Angry Kids: Dealing With Explosive Behavior

When a child — even a small child — melts down and becomes aggressive, they can pose a serious risk to themselves and others, including parents and siblings.

It’s not uncommon for kids who have trouble handling their emotions to lose control and direct their distress at a caregiver — screaming and cursing, throwing dangerous objects, or hitting and biting. It can be a scary, stressful experience for you and your child, too. Children often feel sorry after they’ve worn themselves out and calmed down.

So what are you to do?

It’s helpful to first understand that behavior is communication. A child who is so overwhelmed that they are lashing out is a distressed child. They don’t have the skill to manage their feelings and express them in a more mature way. They may lack language, impulse control, or problem-solving abilities.

Sometimes parents see this kind of explosive behavior as manipulative. But kids who lash out are usually unable to handle frustration or anger in a more effective way — say, by talking and figuring out how to achieve what they want.

Nonetheless, how you react when a child lashes out has an effect on whether they will continue to respond to distress in the same way or learn better ways to handle feelings so they don’t become overwhelming.

Behavioral techniques for anger management

Here are some pointers to help kids learn techniques to regulate their emotions:

  • Stay calm. Faced with a raging child, it’s easy to feel out of control and find yourself yelling at them. But when you shout, you have less chance of reaching them. Instead, you will only be making them more aggressive and defiant. As hard as it may be, if you can stay calm and in control of your own emotions, you can be a model for your child and teach them to do the same thing.
  • Don’t give in. Don’t encourage them to continue this behavior by agreeing to what they want in order to make it stop.
  • Praise appropriate behavior. When they have calmed down, praise them for pulling themselves together. And when they do try to express their feelings verbally, calmly, or try to find a compromise on an area of disagreement, praise them for those efforts.
  • Help them practice problem-solving skills. When your child is not upset is the time to help them try out communicating their feelings and coming up with solutions to conflicts before they escalate into aggressive outbursts. You can ask them how they feel and how they think you might solve a problem.
  • Time-outs and reward systems. Time-outs for nonviolent misbehavior can work well with children younger than 7 or 8 years old. When using time-outs, be sure to be consistent with them and balance them with other, more positive forms of attention. If a child is too old for time-outs, you want to move to a system of positive reinforcement for appropriate behavior — points or tokens toward something they want.
  • Avoid triggers. Vasco Lopes, PsyD, a clinical psychologist, says most kids who have frequent meltdowns do it at very predictable times, like homework time, bedtime, or when it’s time to stop playing, whether it’s Legos or video games. The trigger is usually being asked to do something they don’t like, or to stop doing something they do like. Time warnings (“we’re going in 10 minutes”), breaking tasks down into one-step directions (“first, put on your shoes”), and preparing your child for situations (“please ask to be excused before you leave Grandma’s table”) can all help avoid meltdowns.

What kind of tantrum is it?

How you respond to a tantrum also depends on its severity. The first rule in handling nonviolent tantrums is to ignore them as often as possible, since even negative attention, like telling the child to stop, can be encouraging.

But when a child is getting physical, ignoring is not recommended since it can result in harm to others as well as your child. In this situation, Dr. Lopes advises putting the child in a safe environment that does not give them access to you or any other potential rewards.

Critics of time-outs argue that they can be emotionally isolating for kids, but research shows that they are effective and do not cause children harm. (For more on the debate around time-outs, read our full article on the topic.) However, it’s very important to use them as just one technique in a nurturing, supportive parenting strategy. Be sure to balance use of time outs with lots of praise for kids’ positive behaviors. It’s also important to manage your own stress so that kids can learn how to regulate their emotions from your positive example.

If the child is young (usually 7 or younger), try placing them in a time out chair. If they won’t stay in the chair, take them to a backup area where they can calm down on their own without anyone else in the room. Again, for this approach to work there shouldn’t be any toys or games in the area that might make it rewarding.

Your child should stay in that room for one minute and must be calm before they are allowed out. Then they should come back to the chair for time out. “What this does is gives your child an immediate and consistent consequence for their aggression and it removes all access to reinforcing things in their environment,” explains Dr. Lopes.

