Lithuanian children’s trauma characteristics and correlates: comparison of clinical and non-clinical samples

IntroductionPrevious studies have shown that children’s exposure to potentially traumatic events and their trauma−related symptoms may not always be consistently identified. This study aims to examine differences in trauma exposure and related psychological outcomes between clinical and non−clinical Lithuanian children.MethodsThis cross-sectional study included 10–17−year−old children and adolescents recruited from a clinical inpatient setting (Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Klinikos) and general−education schools in Vilnius and nearby districts. After parental consent and child assent, participants completed a secure mobile assessment covering exposure to potentially traumatic events (CATS), dissociation (A−DES), mood and feeling (SMFQ), post−traumatic cognitions (CPTCI), PTSD symptoms (CATS; PCL−5 for convergent validation), and perceived social support (CASSS). Data were collected in 2023–2024. Group differences were examined using Welch’s t−tests (with Mann–Whitney U as robustness checks), and associations were assessed using Pearson correlations.ResultsIn the clinical sample over 40% of children experienced physical violence, while in the non−clinical sample 82.9% children reported exposure to multiple traumatic events. The clinical sample showed significantly higher dissociation, negative mood, and PTSD symptoms compared to the non−clinical sample. However, among children exposed to more than one traumatic event, differences in dissociation, PTSD symptoms, and close−friend support were not significant. Across both samples, exposure to potentially traumatic events was strongly associated with PTSD symptoms, dissociation, and post−traumatic cognitions, and moderately associated with mood symptoms. In the non−clinical sample, parental support showed moderate negative associations with dissociation, mood symptoms, post−traumatic cognitions, and PTSD symptoms.DiscussionThis study identified between−sample differences in exposure to potentially traumatic events and trauma−related psychological outcomes among Lithuanian children in inpatient and community settings, highlighting the need for trauma−informed assessment and attention to social support within child mental health and welfare services.

Sex-specific impact of vitamin D and B9 concentrations on neuroticism: a polygenic score-based study

IntroductionNeuroticism is a personality domain with prognostic value for physical and mental health. To properly inform public health policy, it is crucial to uncover the mechanisms underlying high neuroticism. Many internal and external factors that affect brain development and functioning and therefore might contribute to the variability of neuroticism remain understudied. Among them, the impact of vitamin sufficiency is of great interest, as it is a modifiable factor. This study aimed to evaluate the associations of neuroticism with vitamin D (VD) and vitamin B9 (VB9) using polygenic scores (PGS) in a nonclinical cohort.MethodsWe analyzed data from 348 healthy unrelated individuals, including neuroticism scores on the Eysenck Personality Inventory, VD-PGS, VB9-PGS and PGS for neuroticism-related traits.ResultsThe analysis controlling for demographic and genetic confounders revealed a negative association between VB9-PGS and neuroticism scores in women and a positive association between VD-PGS and neuroticism scores in men. The highest values of the VD-PGS were observed in men, who scored high on both neuroticism and extraversion. In men, unlike women, neuroticism scores were not correlated with PGS for neuroticism but were associated with PGS for bipolar disorder type 1 and alcohol use disorders.ConclusionThe results suggest that the effects on neuroticism of genetic propensity for suboptimal vitamin D and B9 concentrations might differ across the two sexes. The findings are consistent with the idea of the importance of vitamin B9 for emotional stability in women and indicate the involvement of genetic factors predisposing to higher vitamin D levels in excitability-related components of neuroticism in men.

