Loneliness, rumination, and adolescent psychological crisis in China: a pilot moderated mediation study
Real-world outcomes of intranasal esketamine and intravenous ketamine induction therapy for treatment-resistant depression in a community clinic: a retrospective cohort study
Dissociation and PTSD in women with a history of childhood sexual abuse: a pilot examination of a specialized inpatient unit
Resilience and Stress Among Health Care Workers Participating in the StressPal Frontline Program: Quasi-Experimental Pretest-Posttest Study
Background: Health care workers continue to experience heightened levels of distress and burnout, which contribute to higher levels of job dissatisfaction, turnover intentions, presenteeism, and staffing shortages. Objective: The aim of this study was to examine how participation in the StressPal Frontline: Essential Resilience Self-Care and Burnout Prevention program influenced health care workers’ stress and resilience. The study also sought to identify specific measures of perceived stress and resilience that were most affected by participation in the program and to explore whether pre-and-post differences varied based on participant characteristics. The StressPal Frontline program is a digital resilience intervention specifically developed for health care workers to enhance psychological flexibility and stress resilience. The self-paced training program, designed for approximately a 6-week period, consists of brief modules, follow-up resources, and a peer engagement community. Methods: A pretest-posttest quasi-experimental design was used to assess the effectiveness of the StressPal Frontline program in reducing stress and building resilience among 76 health care workers who voluntarily joined and completed the program. Outcome measures included the Perceived Stress Scale and the Brief Resilience Scale to assess participants’ perceptions of stressful situations and their ability to bounce back from stress. Descriptive statistics, correlation analysis, paired-samples 2-tailed test, and multiple regression analysis were conducted. The paired-samples test was calculated at the scale level and item level to evaluate the statistical significance of pretest and posttest mean differences, and the Cohen statistic was used as a measure of effect size. Statistical analysis for this study was conducted in Excel (Microsoft), SPSS (IBM Corp), and Jamovi (jamovi project). Results: The results indicated a 1.53-point reduction in the Perceived Stress Scale score after participating in the StressPal Frontline program, suggesting a statistically significant decline in average perceived stress due to participation in the program (=.004). The corresponding value of Cohen was 0.34, suggesting a small-to-medium effect of the intervention, StressPal Frontline program, in reducing perceived stress. For the Brief Resilience Scale, pre-and-post difference was not significant at the scale level (=.07); however, item-level analysis found significant increases in participants’ perception of their ability to bounce back quickly after hard times and handle difficult situations. No significant differences were found in outcome measures based on age, race, ethnicity, professional role, or practice setting. Conclusions: The StressPal Frontline program was associated with positive outcomes in reducing perceived stress. Our study also found no statistical differences in outcomes among participants of different age groups, races, ethnicities, occupations, genders, and practice settings. This is an important finding, as it indicates that the StressPal Frontline program may provide positive benefits for reducing stress across professions, settings, and individual characteristics. This program, along with other resources, could be implemented by health care organizations to support workers’ professional development, behavioral health, and well-being.
<img src="https://jmir-production.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/thumbs/b188f6392a855b01cd41f10741dde2b1" />
Impact of an Artificial Intelligence–Powered Clinical Decision Support System for Acute Kidney Injury Prevention in the Intensive Care Unit: Single-Center Uncontrolled Before-and-After Implementation Study
Background: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a frequent and serious complication among hospitalized patients, particularly in critical care settings, where its incidence can exceed 50%. AKI is associated with increased mortality, prolonged hospitalization, dialysis dependence, and higher health care costs. Although the KDIGO (Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes) guidelines emphasize supportive care, hemodynamic optimization, and avoidance of nephrotoxins, their implementation remains inconsistent, partly due to the lack of timely risk stratification. Recent advances in artificial intelligence have enhanced early prediction and detection of AKI, offering new opportunities to improve patient outcomes and intensive care unit (ICU) efficiency. The U-Care Renal Platform (UCRP; U-Care Medical S.r.l), a Conformité Européenne (CE)–marked artificial intelligence–powered medical device, integrates directly with the ICU electronic health record to continuously analyze patient data and predict the risk of moderate or severe AKI within 24 hours, providing actionable, guideline-based recommendations. While the predictive performance of UCRP has been validated previously, its real-world impact on clinical and operational outcomes in the ICU remains underexplored. Objective: This single-center uncontrolled before-and-after implementation study aims to evaluate the association between UCRP implementation and selected ICU clinical and operational outcomes in routine practice at SCIAS Hospital, Barcelona. Methods: This study was conducted as a retrospective service evaluation of a workflow-embedded clinical decision support system between March 2023 and March 2025. It included 202 postsurgical adult ICU patients. Outcomes of interest were assessed by comparing preimplementation and postimplementation periods. Months during which the UCRP was inactive were excluded from the analysis (total excluded duration: 10 months; 5 in the preimplementation period and 5 in the postimplementation period). The outcomes included the incidence of moderate-to-severe AKI (KDIGO stages 2 and 3), the use of nephrotoxic medications, the frequency of hypotensive episodes among patients with AKI, and the ICU length of stay. Results: During the postimplementation period, lower rates of moderate-to-severe AKI (9/99, 9.1% vs 12/103, 11.7%), nephrotoxic drug administration, and hypotensive episodes among patients with AKI were observed compared with the preimplementation period. Conclusions: Integration of the UCRP into ICU workflows was associated with differences in selected AKI-related process and intermediate clinical outcomes in this single-center uncontrolled before-and-after implementation study. However, given the study design, causal relationships cannot be established, and the findings should be interpreted as preliminary signals requiring confirmation in larger, controlled, and multicenter studies, including patient-centered outcomes.