If you have an older child who is being aggressive and you aren’t able to carry them into an isolated area to calm down, Dr. Lopes advises removing yourself from their vicinity. This ensures that they are not getting any attention or reinforcement from you and keeps you safe. In extreme instances, it may be necessary to call 911 to ensure your and your child’s safety.

Help with behavioral techniques

If your child is doing a lot of lashing out — enough that it is frequently frightening you and disrupting your family — it’s important to get some professional help. There are good behavioral therapies that can help you and your child get past the aggression, relieve your stress, and improve your relationship. You can learn techniques for managing their behavior more effectively, and they can learn to rein in disruptive behavior and enjoy a much more positive relationship with you.

  • Parent-child interaction therapy (PCIT). PCIT has been shown to be very helpful for children between the ages of 2 and 7. The parent and child work together through a set of exercises while a therapist coaches parents through an ear piece. You learn how to pay more attention to your child’s positive behavior, ignore minor misbehaviors, and provide consistent consequences for negative and aggressive behavior, all while remaining calm.
  • Parent management training (PMT). PMT teaches similar techniques as PCIT, though the therapist usually works with parents, not the child.
  • Collaborative and Proactive Solutions (CPS). CPS is a program based on the idea that explosive or disruptive behavior is the result of lagging skills rather than, say, an attempt to get attention or test limits. The idea is to teach children the skills they lack to respond to a situation in a more effective way than throwing a tantrum.

Figuring out explosive behavior

Tantrums and meltdowns are especially concerning when they occur more often, more intensely, or past the age in which they’re developmentally expected — those terrible twos up through preschool. As a child gets older, aggression becomes more and more dangerous to you, and the child. And it can become a big problem for them at school and with friends, too.

If your child has a pattern of lashing out it may be because of an underlying problem that needs treatment. Some possible reasons for aggressive behavior include:

  • ADHD: Kids with ADHD are frustrated easily, especially in certain situations, such as when they’re supposed to do homework or go to bed.
  • Anxiety: An anxious child may keep their worries secret, then lash out when the demands at school or at home put pressure on them that they can’t handle. Often, a child who “keeps it together” at school loses it with one or both parents.
  • Undiagnosed learning disability: When your child acts out repeatedly in school or during homework time, it could be because the work is very hard for them.
  • Sensory processing issues: Some children have trouble processing the information they are taking in through their senses. Things like too much noise, crowds and even “scratchy” clothes can make them anxious, uncomfortable, or overwhelmed. That can lead to actions that leave you mystified, including aggression.
  • Autism: Children with autism spectrum disorder are often prone to meltdowns when they are frustrated or faced with unexpected change. They also often have sensory issues that make them anxious and agitated.

Given that there are so many possible causes for emotional outbursts and aggression, an accurate diagnosis is key to getting the help you need. You may want to start with your pediatrician. They can rule out medical causes and then refer you to a specialist. A trained, experienced child psychologist or psychiatrist can help determine what, if any, underlying issues are present.

When behavioral plans aren’t enough

Professionals agree, the younger you can treat a child, the better. But what about older children and even younger kids who are so dangerous to themselves and others that behavioral techniques aren’t enough to keep them and others around them safe?

  • Medication. Medication for underlying conditions such as ADHD and anxiety may make your child more reachable and teachable. Kids with extreme behavior problems are often treated with antipsychotic medications like Risperdal or Abilify. But these medications should be partnered with behavioral techniques.
  • Holds. Parent training may, in fact, include learning how to use safe holds on your child so that you can keep both them and yourself out of harm’s way.
  • Residential settings. Children with extreme behaviors may need to spend time in a residential treatment facility — sometimes, but not always, in a hospital setting. There, they receive behavioral and, most likely, pharmaceutical treatment. Therapeutic boarding schools provide consistency and structure around the clock, seven days a week. The goal is for the child to internalize self-control so they can come back home with more appropriate behavior with you and the world at large.
  • Day treatment. With day treatment, a child with extreme behavioral problems lives at home but attends a school with a strict behavioral plan. Such schools should have trained staff prepared to safely handle crisis situations.

Explosive children need calm, confident parents

It can be challenging work for parents to learn how to handle an aggressive child with behavioral approaches, but for many kids it can make a big difference. Parents who are confident, calm, and consistent can be very successful in helping children develop the anger management skills they need to regulate their own behavior.