Impact of extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields exposure on sleep quality and mental health in a Tunisian power plant: a cross-sectional study

IntroductionExtremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields (ELF-EMFs) are ubiquitous in our daily life. They may have an impact not only on physical health but also on mental health.ObjectivesTo assess the impact of occupational exposure to the ELF-EMFs on sleep quality, depression, anxiety and stress among workers at the Tunisian Electricity and Gas Company (TEGC).MethodsThis was a cross-sectional study. The study population included two groups: an exposed group (EG), consisting of power plant employees, and a non-exposed group (NEG), consisting of administrative workers. Exposure to ELF-EMFs was assessed via spot measurements using a magnetometer. Sleep quality, depression, anxiety and stress were assessed by the French versions of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) and the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS-21).ResultsSeventy-seven participants in the EG and 88 participants in the NEG were included in the study. The median value of the ELF-EMFs was 5.86 μT at the power plant [min 0.1, max 40.34 μT]. According to the PSQI global score, 64.9% of the EG had poor sleep quality versus 29.5% of the NEG. Depression was registered in 24.7% of EG and in 3.4% of NEG. Anxiety was noted in 23.4% of the EG and in none of the NEG. Stress was found in 46.8% of the EG and none of the NEG. After multivariate analysis, ELF-EMF exposure was significantly associated with poor sleep quality and depression.ConclusionThe present study revealed that ELF-EMFs can affect sleep and mental health. Further studies are needed to explain the mechanism involved.

Mental health in the time of polycrisis: geopolitical determinants and modern psychiatry

Psychiatry is increasingly being practised in environments affected by geopolitical instabilities, including economic fragmentation, democratic backsliding, and widening inequities. The confluence of these phenomena contributes to what has been described as a contemporary polycrisis, encompassing synchronous disruptions that reinforce one another and threaten collective wellbeing. Nevertheless, psychiatric research and clinical work have generally remained oriented towards immediate determinants and risk factors, overlooking the macro-level political and institutional dynamics that can condition stressor exposure and mental health disparities. Amidst, interconnected crises, this paper advances geopsychiatry as a framework for understanding how distal geopolitical determinants translate into psychiatric vulnerabilities across communities and societies. Focussing on armed conflicts, climate change, and forced migration as emblematic domains of polycrisis, it highlights how these compounding phenomena are generating direct mental health burdens and may amplify harms via secondary pathways. Moreover, it contends that the psychiatric consequences of polycrisis are unlikely to be ameliorated through patient-centred interventions alone, but also require innovative approaches responsive to structural inequalities and material forces that transcend borders. In this context, work from geopsychiatry can offer important implications for modern psychiatry, highlighting a need for a more globally representative evidence base, potential clinical adaptations, and policy engagement that better attends to the geopolitical determinants of mental health.

Building a Science-Driven Business: How National Institutes of Health Funding Enabled an Evidence-Based Approach to Maternal Mental Health Innovation

The digital mental health (DMH) industry has grown drastically over the last decade; yet, many DMH products have failed to demonstrate meaningful clinical outcomes, in large part due to lack of scientific evidence. This viewpoint paper highlights an example of how early-stage DMH companies can prioritize science as a strategic advantage. We discuss Moment for Parents, an artificial intelligence–driven maternal mental health app built entirely with support from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) program. We illustrate the advantages and challenges of building a science-backed product with federal funding. Benefits include credible evidence generation, independence in product development, and enhanced market differentiation. We also discuss the challenges of navigating the SBIR ecosystem, including grant writing and administrative demands, and aligning business objectives with federal research priorities. By showcasing both the promise and complexity of SBIR funding, this viewpoint paper offers actionable insights for founders and chief executive officers who aim to prioritize science in the DMH space.
<img src="https://jmir-production.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/thumbs/0353d3d1a7028c09b54629066fd3bca7" />

Expected Competencies and Personal Attributes of Digital Health Navigators to Support Digital Mental Health Care: Focus Group and Interview Study With Patients and Health Care Professionals

