Development of a User-Informed Decision Aid for Contraceptive Decision-Making Among Adolescents and Young Adults: Qualitative Study

Background: Adolescents and young adults seeking contraceptive care face many considerations related to differences in contraceptive indications and knowledge, which are often overlooked and can lead to contraceptive nonadherence or nonuse as well as adverse health outcomes. Objective: This study aimed to develop a digital decision aid that meets the contraceptive decisional needs of adolescents and young adults from diverse backgrounds. Methods: We developed a web-based decision aid using a user-centered design framework and the International Patient Decision Aid Standards. The design and development process was informed by a literature review and consultations with scientific experts, health informatics specialists, clinicians experienced in adolescent reproductive health, and a diverse group of adolescent and young adult advisors. We gathered feedback on the decision aid’s content and functionality from clinicians, adolescents, and young adult stakeholders during focus group interviews conducted across 2 user testing cycles. Each focus group was recorded and transcribed, and the data were analyzed using a focus group guide to identify key attributes, patterns, and perspectives among users. Two qualitative researchers used rapid qualitative analysis to explore and summarize findings across 4 key domains, which contributed to the refinement of the decision aid content and the improvement of its functionality. Results: Twenty-four clinicians, adolescents, and young adult participants from diverse backgrounds shared their perspectives on the decision aid’s content, relevance, design, and usability across 2 user testing cycles conducted from February 2023 to June 2024. The decision aid includes a survey, a decision algorithm that generates a summary of contraceptive method recommendations, infographics, and a health care provider summary view. The decision algorithm applies a weighted scoring system ranging from +1 or −1 to +10 or −10 for each method, reflecting the user’s primary indication for seeking contraception, contraceptive use preferences, and relevant health history. Conclusions: This approach allowed us to capture rich perspectives from a diverse group of stakeholders that accounted for the unique contraceptive decision-making needs of adolescents and young adults, resulting in a functional, youth-informed decision aid prototype, <i>MyPlanMyChoice</i>, ready for pilot and feasibility evaluation in a clinical setting.