This may require more patience and willingness to try different techniques than you might with a typically developing child, but when the result is a better relationship and happier home, it’s well worth the effort.

Frequently Asked Questions

How can you deal with children’s anger?

One way to handle a child’s anger is to stay calm when they lose their temper. Controlling your emotions sets an example for the child. You can praise them when they express their feelings calmly and when they calm themselves down after an explosion. Adults who are confident, calm, and consistent help children develop the skills to regulate their behavior.

How do I teach a child to control their anger?

In parent-child interaction therapy, a therapist coaches parents on how to pay more attention to positive behavior, ignore minor misbehaviors, and provide consistent consequences for negative and aggressive behavior, all while remaining calm. Other forms of therapy also center on teaching the parent how to model emotional stability.

How can I calm a child down when angry?

Stay calm and ensure they are in a safe space. Yelling can escalate aggression. Speak in a steady voice, avoid giving in, and use time-outs to prevent meltdowns. When they calm down, praise them for it and for expressing their emotions appropriately. If they are frequently aggressive, behavioral therapy may help.

How do I help a child with anger issues?

Children who lash out often lack the skills to manage emotions. Identifying triggers, teaching problem-solving, and using praise or rewards can encourage better behavior. Time-outs work for younger kids, while older ones may need structured reinforcement. If outbursts are severe, you might need professional help. Programs like parent-child interaction therapy (PCIT), parent management training (PMT), or collaborative and practical solutions (CPS) can help.

The post Angry Kids: Dealing With Explosive Behavior appeared first on Child Mind Institute.

<![CDATA[Phase 3 data show adjunctive seltorexant eases depression and insomnia with lessened weight gain and somnolence.]]>

Associations between childhood trauma, intolerance of uncertainty, and symptom severity in obsessive-compulsive disorder

BackgroundChildhood trauma (CT) has been associated with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), but its relationship with obsessive-compulsive symptom (OCS) severity remains inconsistent. Intolerance of uncertainty (IU) may represent one of the cognitive processes underlying this association. The present study aimed to examine differences in CT and IU between patients with OCD and healthy controls (HCs), and to test whether IU mediates the relationship between CT and OCS severity.MethodsThis study included 82 patients with OCD and 82 healthy controls (HCs) matched on age and sex. CT was assessed using the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire-33 (CTQ-33), IU using the Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale–Short Form (IUS-12), and OCS severity using the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS).ResultsPatients with OCD had significantly higher scores than HCs on all CTQ-33 subscales and on IU measures. In particular, the patient group showed higher IUS-12 total scores than the HC group (39.30 ± 10.42 vs. 32.11 ± 8.62, p < 0.001), with higher prospective anxiety (22.11 ± 5.13 vs. 20.11 ± 4.59, p = 0.009) and inhibitory anxiety scores (17.19 ± 5.99 vs. 12.00 ± 4.82, p < 0.001). Within the patient group, physical abuse was the only CT dimension significantly associated with total Y-BOCS scores (r = 0.248, p = 0.025), whereas IU was positively associated with symptom severity (IUS-12 total: r = 0.346, p = 0.001). Path analysis showed that CT was associated with IU (β = 0.238, p = 0.023), IU was associated with OCS severity (β = 0.329, p = 0.007), and the direct effect of CT on OCS severity was no longer significant after IU was included in the model (c′ = 0.209, p = 0.093), supporting partial mediation.ConclusionCT appears to be elevated in patients with OCD, although its association with symptom severity is not uniform across trauma dimensions. IU may represent an important cognitive mechanism linking CT to OCS severity. These findings suggest that assessing and addressing IU may contribute to more individualized clinical approaches in OCD.