Background: Digital mental health apps (DMHAs), and in particular digital therapeutics (DTx), offer promising opportunities to support mental health care. However, their effective use in outpatient settings in Germany remains limited. To overcome this gap, the role of digital health navigators (DHNs) has been introduced. DHNs are trained individuals who support patients and health care professionals in selecting, using, and integrating DMHAs into care. Despite increasing interest in this role, there is limited evidence on the competencies, knowledge, and personal attributes required for DHNs to work effectively in mental health settings. Objective: The study aims to explore the expected competencies, knowledge areas, and personal attributes that DHNs need to effectively support the implementation and use of DTx in outpatient mental health care. Methods: As part of the prestudy of the Digital Navigators for Acceptance and Competence Development with Mental Health Apps (DigiNavi) study, a qualitative study was conducted involving 35 participants (7 general practitioners, 8 patients in general practice, 11 outpatient psychiatrists/psychologists, and 9 patients in psychiatric outpatient clinics) from different general practices and psychiatric outpatient clinics in Germany. A total of 17 semistructured interviews and 4 focus groups were conducted to explore expectations of DHNs. Data were analyzed using qualitative content analysis. Results: Participants emphasized that DHNs should combine strong interpersonal skills (empathy, patience, and sensitive communication) with technical and basic clinical competencies. Most favored DHNs as integrated clinical team members (eg, medical assistants), citing their existing patient relationships, but noted time and training constraints. Key expectations included the ability to support patients with DTx use, adapt communication to individual needs, and convey data privacy information clearly. Foundational knowledge of mental health conditions and sensitivity to crises were considered important for identifying warning signs and escalating concerns. While DHNs were seen as essential intermediaries between patients, health care professionals, and DTx, participants highlighted the necessity for clearly defined roles, structured training, and realistic expectations to prevent role overload and enable sustainable implementation in outpatient mental health care. Conclusions: DHNs require a specialized skill set that bridges clinical understanding, digital expertise, and interpersonal competence. Our results lay the groundwork for developing training curricula and implementation strategies that align with real-world expectations for the DHN role. Defining these core competencies is essential for supporting the sustainable and effective integration of DMHAs into mental health care. Trial Registration: German Clinical Trials Register DRKS00034327; https://drks.de/search/en/trial/DRKS00034327 and ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06575582; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06575582 International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID): RR2-10.2196/67655
<img src="https://jmir-production.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/thumbs/291c3a29cc1b4784b5ad2844475976e0" />

How to De-Escalate an Autistic Meltdown

A common misconception about tantrums and meltdowns is that they’re interchangeable. But while they share some similarities in their initial expression — crying, screaming, door slamming, harsh words — they’re actually quite different. Dealing with a meltdown requires a more specialized approach, especially with kids on the autism spectrum.

What is a tantrum vs a meltdown?

The two events happen for different reasons. A child throws a tantrum when they’re angry or frustrated, acting out because they feel an injustice has been done to them. They are aware of what they’re doing and still have some sense of control. And if a child’s tantrum is ignored by their parent or caregiver, it will likely subside quickly.

Meltdowns, on the other hand, happen involuntarily and seemingly out of nowhere. They also tend to become much more intense than a typical tantrum and may involve violent behavior such as head banging, hitting others, and damaging property. Once a meltdown has started, intervention is needed to stop it, whether it’s self-imposed (e.g., removing oneself from the trigger) or external (e.g., support from the parent or caregiver). The event can last between a few minutes and several hours.

Tantrums are common among all children, but kids with autism are more likely to experience meltdowns of varying degrees, says Conner Black, PhD, associate director of the Autism Center at the Child Mind Institute.

What are the stages of an autistic meltdown?

For a child with autism, a meltdown is triggered when they become overwhelmed, whether it’s by stress, powerful emotions, sensory input, change, or something else. Their sympathetic nervous system — the network in the body responsible for our “fight-or-flight” response — goes into overdrive and they lose control.

There are several stages to an autistic meltdown and understanding them can help you know how to respond effectively. The duration and intensity of the meltdown depend on whether intervention, including learned coping skills, can stop the child from reaching a crisis point, Dr. Black explains. “Certain skills may not work every time, and that’s really no one’s fault,” he says, but once a child reaches that crisis stage, intervention is no longer useful. He describes the course of a meltdown via the phases of the behavior escalation cycle:

