signals of activity across multiple solid tumor types.

The investigational therapy, SynKIR-110, represents a departure from traditional CAR T designs. Rather than using a single-chain receptor, the therapy is modeled after natural killer (NK) cell receptors and uses a “multi-chain” architecture.

This design separates tumor recognition from activation, effectively creating an intrinsic “on-off” mechanism. The T cell remains in a resting state until it encounters its target, at which point the receptor components assemble to trigger an immune attack.

“The KIR-CAR design provides a natural ‘on-off’ mechanism, which helps avoid the problem of T cell exhaustion,” said Janos L. Tanyi, MD, PhD, principal investigator of the study. “The CAR turns on when it finds its target, kills it, and then rests, rather than constantly burning energy.”

This contrasts with conventional CAR T cells, which remain continuously active and can become depleted over time, limiting their effectiveness—particularly in the more complex microenvironment of solid tumors.

The Phase I dose-escalation trial enrolled nine patients with advanced, mesothelin-expressing cancers, including ovarian cancer, mesothelioma, and cholangiocarcinoma. These patients had limited treatment options, having received an average of four prior lines of therapy.

Although the primary goal of the study was to assess safety, early signs of efficacy were observed. Disease stabilization was reported in four patients, and one patient in the highest dose cohort achieved an ongoing partial response.

“These are cancer types that have never had an approved cell therapy,” Tanyi said. “We’re seeing good efficacy signals, even at low doses, and limited toxicity.”

The results suggest that the therapy may be able to generate meaningful anti-tumor responses even in heavily pretreated populations.

Safety has been another major barrier for CAR T therapies, particularly in solid tumors. However, the KIR-CAR approach appears to mitigate some of these concerns.

No dose-limiting toxicities were observed in the initial cohorts. Cytokine release syndrome (CRS), a common side effect of CAR T therapy, occurred in 33% of patients but was limited to low-grade events. Notably, there were no cases of immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), a more severe complication sometimes seen with CAR T therapies.

The ability to limit toxicity while maintaining activity is a key step toward broader application of cell therapies in solid tumors.

SynKIR-110 targets mesothelin, a protein expressed on the surface of several solid tumors but largely absent from normal tissues. This makes it an attractive target for immunotherapy, particularly in cancers such as ovarian cancer and mesothelioma, where treatment options are limited.

The trial results indicate that the therapy’s activity is not confined to a single tumor type, raising the possibility of broader applicability across mesothelin-expressing cancers.

The findings come amid growing efforts to adapt CAR T technology for solid tumors. While the approach has revolutionized hematologic malignancies, solid tumors present additional challenges, including immunosuppressive microenvironments, physical barriers to T cell infiltration, and antigen heterogeneity.

Researchers are exploring multiple strategies to address these barriers, including improved targeting, combination therapies, and next-generation receptor designs such as KIR-CAR.

As noted by CAR T pioneer Carl June, MD, advancing cellular therapies into solid tumors remains a central goal for the field.

The Phase I study continues to enroll patients, aiming for a 42‑person cohort to define the maximum tolerated dose ahead of Phase II. Early readouts show that CAR T expansion rises with dose, a pattern that may translate into stronger anti‑tumor activity at higher levels.

While still preliminary, the findings highlight the potential of multi‑chain CAR designs to sustain activity without added toxicity. If confirmed, KIR‑CAR therapies could usher in a new generation of engineered immune cells that more closely mirror natural immune regulation.

For now, the data offer a promising sign that CAR T innovation may finally be gaining ground in solid tumors.

The post Novel KIR‑CAR T Approach Shows Early Activity Against Solid Tumors appeared first on GEN – Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology News.

<![CDATA[Psychiatry experts explain why off-label psych meds and polypharmacy can be essential.]]>

Earliest Events of Lung Cancer Development Mapped

Researchers at Memorial Sloan Kettering (MSK) Cancer Center have identified the earliest cellular and molecular events that create the needed conditions for lung cancer cells to begin their growth into a tumor. The study, published in Nature, describes how cells with cancer-causing mutations initiate a coordinated chain of events to involve nearby fibroblasts and immune cells to create a microenvironment conducive to tumor growth at the very start of disease.