Coproduction Without Youth? Closing the Participation Gap in Digital Mental Health Research

Young people are among the most intensive users of digital and generative artificial intelligence (GenAI)–enabled mental health tools, yet they remain underrepresented in the research and design processes that shape these technologies. Although participatory approaches such as co-design and patient and public involvement are widely endorsed as best practices, youth involvement in digital youth mental health (DYMH) research is often inconsistent, superficial, or limited to late-stage consultation. This participation gap risks producing interventions that are misaligned with young people’s lived experiences, priorities, and vulnerabilities, particularly in the context of rapidly evolving and scalable GenAI systems. This Viewpoint aims to reexamine the underlying drivers of the participation gap in DYMH research; clarify how participation is conceptualized and implemented across disciplines; and propose concrete, actionable recommendations to support more meaningful and consistent youth involvement across the research life cycle. We draw on interdisciplinary literature from digital mental health, human-computer interaction, child-computer interaction, and health research policy. Our Viewpoint integrates conceptual frameworks (eg, Lundy’s model of participation), existing reviews of co-design practices, and emerging evidence on GenAI in mental health. We adopt a life cycle–oriented perspective to examine how youth participation is distributed across stages of research and development, including problem formulation, design, implementation, and evaluation. We identify 3 interrelated drivers of the participation gap. First, conceptual and linguistic fragmentation obscures what participation entails in practice, with terms such as co-design, participatory design, user-centered design, and patient and public involvement used inconsistently across disciplines. Second, youth involvement is uneven across the research life cycle, with participation often concentrated in early ideation or usability testing but largely absent from upstream decision-making and downstream evaluation. Third, institutional barriers—including ethics review processes, consent requirements, funding constraints, and adult-centric research norms—systematically limit meaningful youth partnership. These challenges are amplified in the context of GenAI, where opaque “black box” systems, simulated therapeutic interactions, and rapid deployment cycles introduce distinct risks if youth perspectives are not integrated. We propose a set of minimum expectations to address these gaps, including explicit specification of participatory models, life cycle mapping of youth involvement, reporting of youth influence on decisions, dedicated funding for participation, proportional ethics frameworks, and mechanisms for youth-informed governance of GenAI systems. Closing the participation gap in DYMH research is both an ethical imperative and a practical necessity. Moving beyond aspirational commitments requires embedding youth participation as a standard, resourced, and accountable component of research, design, and governance. In the context of rapidly evolving digital and GenAI technologies, failure to do so risks producing interventions that are scalable but not safe, credible, or responsive to the needs of young people.
<img src="https://jmir-production.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/thumbs/67c65c203969ea3255b58718960137bf" />

Supporting Student Mental Health With the Safespace Generative AI Chatbot: Mixed Methods Feasibility Study

Background: Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) chatbots have the potential to provide personalized mental health support to individuals at scale. Objective: This study evaluates the feasibility and usage patterns of the Safespace GenAI chatbot, an artificial intelligence (AI)–driven smartphone app that offers a large language model–powered interactive chatbot to support mental health. Methods: Using a mixed methods approach, we explored baseline attitudes toward GenAI chatbots and chatbot usage patterns, conducted a qualitative content analysis of participants’ experiences, and descriptively assessed patterns related to preintervention depressive symptoms. The study included an initial sample of 42 university students, 20 of whom actively used the chatbot over 2 to 4 weeks, generating 286 user-chatbot interactions. Results: Preintervention surveys indicated that the majority of participants anticipated that the chatbot would be helpful (27/42, 64%) and that they trusted its privacy safeguards (39/42, 93%). Usage patterns suggested that the highest levels of interaction occurred early in the morning and late at night, when peer and professional support may be inaccessible. The qualitative analysis indicated that participants appreciated using the chatbot for reflection as a blended-care tool between their counseling sessions, while also naming technical barriers and specific design needs required to sustain engagement. In addition, our exploratory analyses descriptively showed that participants with elevated depression scores engaged in emotional disclosure during 99% (38 sessions with 8 participants) of their sessions, compared to 84% (26 sessions of 12 participants) of those with low symptoms. Due to the small sample size, future adequately powered studies are needed to inferentially examine these observed patterns. Conclusions: These findings provide initial insights into the usage and engagement dynamics of the Safespace GenAI chatbot and highlight directions for future research to optimize GenAI-driven mental health interventions. Trial Registration: AEA Registry AEARCTR-0013291; https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.13291-1.0
<img src="https://jmir-production.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/thumbs/8ea8d6d9a0e05f3fdb856f007cfd4549" />

Global research landscape, knowledge structure, and emerging trends in adverse childhood experiences and personality disorders: a bibliometric analysis

