Biomarkers of ASD/ADHD and Factors Affecting Anxiety and Depression in Children and Young Adults

Conditions: ADHD – Attention Deficit Disorder With Hyperactivity; Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD); Developmental Coordination Disorder (DCD)

Sponsors: University of Exeter; University of Southampton; University of Dublin, Trinity College; Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy; Jimma University; FUNDACION PARA LA INVESTIGACION HOSPITAL CLINICO SAN CARLOS; The International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh; University of Bari Aldo Moro

Not yet recruiting

Ketamine With Dialectical Behavioural Therapy (DBT) for Suicidality in Individuals With Treatment-Resistant Depression and Borderline Personality Disorder (KET-DBT)

Conditions: Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD); Treatment-Resistant Major Depressive Disorder; Treatment-resistant Bipolar Depression; Major Depressive Disorder (MDD); Bipolar Disorder (BD); Bipolar Disorder I or II; Suicidal Ideation

Interventions: Drug: Ketamine Hydrochloride; Drug: Midazolam Hydrochloride; Behavioral: Dialectical Behavioral Therapy (DBT)

Sponsors: Joshua Rosenblat

Not yet recruiting

Anxiety and Depression Associated With the Dependent Use of Generative AI in Medical Students: Cross-Sectional Study

Background: The growing integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in higher education has transformed learning processes but also raised concerns about potential mental health risks. Medical students represent a particularly vulnerable group due to high academic stress and increasing reliance on generative AI tools for study and decision-making tasks. Despite this, the relationship between AI dependence and psychological distress remains underexplored in Latin American contexts. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the association between generative AI dependence and levels of stress, anxiety, and depression among medical students. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted with 187 human medicine students from a Peruvian university during the first academic semester of 2025. The Dependence on Artificial Intelligence Scale and the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale–21 were applied. Negative binomial regression models, both crude and adjusted for sex, age, income, and year of study, were used to assess associations, reporting rate ratios (RRs) and 95% CIs. Results: Participants had a median age of 22 (IQR 19‐24) years, and 58.8% (110/187) were female. The median Dependence on Artificial Intelligence Scale score was 10 (IQR 7‐14). Generative AI dependence showed significant correlations with anxiety (ρ=0.336, 95% CI 0.22‐0.44) and depression (ρ=0.316, 95% CI 0.20‐0.43) and a smaller correlation with stress (ρ=0.277, 95% CI 0.16‐0.39). In the adjusted regression models, each 1-point increase in generative AI dependence was associated with a 5% higher expected anxiety score (RR 1.05, 95% CI 1.01‐1.09; =.01) and a 4% higher depression score (RR 1.04, 95% CI 1.01‐1.08; =.03), whereas the association with stress was positive but nonsignificant (RR 1.03, 95% CI 1.00‐1.07; =.08). Fifth-year students had significantly greater anxiety levels than their sixth-year peers (RR 1.82, 95% CI 1.09‐3.01; =.02). No significant effects were observed for sex, age, or income. Conclusions: This study empirically examined generative AI dependence as a distinct behavioral construct and its association with mental health symptoms in medical students. Unlike prior research, this study evaluated psychological dependence on generative AI and modeled its relationship with anxiety and depression using appropriate count-based regression techniques. By providing early evidence from a Latin American context, it contributes to the emerging field of digital mental health and medical education research. These findings underscore the need for universities to promote balanced and responsible AI use, integrate digital literacy with mental health support strategies, and develop preventive policies that mitigate potential maladaptive reliance on generative AI tools.
<img src="https://jmir-production.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/thumbs/63c5cab6261231002a3eb9a11707995f" />

Psilocybin-Induced Brain Changes May Explain Therapeutic Effects

Researchers at University of California, San Francisco and Imperial College London have shown that a single dose of psilocybin, the psychedelic compound found in magic mushrooms, causes likely anatomical brain changes that last for up to a month after the experience.

The study, involving healthy volunteers who had never taken a psychedelic, links temporary shifts in brain “entropy”—which is the diversity of neural activity occurring in the brain—to insight. This suggests the psychedelic trip itself is important to the drug’s longer term therapeutic effects.

The researchers found that a high dose of psilocybin led to increased entropy in the minutes and hours after taking the drug. The degree of entropy predicted how much insight, or emotional self-awareness, the participants felt the next day; and this, in turn, forecasted improvements in their sense of wellbeing a month later.

The findings may help to explain psilocybin’s therapeutic effects on conditions such as depression, anxiety, and addiction. “Psychedelic means ‘psyche-revealing,’ or making the psyche visible,” said senior author Robin Carhart-Harris, PhD, the Ralph Metzner distinguished professor of neurology at UCSF. “Our data shows that such experiences of psychological insight relate to an entropic quality of brain activity and how both are involved in causing subsequent improvements in mental health. It suggests that the trip—and its correlates in the brain—is a key component of how psychedelic therapy works.”  Carhart-Harris is senior and corresponding author of the team’s published paper in Nature Communications, titled “Human brain changes after first psilocybin use.”

“Psychedelics have robust effects on acute brain function and long-term behavior but whether they also cause enduring functional and anatomical brain changes is largely unknown,” the authors wrote. Psilocybin is the precursor of the compound psilocin, a serotonin receptor agonist. “Converging evidence supports a role for serotonin 2A receptor  (5-HT2AR) agonism in eliciting the characteristic brain and subjective effects of this and related psychedelics in humans,” the team continued.

