STAT+: A decade ago, these drugs tore apart the FDA. Today, they might be some patients’ best hope 

A year after the worst day of her life, Debra Miller received a voicemail she couldn’t quite make out. In a thick accent, a man said something about research and left a phone number. She called but couldn’t get through. “I didn’t know what country code to put in,” she said.

Debra moved on, but the voice kept tumbling through her brain. She was desperate. Her first child, Hawken, had been diagnosed 13 months before with Duchenne muscular dystrophy. In blunt tones she would never forget, a doctor had told her that her 5-year-old boy would slowly lose the ability to walk and die by 18.

When she finally figured out the digits, a Dutch scientist explained he was launching a startup around one of the most counterintuitive ideas in modern genetics: that sometimes you can fix a broken gene by breaking it just a little bit more. 

That strategy, known as exon skipping, would taunt Debra for two decades, always promising a therapy just out of reach. It prompted her to raise $1.3 million for the Dutch scientist and helped turn her fledgling advocacy group, CureDuchenne, into a powerhouse. Eventually, the idea spread far beyond the Netherlands and Debra’s home in Newport Beach, Calif., stirring tenuous hope for a life-altering treatment. 

Exon-skipping drugs sparked a civil war within the Food and Drug Administration. Under pressure from advocates and companies, a top official overrode reviewers to approve the first of several candidates. One company, Sarepta Therapeutics, has since earned over $5.5 billion from from drugs that may or may not provide much benefit. 

Throughout, by the fickle winds of scientific misfortune, mother and son remained waiting — until about two and a half years ago. That’s when Hawken enrolled in a clinical trial for a new exon-skipping drug Debra helped support. The results from him and 38 other patients have since stunned some of the field’s top experts. 

Continue to STAT+ to read the full story…

Opinion: What American hospitals can learn from India about waste

The first time we stepped into an operating theater in the United States as medical students, we were shocked by the sheer amount of waste produced from just one surgery. In fact, health care is responsible for nearly 10% of total carbon emissions in the United States, contributing approximately 5 million tons annually. Thirty percent of that waste comes from operating rooms, much of it due to disposable gowns, drapes, instruments, and plastic packaging.

As we continued with our medical training, we grew used to the idea that high-quality care inevitably produces high waste. But reading several published articles on the resource efficiency of hospitals in India forced us to question that assumption. How were they providing thousands of surgeries a day with a fraction of the waste — and no compromise in safety?

Read the rest…

STAT+: Everyone agrees AI scribes are increasing health care costs. No one agrees what to do about it

To hear health systems tell the story, artificial intelligence tools like ambient scribes are helping not only reduce doctor burnout, but also increasing payments from insurers that haven’t been compensating them properly. But on insurer earnings calls, the payers position themselves as white knights sounding the alarm on providers using AI to raise health care costs to an unsustainable level.

However, at least behind closed doors, both sides appear to agree that AI scribes are driving up health care costs. 

“The investors, the health plans, and the providers, in private, were like, ‘OK, well, it’s quite clear scribes are increasing coding intensity. One hundred percent,’” said Caroline Pearson, executive director at the Peterson Health Technology Institute, describing a roundtable PHTI held earlier this year. The nonprofit institute, founded in 2023, evaluates the impact of new technologies on health care costs and quality.

Continue to STAT+ to read the full story…

Joint Statement: Disability rights in the trilogue negotiation of the Regulation on Protection of Adults

Joint Statement: Disability rights in the trilogue negotiation of the Regulation on Protection of Adults Brussels, Belgium – 8 April 2026 A group of equality organisations calls on the EU Institutions to ensure the EU’s Regulation on Protection of Adults protects the fundamental rights of persons with disabilities and older persons. The call is shared […]

The post Joint Statement: Disability rights in the trilogue negotiation of the Regulation on Protection of Adults appeared first on Mental Health Europe.

Judge refuses to block sending abortion pill by mail for now, but says FDA must finish review

A federal judge Tuesday refused to block filling prescriptions for the abortion pill mifepristone by mail across the U.S. — at least for now — in a setback to Louisiana’s effort to stifle groups that send it into states where abortion is banned.

U.S. District Judge David Joseph, who sits in Lafayette, Louisiana, ruled against Louisiana Attorney General Liz Murrill, who asked that U.S. Food and Drug Administration rules that allow mifepristone to be dispensed through the mail be paused while a challenge to those 2023 regulations moves through the courts.

Read the rest…

Telephone-Based Mental Health Promotion for Rural Women in Brazilian Agrarian Reform Communities: Pre-Post Pilot Study

Background: Women living in rural agrarian reform communities face intersecting challenges related to social, economic, racial, and gender vulnerabilities, which significantly increase their likelihood of developing physical and mental health problems. Despite the potential of telephone-based interventions to promote mental health, there is a lack of studies assessing their feasibility and effectiveness among underserved populations in Brazil. Objective: This study aimed to assess the feasibility and effectiveness of a telephone-based intervention on mental health outcomes among women living in a rural agrarian reform community in Brazil. Methods: We conducted a descriptive, prospective pilot study with a pretest and posttest design. Data were collected at 3 time points: baseline, 1 week, and 1 month after the intervention. The outcomes assessed included quality of life, social support, self-efficacy, and common mental disorder symptoms. Nonparametric tests were used to analyze the data. The intervention consisted of 3 phone calls supported by a workbook, with content based on cognitive behavioral and psychiatric nursing principles. Results: Of the 31 women enrolled, 23 (74.2%) completed all 3 phone-based sessions. There was a significant reduction in common mental disorder symptoms (Kendall =0.280; =.002), particularly in the somatic domain (=.02). Moreover, participants reported improved perceptions of the physical domain of quality of life (Kendall =0.131; =.049). All women rated the intervention positively, with more than half emphasizing its practical usefulness. Conclusions: The telephone-based intervention was feasible and showed promising results in improving mental health outcomes among women in a rural setting. These findings support integrating low-intensity, remote psychosocial strategies into primary health care, especially those led by nurses, to increase access to mental health promotion for vulnerable populations.
<img src="https://jmir-production.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/thumbs/29b6717618113fd23ab574e12f131acb" />