BackgroundThe relationship between adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) and personality disorders (PDs) has attracted sustained attention in psychiatry, psychology, and public health. Existing studies have mainly examined epidemiological associations, specific PDs diagnoses, or mechanisms, whereas bibliometric evidence mapping the field’s knowledge structure and thematic evolution remains limited. This study aimed to characterize trends, contributors, collaboration networks, core themes, and frontiers in ACEs–PDs research.MethodsEnglish-language publications on ACEs and PDs were retrieved from Web of Science Core Collection, Scopus, and PubMed from inception to December 31, 2025. After year screening, document-type filtering, and deduplication, 5,084 records were included. Bibliometric analyses were performed using R, VOSviewer, and CiteSpace. The merged dataset was used to examine annual trends, countries/regions, institutions, authors, journals, and keyword co-occurrence, while WoSCC records were used for co-citation analysis, keyword clustering, and burst detection.ResultsACEs–PDs research showed sustained growth, with a marked increase after 2000. The United States occupied a central position in publication output, citation impact, and international collaboration, while the United Kingdom, Germany, Canada, the Netherlands, and Australia also showed strong influence. Harvard University, the University of London, and Ruprecht Karls University Heidelberg were leading institutions; Zanarini M, Fonagy P, Schmahl C, Paris J, and Kleindienst N were key contributors. Influential journals mainly covered psychiatry, personality disorders, child maltreatment, trauma, and developmental psychopathology. Keyword analyses identified childhood adversity, personality disorder, borderline personality disorder, depression, childhood sexual abuse, and post-traumatic stress disorder as core themes. VOSviewer and CiteSpace analyses indicated that hotspots have expanded from childhood abuse, PDs diagnosis, and psychiatric comorbidity to emotion dysregulation, non-suicidal self-injury, social support, functional connectivity, early intervention, and mechanism validation. Highly cited publications revealed a knowledge base centered on childhood abuse/trauma, borderline personality disorder, psychiatric comorbidity, emotion regulation, and neurobiological mechanisms.ConclusionThis study maps development and knowledge structure of ACEs–PDs research. Findings suggest a shift from exposure–outcome association studies toward comorbidity, intermediate phenotypes, neurobiological mechanisms, and clinical translation. Future research should strengthen longitudinal and cross-cultural designs, consider ACE type, timing, duration, and severity, and integrate neuroimaging, inflammatory, epigenetic, and clinical-course phenotypes.

Shared reading is associated with fewer emotional/behavioral problems and better prosocial behavior in preschool children: a cross-sectional study in western China

BackgroundThe home literacy environment, particularly shared reading, plays a critical role in preschool children’s cognitive and socioemotional development. However, its associations with emotional and behavioral problems remain underexplored in large-scale studies. This study examined the relationship between shared reading and emotional/behavioral problems as well as prosocial behavior in preschool children.MethodsA cross-sectional study was conducted using stratified cluster sampling across 189 kindergartens in a major city in western China. A total of 21,366 parent-child pairs were included. Shared reading was assessed with the reading subscale of the StimQ-P (score range 0–22), which evaluates quantity, diversity of concepts and content, and interactivity quality. Emotional and behavioral problems were measured using the parent-reported Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ). Multivariate logistic regression and generalized additive models were employed to examine associations, adjusting for child age, gender, parental socioeconomic factors, lifestyle variables, and parental mental health (CES-D).ResultsHigher shared reading scores were significantly associated with lower odds of emotional/behavioral problems (adjusted OR = 0.96 per point increase, 95% CI: 0.95–0.97, P < 0.0001) and higher odds of adequate prosocial behavior (adjusted OR = 1.09, 95% CI: 1.08–1.10, P < 0.0001) in fully adjusted models. All four dimensions of shared reading showed independent associations. Nonlinear analyses revealed threshold effects, with associations becoming stronger above approximately 18 points for total difficulties and 15 points for prosocial behavior. These associations were largely consistent across subgroups after correction for multiple testing.ConclusionIn this large cross-sectional study conducted in western China, higher levels of shared reading were associated with lower odds of emotional/behavioral problems and higher odds of prosocial behaviors among preschool children. The results suggest possible threshold patterns in these associations. However, given the cross-sectional nature of the study, causality cannot be established.