Background: Digital mental health technologies (DMHTs) are playing an increasing role in mental health services. The quality of evidence for DMHTs is variable, and there are concerns that evidence is not sufficient to support decision-making. Objective: This study used a cross-sectional analysis of evidence supporting DMHTs included in National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) evaluations to examine the strength of evidence available for decision-making. Methods: We identified all NICE evaluations relating to DMHTs by reviewing details of published NICE evaluations on the NICE website. From each of these evaluations, we identified included DMHTs and reviewed committee documentation to identify studies that provided supporting evidence for each of these technologies. We extracted information on a series of items relating to study quality and summarized the characteristics of evidence both at the level of individual studies and across the package of evidence from multiple studies supporting DMHTs. We also identified key evidence gaps in available evidence. Results: We included nine NICE evaluations relating to anxiety, depression, psychosis, insomnia, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and tic disorders. These evaluations included 30 DMHTs and referenced 78 supporting studies. We identified common evidence gaps relating to effectiveness compared to relevant comparators, use of appropriate outcomes, including health-related quality of life, cost of delivery, and impact on resource use, and reporting of adverse events. Conclusions: Our study highlights that some DMHTs have been supported by high-quality studies and that evidence to support DMHTs is likely to be developed across a series of studies. However, there are often key evidence gaps that need to be addressed to provide a stronger case for adoption. Developers should ensure that they consider these gaps while planning evidence generation, and where possible, address them earlier in the product lifecycle.
<img src="https://jmir-production.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/thumbs/825f13db8cbad54213afa5c433d7adde" />
Medtech OEMs face a rare but closing window of opportunity
This is a manufacturing decision you can’t defer in 2026. Mark Freitas, Alvarez & Marsal Private-equity-backed CDMO platforms are aging into exits. OEMs who know what they want will move first. The 2022-2024 structural reset is over and the financing gap is narrowing. The sector has emerged from a period of value depression and as…
The post Medtech OEMs face a rare but closing window of opportunity appeared first on Medical Design and Outsourcing.
A Gamified Pain Management Intervention for Adults With Chronic Pain in Mainland China: Single-Arm Pre-Post Pilot Study With Machine Learning Predictive Modeling
Synaptic remodeling and the female depression exposome: a mini-review of neuroendocrine, epigenetic, and social determinants
Stage-specific ERP correlates of audiovisual facial emotion processing across depressive tendencies
Analysis of the prevalence of dyslipidemia in early-onset schizophrenia patients and its correlation with clinical characteristics
Biomarkers for complex post-traumatic stress disorder: translational and evolutionary perspectives
Esketamine ameliorates depression-like behavior in mice via modulation of the NRG1–ErbB4 pathway
Vitamin A status is associated with sleep, clock genes, and symptoms in children with autism spectrum disorder
Methylome-Wide Association Study of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder
Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is a debilitating psychiatric condition influenced by both genetic and environmental risk factors. Epigenetic modifications, such as DNA methylation, may offer insights into biologically meaningful differences associated with the disorder.

