Trait, state, and behavior in adolescent NSSI addiction: a serial mediation model linking childhood trauma to NSSI addiction

BackgroundDespite growing recognition of non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) as a potential behavioral addiction, the sequential mechanisms linking childhood trauma to NSSI addiction remain unclear. This study examined a serial mediation model testing whether trait impulsivity and depressive symptoms sequentially mediate this relationship, with NSSI function as a behavioral coping mechanism.MethodsThis cross-sectional study included 163 Chinese adolescents diagnosed with major depressive disorder and a history of NSSI. Participants completed the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire-Short Form, the Short UPPS-P Impulsive Behavior Scale, the Children’s Depression Inventory, and the Ottawa Self-Injury Inventory (Functions and Addictive Features subscales). Serial mediation analysis (PROCESS Model 6, 5,000 bootstrap resamples), controlling for demographic and clinical covariates, tested the hypothesized five-step sequential model.ResultsChildhood trauma was positively associated with NSSI addiction, and this association was predominantly mediated: the total indirect effect accounted for 56.2% of the total effect. Indirect effects involving NSSI function in combination with upstream mediators were significant, including the full sequential path (B = 0.0033, 95% CI [0.0007, 0.0083]), whereas simple mediations via impulsivity, depression, or NSSI function alone were not.ConclusionThese findings support a trait-state-behavior-addiction cascade in which childhood trauma is associated with trait impulsivity and depressive symptoms that, in combination with the reinforcing function of NSSI, are linked to addictive features of NSSI. The model advances theoretical understanding of NSSI addiction and offers actionable clinical targets for prevention and intervention. Longitudinal studies are needed to confirm causal directions.

Adolescent non-suicidal self-injury scale – short form: revision and evaluation of its reliability and validity

ObjectiveNon-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) is a clinically significant concern among adolescents, and its accurate yet efficient assessment is essential for research, early identification, and intervention. Existing Chinese instruments—most notably the 19-item Adolescent Self-Harm Questionnaire (ASHS)—are relatively lengthy and ill-suited to rapid, large-scale screening. The present study had two aims: (a) to develop a short form of the ASHS, the Adolescent Non-Suicidal Self-Injury Scale–Short Form (ANSSI-SF), by integrating classical test theory (CTT) item analysis with genetic algorithm (GA) cross-validation, and (b) to evaluate its reliability, validity, and screening utility relative to the parent scale.MethodsUsing a convenience sample of 1,090 primary and secondary school students, seven items—one for each of seven behavioral categories derived from a functional–typological framework of self-harm—were selected on the basis of CTT item statistics and GA cross-validation. The scale was evaluated through item analysis, internal-consistency and split-half reliability, exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis (EFA/CFA), correlations with theoretically related constructs, known-groups comparisons (gender; smartphone addiction), and consistency and screening-accuracy analyses against the full 19-item ASHS.ResultsIt indicated that all items demonstrated strong correlations with the total score, and both internal consistency and split-half reliability reached satisfactory levels.A unidimensional factor structure also exhibited good model fit. Additionally, scale scores were significantly positively correlated with related psychological indicators such as depression, anxiety, and sleep problems, and effectively differentiated differences in self-injurious behavior across gender and smartphone addiction groups.GA cross-validation confirmed that the selected items balanced parsimony with full coverage of all seven behavioral categories.DiscussionThese findings indicate that the ANSSI-SF is a brief, reliable, and valid instrument that preserves the content breadth of the parent ASHS while substantially reducing administration burden. It is well suited to rapid, large-scale screening and early identification of at-risk adolescents, facilitating timely referral and prevention. Limitations include convenience sampling from a single region and the absence of test–retest reliability; future research should validate the scale in clinical and diverse cultural samples and examine its predictive validity.