  • Calm: “This is basically the valley or plain on the side of mountain, which is considered the baseline, when the child is happy, relaxed, and at their best,” Dr. Black says. For instance, in a classroom setting, a student’s behavior might be described as cooperative and responsive to instruction. These behaviors are specific to the individual, so it helps to recognize what that looks like in your child.
  • Trigger: While triggers can vary, Dr. Black says, there are some common ones that he typically encounters in kids with autism. “They’re often related to the misunderstanding of social situations, a lack of time to engage with their preferred interests, a sudden change in their schedule, or a transition that was unexpected,” he says. “It could also be certain sensory aversion, so things like loud noises or loud conversations. It could even sometimes be as simple as how food is presented on someone’s plate.” The child’s response to that trigger can vary depending on their current internal state or outside environmental factors. But if the trigger isn’t removed or is strong enough to dysregulate the child, they’re going to enter the next phase: agitation.
  • Agitation: At this point, the child will begin to display behaviors that indicate they are no longer in their calm phase. They might start fidgeting, darting their eyes back and forth, or tapping their hands. For other kids, it could look like total disengagement or staring into space. While removing the trigger might still work at the start of this phase, attempts at problem-solving may backfire and push the child to escalate their behaviors.
  • Acceleration/Escalation: “This is really when you start seeing a ramping up of behaviors,” Dr. Black says. “Anything from screaming to throwing toys to aggressing toward the caregiver or whoever’s in the room. Or they could turn that aggression on themselves, whether that’s head banging or hitting themselves repeatedly.” The child may become resistant to intervention and argumentative.
  • Peak/Crisis: At this phase, the child hasn’t responded to attempts to de-escalate and will continue to engage in potentially dangerous behaviors. “When thinking about the crisis point, I think about behaviors that are often going to require a higher level of care. So that could be violence, self-injurious behaviors, or even intense suicidal ideation,” says Dr. Black. To be able to distinguish between escalation and crisis, he adds, it’s important to know what the top level of your child’s behaviors look like. “Throwing things could be the escalation stage, and then the next stage is actually when they’re destroying property,” Dr. Black explains.
  • De-escalation: Finally, the intensity of the behavior begins to subside. The child may appear disoriented, confused, and tired. They will gradually become calmer.
  • Recovery: The child is officially in this phase when they’re fully back at their baseline, Dr. Black says. The behaviors you’ll see at this phase are the same ones you see when they’re in their calm phase.

How to prevent meltdown escalation

Once a child has started to experience a meltdown, it’s hard to get them back to baseline. Depending on the phase, certain interventions may help while others might make things worse.

First, you want to avoid triggers, Dr. Black advises. “Autistic individuals can have a lot of difficulty talking about or even understanding what their emotions are. So, it’s typically up to the parents or caregivers to identify what things can trigger them in a certain way,” he says.

For instance, some kids with autism really thrive with routine and can become agitated when there are unexpected changes. Having a visual schedule of exactly what’s going to happen during the day can help prevent that, says Dr. Black. “If you know there’s going to be a change, you can pick a time, maybe a couple of days in advance, where you talk to them about what that difference is going to be.”

And if your child is known to have meltdowns in public spaces, says Dr. Black, think about what those outside triggers are and how to prepare ahead of time. If they tend to get upset by loud noises, for example, a pair of headphones can be an item — along with phone, wallet, keys! — that you never leave the house without. If possible, work with a mental health professional to identify triggers and develop an escalation plan. 

What to do in the agitation phase

If your child has reached the agitation phase, says Dr. Black, you can try to intervene with coping skills that you’ve learned in therapy, whether it’s something as simple as removing a trigger or giving them a preferred activity in that moment to help prevent their behaviors from escalating.

Sometimes kids encounter an environment, like school, that is beyond your control but contains a wide range of potential triggers and pushes them into the agitation phase. Because their house is a more comfortable environment, kids with autism may keep themselves together at school and then quickly melt down once they get home.

“In that case, for that first hour, let them have their alone time where they can just chill,” Dr. Black suggests. “It could be eating snacks, watching a TV show, or even just sitting quietly in their room. Maybe it’s engaging in some sort of self-stimming behavior.” This can give them the space to cool down and take some time away from any sort of outside stimuli that could push them to move from the agitation phase into the escalation point of a meltdown.