<img src="https://jmir-production.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/thumbs/71fcf65ca89d431d076172e7f4cece6c" />
Astrocytes Preserve Memory Persistence Through Ankyrin-2 Protein in Mice
Although scientists have long studied how memories are formed in the brain, how certain memories persist over time for learning and cognitive function remains unclear.
A new study published in Nature Communications titled, “Astrocytic ankyrin-2 enables memory persistence in the mouse hippocampus,” suggests that astrocytes play a critical role in long-term memory through the regulatory protein ankyrin-2 (Ank2).
Removing Ank2 function led to significantly impaired memory in mice after after two weeks. Under normal conditions, these mice showed standard locomotion, sociability, and recent memory immediately after learning.
Astrocytes lacking Ank2 formed significantly less physical contacts with nearby engram neurons, the specialized neurons for memory storage. Additionally, the maintenance of long-term potentiation (LTP) was impaired while normal synaptic transmission remained intact. The findings suggest that astrocytes stabilize the neural circuits required for preserving memories long after they are formed.
On the molecular level, researchers found that Ank2 is required for brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) signaling through the astrocytic TrkB.T1 receptor and IP3R2-mediated calcium signaling. In the absence of Ank2, calcium signaling weakened, astrocytes failed to undergo normal structural remodeling, and showed reduced ability to maintain contacts with memory-encoding neurons.
The researchers further demonstrated that hippocampal BDNF infusion normally strengthens long-term memory persistence, but this effect disappeared when astrocytic Ank2 was deleted, showing that Ank2 is essential for BDNF-dependent memory stabilization.
To determine whether astrocytic BDNF signaling alone is sufficient to enhance memory, the team developed an optogenetic tool called Opto-T1. Activation of this pathway promoted astrocyte remodeling, maintained long-term potentiation, and significantly enhanced remote memory without affecting recent memory.
“Our findings show that astrocytes are not passive support cells, but active regulators that determine how long memories last,” said Wuhyun Koh, PhD, senior research fellow at Institute for Basic Science (IBS) and corresponding author of the study. “By identifying Ank2 as a key regulator of astrocyte remodeling and BDNF signaling, we have uncovered a new mechanism that helps stabilize long-term memories and opens new avenues for understanding and potentially treating memory disorders.”
The researchers indicate the study provides a new framework for understanding how astrocytes contribute to neurological diseases.
The post Astrocytes Preserve Memory Persistence Through Ankyrin-2 Protein in Mice appeared first on GEN – Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology News.
Memory-focused therapy: an integrated intervention to reduce trauma symptoms, maladaptive cognitive processes, and emotional distress in Afghan youth
Parental broad autism phenotype traits and executive function in families of children with autism spectrum disorder
Millions of People in Canada Are Finding AI-Enabled Support for Mental Health Effective Amid Ongoing Questions Around Trust.
(OTTAWA) July 8, 2026 — New polling shows approximately six million people in Canada used AI-enabled tools for mental health support in the past year and most find them effective. Today, the Mental Health Commission of Canada (the Commission), in partnership with Mental Health Research Canada (MHRC) and Pollara Strategic Insights, releases the first nationally representative data on how people in Canada engage with digitally supported mental health tools, including AI and virtual care, across every province and demographic.
Quick Facts:
- 1 in 7 people in Canada used AI mental health tools in the past year
- Three out of four who used AI and virtual mental health services found them effective for their well-being
- Only 14 % trust AI tools, just 2% trust them completely
- 40 % of AI users said they were more likely to seek professional care
- Nearly half (45%) who accessed mental health care did so virtually, in whole or in part
WHY IT MATTERS
People in Canada are turning to AI as a convenient way to access mental health support. AI-enabled tools may offer greater convenience and accessibility. Among those surveyed, AI is being used because it is:
- Free or low-cost; 46% of AI users cite this as the reason they use it during a time when financial stress is itself a cause for anxiety.
