BackgroundLate-life depression is common in older adults and is often under-recognized. Short-video platforms have become a major source of mental health information. However, content quality and transparency remain uncertain.MethodsWe conducted a cross-sectional assessment of highly viewed videos on late-life depression on three Chinese platforms. We searched each platform using the keyword in Chinese “Late-life depression”. We selected the top 200 videos by view count on Douyin, Rednotes (Xiaohongshu), and BiliBili. After exclusions, 562 videos were included (Douyin, n=188; Rednotes, n=188; BiliBili, n=186). Two medically trained raters scored videos using the Global Quality Score (GQS), modified DISCERN (mDISCERN), and JAMA benchmark criteria. We also coded content categories and creator types. We assessed platform differences using non-parametric tests. We examined associations between a limited engagement proxy, defined as the comment-to-view ratio, and quality scores using Spearman correlation.ResultsVideo duration differed across platforms (p<0.001). Engagement indicators were higher on Douyin and Rednotes than on BiliBili. Symptoms were the most common topic on all platforms. Prevention and intervention ranked second on Douyin and Rednotes. On BiliBili, causes and case-based analysis were also common. Overall quality was moderate. Mean GQS ranged from 2.96 to 3.05. Transparency was limited. Mean JAMA ranged from 1.91 to 2.04. Reliability was slightly higher on BiliBili based on mDISCERN. Creator type was strongly associated with scores. Expert and institutional videos scored higher than general and marketing-oriented accounts. Correlations between visible audience interaction and quality were weak.ConclusionHighly viewed late-life depression videos on major Chinese platforms show moderate quality and limited transparency. Exposure does not reliably signal higher-quality information. Platforms and health authorities should strengthen source disclosure and promote evidence-based content from qualified creators.
Radically different