What to do in the acceleration/escalation phase

It can be hard to anticipate every possible trigger, especially when there might be multiple at once on any given day. And sometimes coping strategies aren’t enough to keep a child from escalating or the trigger is too strong. Still, there are some things that Dr. Black suggests you can do to try to keep them from reaching that crisis point.

Keep communication short and concrete

Too much talking can be overwhelming for the child at this stage and might push them to crisis, Dr. Black explains, so the less communication the better. “A simple instruction looks like using just a short sentence. Say there’s a loud noise, for example. You can just say, ‘Go get your headphones,’” he says.

Use visual prompts

Instead of trying to communicate verbally, you can hold up a visual prompt. “If your child has already been working with a therapist or if they’ve learned some coping skills, it would be helpful to have a laminated sheet readily available with their name and pictures of four different coping skill options — like headphones, deep breathing, coloring, sitting alone in their room.”

Dr. Black advises only giving a few options, as it’s already difficult for the child to focus while they’re upset. Additionally, if they don’t choose one right away and you want to try again, he recommends that you “let there be silence for 60 seconds at minimum between prompts, because you don’t want to over-prompt and exacerbate the situation even more.” But providing these choices allows them to maintain their autonomy, which is important during escalation.

What to do in the peak/crisis phase

“Once they get to that apex, they’ve reached the point of no return and just need to go through the process,” says Dr. Black. He stresses that at this point, communication needs to be very minimal or nonexistent.

When maintaining safety is the focus

“The goal switches to really being able to maintain safety for both the individual as well as the family members in the area,” Dr. Black explains. “If they’re harming themselves, such as head banging, move them to their bed so at least it’s on something that’s softer and not going to potentially cause significant injury.”

Efforts to make sure the child is as safe as possible can put you in harm’s way. “If there’s aggression, you can be watching and making sure they’re safe but not getting too close where you could get aggressed upon,” says Dr. Black.

If there are other children in the house, Dr. Black advises that you make plans for how to keep them safe. “Maybe they can go to their room and lock the door while it’s happening,” he says. “Some families have the other kids go to the car and sit and wait until their parents come out to get them.”

When you need emergency services

If the crisis phase goes on for a long period of time, says Dr. Black, “this is when you’d have to think about calling 911. And as kids become adolescents, the response is going to look a lot different. Because of size alone, it’s a little bit easier to manage the situation in a 5-year-old than it would be in a 15-year-old.”

Dr. Black advises that you get in touch with your local police department or EMT service in advance to let them know you have a child with autism in the home, so if you call during an emergency, they are already familiar with your family.

What to do in the de-escalation and recovery phases

Watch for signs that the child is beginning to de-escalate, Dr. Black says. “All you’re doing at this point is maintaining safety until you’re really able to see a lessening of the intensity of the behavior or the frequency decreases a little bit.” Then, he says, you can start to slowly communicate with them again. You really need to be careful here, because it may look like they’re calming down, but if they’re pushed too hard and they’re not ready to talk, they might go right back into crisis phase.

At the recovery phase, “the whole family is recovering,” Dr. Black says. It’s at this point where you can all debrief and work through what may have triggered this escalation and how to possibly prevent it in the future.

“Make sure you’re also debriefing separately with the other siblings in the home after it happens,” Dr. Black adds. “They’ve just witnessed something that may have been traumatic and really stressful for them. There’s often so much focus given to the child with the big behaviors in the moment.”

Medication treatment

Sometimes, a child or teen may suffer from frequent meltdowns to the point that it’s interfering with their quality of life and their ability to attend school. At that time, a mental health professional may recommend working with a psychiatrist to add medication to their treatment.

The type of medication depends on the underlying mechanisms contributing to the behaviors, Dr. Black says. “For instance, if it’s coming from significant anxiety, psychiatrists may prescribe an SSRI like Prozac or Zoloft. If a child has co-occurring ADHD, which is very common, stimulant or non-stimulant ADHD medication might be recommended. And if the behavior stems from irritability or some kind of rigidity, antipsychotic medications like Abilify or risperidone can be useful.”