- Always available; 44% of AI users cite 24/7 access.
- Immediate and convenient; it can be used from anywhere without travelling or waiting for an appointment. For someone in rural Canada, it saves time and travel costs.
- Seemingly private; 39 % of AI service users cite private, anonymous support as a reason for use, while privacy and data protection remain key public concerns.
AI is most used for general well-being (42%), companionship (36%), and mild-to-moderate stress (36%), and 40% of AI users said they were more likely to seek professional care.
WHO IS USING IT AND HOW MUCH DO THEY TRUST IT?
Use is higher among people in Canada under 35 (27%; 29% among men aged 25–34), newcomers to Canada (28%), racialized people in Canada (23%), and 2SLGBTQI+ communities (20%), populations that may experience greater barriers to traditional care.
Overall, trust remains low, particularly for AI-enabled tools, where only 2% of people in Canada trust them completely. People in Canada over 55 show the lowest adoption and trust.
VIRTUAL CARE: EFFECTIVE AND MORE TRUSTED BUT FALLS SHORT OF IN-PERSON SERVICES
45% of people in Canada who used mental health services in the past year did so virtually, with 75% reporting positive outcomes. However, nearly 1 in 3 prefer a hybrid model that combines virtual and in-person services. The data signals what people in Canada need: well-designed tools for safer digital mental health care that they can trust.
THE COMMISSION OFFERS GUIDANCE FOR THE DIGITAL MENTAL HEALTH ERA
The Commission is Canada’s trusted resource for safe digital mental health — assessing apps and tools, setting evidence-based standards, and leading the national conversation on guidance for AI in mental health and substance use health care.
As virtual services and AI-enabled tools continue to expand rapidly across the mental health landscape, there is a growing need for evidence-based insight into how people in Canada engage with, understand, and perceive them. The Commission partnered with MHRC to leverage their ongoing national polling initiative and provide timely insights into usage, attitudes, and concerns related to e-mental health and AI.
The polling is clear: people in Canada want to close the gap between availability and trust. The Commission is working with the Canadian Centre on Substance Use and Addiction and collaborators, provincial governments, technology developers, and health system partners to establish guidance for AI.
“Six million people in Canada have already used AI for mental health support and most found it convenient and effective for their well-being. It is critical that AI is safe and equitable to increase public trust and reduce harms.” – Lili-Anna Pereša, President and Chief Executive Officer, Mental Health Commission of Canada
“The people turning to digitally-supported mental health tools are often those facing some of the greatest barriers to care. Making sure these tools are safe, effective, evidence-based and human-centred is a matter of equity. Ongoing research is essential to understanding where they help and where safeguards are needed.”– Akela Peoples, Chief Executive Officer, Mental Health Research Canada
About Mental Health Commission of Canada
As an independent, not-for-profit with charitable status, the Commission collaborates with leading experts and organizations nationally and internationally, including with people with lived and living experience, to develop national guidelines, standards and strategies, promote innovation and best practices, reduce stigma, increase mental health literacy, and support all levels of government to improve mental health outcomes for everyone living in Canada. The Commission is Canada’s trusted resource for digital mental health best practices with the e-Mental Health Strategy for Canada, app assessment, e-modules for e-mental health implementation, and AI guidance for mental health and substance use health.
About Mental Health Research Canada
As an independent national charity, MHRC works hard to enable a future where mental health in Canada is transformed using evidence, data and stakeholder engagement. We unite researchers, communities, and people with lived experience to bridge gaps in care through national population polling, rapid data reporting, and partnerships that inform policy to improve outcomes. Learn more at www.mhrc.ca
About the Polling
Conducted by Pollara Strategic Insights in partnership with Mental Health Research Canada and the Mental Health Commission of Canada, this national poll (n=3,519) is the first representative data on AI use for mental health in Canada. Full findings: https://mentalhealthcommission.ca/AI-polling-report
About the Funding
The views in this report solely represent the views of the Mental Health Commission of Canada. Production of this report is made possible through financial contribution from Health Canada.
Media Contact
Heather Bakken, Pendulum Group
email: heather@pendulumgroup.ca
cell: 613-406-5432
The post Millions of People in Canada Are Finding AI-Enabled Support for Mental Health Effective Amid Ongoing Questions Around Trust. appeared first on Mental Health Commission of Canada.