“We also found that this transformation of the local neighborhood is reversible, if caught early enough. This opens the door to new treatment and prevention strategies,” said senior author Joo-Hyeon Lee, PhD, an associate member in the developmental biology program at MSK.

The research focused on lung alveolar type II (AT2) stem cells that acquire mutations in the KRAS gene. Rather than simply proliferating, the mutant cells enter a regenerative-like state that resembles tissue repair. In this state, they produce amphiregulin (AREG), a signaling molecule that initiates communication with surrounding cells. AREG activates nearby fibroblasts through EGFR signaling, which prompts them to adopt a fibrotic, injury-like state which results in a remodeling of the extracellular matrix.

Within the microenvironment created, fibroblasts play a central role in shielding emerging tumor cells by producing a fibrous scaffold that supports tumor growth while also releasing signals that alter the activity of immune cells. Macrophages recruited to the site undergo reprogramming, shifting away from fighting the tumor toward phenotypes that suppress immune responses. Neutrophils and regulatory T cells are also recruited, further dampening anti-tumor immunity. This coordinated activity creates a protective niche in which the cells with the KRAS mutation can grow without being eliminated.

“These reciprocal interactions establish a self-sustaining epithelial–stromal–immune circuit that generates a tumor-permissive niche before malignant outgrowth,” the researches wrote. This loop reinforces itself: mutant cells sustain fibroblast activation, fibroblasts reshape immune responses, and immune cells further support tumor-promoting conditions.

The study builds on prior research in the Lee lab into lung injury and repair, which showed that normal regenerative programs involve temporary activation of stem cells and fibroblasts. In cancer, however, this process becomes dysregulated. Mutant cells remain locked in a regenerative state, continuously signaling to their environment. Earlier work by the same group had identified these regenerative states as a feature of early tumorigenesis.

To identify the mechanisms involved, the MSK first used mouse models of lung cancer carrying KRAS mutations. Through lineage tracing and single-cell analyses, they tracked individual cells to map how interactions with fibroblasts and immune cells evolved over time. They then used tissue samples from patients with early-stage lung adenocarcinoma and found returned the same result of cancer cells producing high levels of AREG and adjacent fibrotic fibroblasts.

Importantly, the team demonstrated that disrupting this communication network can prevent tumor formation. Blocking AREG signaling with an EGFR inhibitor kept fibroblasts and immune cells in their normal states and significantly impaired tumor development. Similarly, removing the AREG gene from mutant cells prevented the formation of the tumor-supportive niche. Even after early lesions had formed, inhibiting KRAS activity reversed many of the changes that had already occurred in the microenvironment.

The implications of this research to influence for cancer care are substantial. The identification of early signaling events and microenvironmental changes suggests new biomarkers for detecting lung cancer before it becomes advanced. High levels of AREG or evidence of fibroblast activation could indicate the presence of precancerous lesions, which could be particularly important for screening those at high risk of developing cancer, such as long-term smokers.

The findings also suggest there could be the development of new therapeutics aimed at preventing cancer development as opposed to treating it once it is established. By targeting the AREG–EGFR signaling axis or disrupting fibroblast activation, clinicians may be able to block tumor development at its earliest stages. Because the team showed these processes can be reversed, there is a window for intervention before the disease becomes resistant to treatment.

“The reversibility of these preneoplastic circuits defines a therapeutic window before progression to treatment-resistant disease,” the researchers wrote.

Next steps for the team include validating biomarkers in clinical populations, refining organoid models to study patient-specific tumor development, and testing preventive therapies that target these newly identified early signaling pathways.

The post Earliest Events of Lung Cancer Development Mapped appeared first on Inside Precision Medicine.