Improvement is possible

Dr. Black notes that when kids receive the support they need, their quality of life really improves. “I’ve seen that when families work with therapists to come up with different behavioral plans and figure out a proper medication regimen, there’s a lot of improvement in behavior challenges,” he says. “The duration, frequency, and intensity of the meltdowns decrease as the child learns how to handle strong emotions and parents learn how to respond to them. And the medication can help to increase their likelihood of being able to use coping skills or regulation techniques to calm back down when they start to get really frustrated.”

The post How to De-Escalate an Autistic Meltdown appeared first on Child Mind Institute.

STAT+: Trump’s boosting of psychedelics, cannabis signal a new era in GOP drug policy

The days of “Just Say No,” it seems, are long gone. 

Over the weekend, President Trump signed an executive order to increase the availability of certain psychedelics as treatments for mental health conditions, ordering that $50 million be spent, and that the Food and Drug Administration fast-track reviews to usher in their approval. At one point, the president joked to the motley assembly of administration officials, a former Navy SEAL, and the podcaster Joe Rogan:  “Can I have some, please?” 

On Wednesday, the Trump administration announced it had downgraded medical marijuana from the highest tier of controlled substances, and was pushing the Drug Enforcement Administration to do the same for recreational marijuana.

The president’s lenient tack on some mind-altering drugs ushers in a new world of right-wing drug policy. While the administration has emphasized hardline, militaristic tactics when it comes to fentanyl, its recent actions on “softer” drugs could represent a new era not just for Republican politics but also for American drug policy writ large. 

“With this imminent move, we are now confronted with the most pro-drug administration in our history,” Kevin Sabet, the CEO of the anti-legalization advocacy group Smart Approaches to Marijuana, said in a statement. “Policy is now being dictated by marijuana CEOs, psychedelics investors, and podcasters in active addiction — it is a travesty and injustice to the American people of unprecedented proportions. The marijuana industry is the new Big Tobacco, and President Trump is welcoming them to the homes of families across this country with open arms.”

Continue to STAT+ to read the full story…

Cyclothymic and anxious affective temperament in perinatal depression: findings from an exploratory cross-sectional study

IntroductionThe perinatal period represents a vulnerable period in which women may experience high psychic distress due to psychological, biological and social changes. The prevalence of perinatal depression (PND) is estimated around 15%-20% during pregnancy and 16%-18% after childbirth. Although several risk factors have been investigated in the PND development, few studies explored the role of affective temperaments, well known to exert a role in any mood disorders. The aim of our study was to explore which is the most represented affective temperamental profile in PND as well as which is its role in the development and severity of depressive symptoms during perinatal period.MethodsAll pregnant women admitted at the Perinatal Mental Health Outpatient Service, Unit of Clinical Psychiatry, University Hospital of Marche, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy, between April 2021 and July 2025, were screened for PND through Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) and a semi-structured clinical interview (SCID-5-CV). Temperament Evaluation of Memphis, Pisa, Paris and San Diego (TEMPS-M) was administered to all pregnant women. ResultsThe PND prevalence was 33.1%. PND was significantly associated with higher cyclothymic (B = 0.356, p = 0.001) and anxious TEMPS-M scores (B = 0.247, p = 0.026) and a positive psychiatric history (B = 5.245, p < 0.001) (R = 0.6, R2 = 0.36, F(3,129) = 24.189, p < 0.001). Logistic regression indicated that cyclothymic (Exp(B)=1.118, p=0.008), hyperthymic (Exp(B)=0.911, p=0.049), anxious temperaments (Exp(B)=1.109, p=0.029), presence of medical comorbidities (Exp(B)=0.224, p=0.003) and psychiatric history (Exp(B)=5.144, p=0.001) were independent predictors of PND.DiscussionAffective temperaments, particularly cyclothymic and anxious profiles, and prior psychiatric history are predictors of perinatal depression. Incorporating temperament assessment alongside standard screening tools such as the EPDS may improve early identification of women at risk, supporting tailored preventive and therapeutic strategies.