Trauma-informed psychological support alongside long-acting injectable buprenorphine: clients’ perspectives on the Buvidal psychological support service (BPSS) pilot in Wales

BackgroundOpioid use disorder (OUD) is associated with persistent drug use, high relapse rates, and significant morbidity, mortality, and psychosocial harm. While Long-Acting Injectable Buprenorphine (LAIB), marketed as Buvidal, offers improved pharmacological management over traditional opioid substitution therapy (OST), the mental clarity provided by LAIB often surfaces unresolved trauma and mental health needs. Integrating trauma-informed psychological care alongside pharmacological intervention is increasingly recognized as critical to optimize recovery outcomes for individuals with co-occurring psychiatric co-morbidities and substance use disorder.ObjectiveThis evaluation aimed to explore client experience of the Buvidal Psychological Support Service, a tiered trauma-informed psychological service, piloted to support individuals with OUD receiving LAIB in Wales, UK.MethodsQualitative data were derived from nine semi-structured interviews with BPSS service users, exploring their experiences, perceived impacts, and recovery journeys through reflexive thematic analysis.ResultsFindings indicated the transition to LAIB was often transformative but exposed trauma and emotional difficulties previously masked by substance use, making the availability of timely psychological support critical for maintaining abstinence and wellbeing. Clients valued the BPSS’s rapid access, continuity, person-centered care and non-judgmental ethos, reporting enhanced agency, emotional regulation, and social reintegration. Relapse prevention was strongly linked to psychological support alongside pharmacological treatment.ConclusionThe findings suggest that participants experienced BPSS as a valuable adjunct to LAIB, particularly where increased mental clarity brought trauma-related and emotional difficulties into focus. The pilot highlights the potential value of integrating trauma-informed psychological support within LAIB pathways, while further evaluation is needed to assess transferability and longer-term outcomes.

Effect of transcranial alternating current stimulation (NET Device™) on psychostimulant withdrawal severity and time course: a real-world data analysis

BackgroundPsychostimulant use disorder is a life-threatening condition with no FDA-approved treatment. Stimulant withdrawal symptoms impede treatment engagement and are unaddressed by standard of care. The NET Device, a non-invasive transcranial alternating current stimulator, is FDA-cleared for opioid withdrawal suppression. No studies have evaluated whether NET Device use attenuates psychostimulant withdrawal.MethodsElectronic health record and device utilization data were collected from 109 stimulant-only users and 112 stimulant/opioid co-users (N = 221 adults total; Mage=39.2, SDage=10.7; 119M) entering residential addiction treatment (n = 168) or detention centers (n = 53). The Amphetamine Cessation Symptom Assessment (ACSA) was administered at baseline and 1 hour (day 1), and twice daily on days 1–7. A linear mixed model (LMM) with random intercepts and slopes was used to analyze the trajectory of ACSA scores.ResultsACSA severity and time course were similar across settings (residential vs. detention). A two-phase LMM separated acute (baseline to 1 hour) and post-acute withdrawal symptom reductions. Relative to baseline ACSA scores, stimulant-only and co-user groups each reported significant reductions at 1 hour (46% and 33%), day 2 morning (59% and 42%), and decelerating log-time trajectory through day 4 (79 hours), the primary analysis window. Estimates beyond day 4 rest on 6.9% of observations and are reported as exploratory only.ConclusionNET Device monotherapy was associated with rapid reduction in psychostimulant withdrawal severity regardless of setting and opioid co-use. No device-related adverse events were reported. These real-world data support initiation of a sham-controlled randomized trial to evaluate NET Device efficacy for stimulant use disorder.

Relationship between loneliness and self-efficacy: the mediating role of internet addiction and the moderating role of sleep quality

IntroductionThis study aimed to examine the association between loneliness and self-efficacy among adolescents and to investigate whether internet addiction mediated this association and whether sleep quality moderated the direct and indirect pathways. Although previous research has demonstrated significant associations between loneliness and both general and social self-efficacy, the behavioral mechanisms underlying these associations and the conditions under which their strength may vary remain insufficiently understood.MethodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted among 1,323 students in Grades 7–9 from two schools in Baotou, Inner Mongolia, China. Participants completed the UCLA Loneliness Scale, the General Self-Efficacy Scale, the Internet Addiction Diagnostic Questionnaire, and the Athens Insomnia Scale. A moderated mediation model was used to examine the mediating role of internet addiction and the moderating role of sleep quality in the association between loneliness and self-efficacy.ResultsLoneliness was negatively associated with self-efficacy. Internet addiction partially mediated the association between loneliness and self-efficacy. In addition, sleep quality moderated the direct association between loneliness and self-efficacy and the first stage of the indirect pathway from loneliness to internet addiction. Specifically, the associations of loneliness with self-efficacy and internet addiction varied across different levels of sleep quality.DiscussionThese findings provide a more comprehensive understanding of the mechanisms linking loneliness to adolescent self-efficacy by identifying internet addiction as an important behavioral mediator and sleep quality as a moderating factor. The findings highlight the importance of considering problematic Internet use and sleep quality when developing interventions aimed at promoting adolescents’ psychological adjustment, self-efficacy, and well-being.

Predicting multiple mental health outcomes in adolescents using explainable machine learning models

IntroductionAdolescent mental health problems, including depression, anxiety, and stress, are an increasing public health concern, yet the factors associated with different mental health outcomes may vary across domains. This study investigated shared and outcome-specific predictive features of depression, anxiety, perceived stress, and psychological well-being using explainable machine learning models.MethodsA cross-sectional study was conducted among 1,088 adolescents aged 13–18 years recruited from secondary schools in Wuhan, China, using multistage cluster sampling. Participants completed validated measures of emotional dysregulation, loneliness, social media addiction, self-esteem, sleep quality, academic stress, family support, physical activity, and mental health outcomes. Four algorithms—linear regression, support vector regression, Random Forest, and XGBoost—were trained using an 80/20 train-test split with five-fold cross-validation, and model performance was evaluated using test-set R², RMSE, and MAE. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) were used to examine feature contributions. To minimize target leakage, outcome-specific feature sets were used, with PSQI and RSES excluded from the depression model because of direct or substantial conceptual overlap with PHQ-9 content, and PSQI excluded from the well-being model because of overlap with WHO-5 content.ResultsXGBoost showed the strongest out-of-sample predictive performance across all four outcomes, explaining 49% of the variance in depression (R² = 0.49, 95% CI: 0.44–0.53; RMSE = 3.52; MAE = 2.81), 55% in anxiety (R² = 0.55, 95% CI: 0.50–0.59; RMSE = 3.04; MAE = 2.47), 60% in perceived stress (R² = 0.60, 95% CI: 0.56–0.64; RMSE = 3.71; MAE = 2.87), and 50% in psychological well-being (R² = 0.50, 95% CI: 0.45–0.54; RMSE = 3.38; MAE = 2.68).DiscussionEmotional dysregulation and loneliness were consistently among the most influential features, while academic stress, family support, social media addiction, self-esteem, and sleep quality showed outcome-specific contributions. SHAP rankings for the depression model were stable across five-fold cross-validation, with emotional dysregulation and loneliness consistently occupying the highest ranks.

Problematic Reliance on Generative AI in an Anxious Young Adult: Case Report

Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools are increasingly integrated into daily life, offering cognitive support across domains such as writing, decision-making, and social interpretation. While beneficial, excessive reliance may contribute to diminished confidence in one’s own thinking. This report describes a woman in her mid-20s with Generalized Anxiety Disorder and Major Depressive Disorder who developed a pattern of functional dependence on generative AI tools- specifically ChatGPT. She historically had strong social, academic and occupational functioning. Psychiatric consultation did not suggest the presence of a personality disorder, and although she was a high-achieving individual, clinically significant perfectionistic traits were not evident. Despite this, she increasingly relied on AI for routine cognitive and interpersonal tasks including composing emails, interpreting social interactions, predicting the future and making decisions and felt increasingly uncomfortable completing such tasks independently. This case highlights the potential danger of generative AI tools in reassurance seeking behavior and how it might compound anxiety. These behaviors were observed across both professional and personal contexts, suggesting that AI use was not limited to task-specific assistance but reflected a generalized strategy for managing uncertainty and self-doubt. This behavioral pattern is characterized in this case by cognitive offloading, reduced confidence in independent judgment, and reinforcement of externalized thinking processes. This led to the subjective belief of declining skill and compromised functional autonomy. The Interaction of Person-Affect-Cognition-Execution (I-PACE) model was used to describe this pattern of behavior. While repeatedly turning to a family member or friend for validation and reassurance might lead to interpersonal fatigue, AI tools have no such limits and are infinitely accessible. This might ultimately worsen a patient’s ability to tolerate uncertainty. Given the ubiquity of AI tools and the prevalence of anxiety disorders, clinicians may need to be aware of the role AI tools potentially play in reassurance seeking and thus perpetuation of anxiety.
<img src="https://jmir-production.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/thumbs/b5b1c680b8f330c90144ec99278fd88a" />