For their newly reported study, Carhart-Harris and colleagues carried out an exploratory, placebo-controlled, within-patient study in 28 psychedelic-naïve participants who each received a single, high-dose (25 mg) of psilocybin. The researchers used an assortment of brain imaging and brain measurement techniques, some of which were carried out during the peak of the psychedelic experience, as well as before and one-month after drug administration. “This was an exploratory, hypothesis-generating mechanistic study in healthy volunteers,” the authors noted. None of the 28 people in the study had a diagnosed mental health condition, which gave the scientists greater freedom to do more testing.

In the first part of the experiment the subjects were given a 1 mg dose of psilocybin, which the researchers regarded as a placebo, and were then monitored with EEG, which records brain activity from electrodes on the scalp.  Over the next few weeks, the researchers measured their subjects’ psychological insight, wellbeing, and cognitive ability. They examined brain activity with functional MRI (fMRI) and brain connectivity with diffusion tensor imaging (DTI).

One month after the placebo, the subjects were given 25 mg of psilocybin, a dose capable of eliciting a strong psychedelic trip. During the experience, researchers again measured the subjects’ brain activity with EEG, and in the following weeks they repeated the same tests they had given after the 1 mg dose.

This enabled the scientists to compare the effects of the psychedelic trip on the brain and mind to the effects of the placebo. “The multimodal neuroimaging design allowed us to observe changes in brain function and (potential) anatomy from 1-h (EEG) to 1-month (DTI) after high-dose psilocybin,” they explained.

The investigators found that within 60 minutes of taking the 25 mg dose of psilocybin, EEG revealed higher entropy, suggesting that the brain was processing a richer body of information under the psychedelic. A month later, the researchers looked at their subjects’ brains using DTI, which measures the diffusion of water along neural tracts in the brain, and found that they were denser and had more integrity. This is the opposite of what happens in aging, which makes these tracts more diffuse.

The researchers cautioned that more work needs to be done to better understand the meaning of this finding, but the result is a never-before-seen sign of how psychedelics can change the brain. ”The inclusion of DTI enabled us to test for long-term changes in the integrity of white matter tracts post psilocybin,” the authors stated. “Results revealed decreased axial diffusivity in prefrontal-subcortical tracts 1-month post 25mg psilocybin.”

The day after the 25 mg dose, all but one of the 28 subjects rated the trip as the “single most” unusual state of consciousness they had ever experienced. The remaining person rated it as among their top five. The study participants said they had experienced more psychological insight after taking the 25 mg of psilocybin than they had after the 1 mg placebo.  The subjects also reported increased wellbeing two and four weeks after the study. This was measured from responses to statements such as, “I’ve been feeling optimistic about the future,” and “I’ve been dealing with problems well.”

As the scientists noted in their paper, “A predictive relationship was also found between brain entropy and longer-term mental-health changes—namely, improved wellbeing. Improved wellbeing could be predicted directly from acute increases in brain entropy as early as 1-h post dosing.”

A month after the study the study individuals also scored better on a test of cognitive flexibility.  “Psilocybin seems to loosen up stereotyped patterns of brain activity and give people the ability to revise entrenched patterns of thought,” said first author Taylor Lyons, PhD, a research associate at Imperial College London. “The fact that these changes track with insight and improved well‑being is especially exciting.”

The scientists found that the subjects who had experienced the largest increases in brain entropy in the minutes to hours after taking psilocybin were the most likely to have increased insight the next day and increased wellbeing a month later. The researchers concluded that improved wellbeing was driven by the experience of insight.

The authors suggest that the study findings could improve treatment for people with mental illness using psilocybin, for example, by ensuring that the right dosage is used to produce the right amount of brain entropy to promote insight. “We already knew psilocybin could be helpful for treating mental illness,” Carhart-Harris said. “But now we have a much better understanding of how.”

In their paper the team concluded, “The present multi-modal neuroimaging study in healthy participants sheds light on the brain effects of first-time high-dose psychedelic use and the therapeutic action of psilocybin-therapy, suggesting that therapeutically relevant changes—i.e., improved wellbeing—can be forecast via an acute human brain action, i.e., an entropic brain effect, that is well-known to relate to the psychedelic experience … Results support a role for psychological insight in mediating the causal association between the entropic brain effect and potentially enduring improvements in wellbeing.”

The post Psilocybin-Induced Brain Changes May Explain Therapeutic Effects appeared first on GEN – Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology News.

Statement on Mental Health and Access to Evidence-Based Care

The IOCDF is proud to be a member of the Mental Health Liaison Group, which distributed the below statement. To learn more about appropriate treatment for OCD, including the use of medication and SSRIs, visit IOCDF’s Treatment Guide.

Following the MAHA Institute May 4, 2026, Summit entitled, “Mental Health and Overmedicalization,” and HHS’ MAHA Action Plan to Curb Psychiatric Overprescribing, the Mental Health Liaison Group (MHLG)— a nonprofit coalition of national organizations representing people with mental health and substance use conditions, family members and caregivers, providers of mental health and substance use treatment and support, advocates, and other stakeholders— reaffirms that improving mental health outcomes requires expanding access to comprehensive, evidence-based care.

MHLG recognizes that mental health care should be appropriate, individualized, and guided by clinical expertise and informed patient decision-making. The goal is the right care, delivered at the right time and tailored to each person’s unique needs.

A strong body of evidence supports a range of effective, individualized treatments, including psychotherapy and, when clinically appropriate, medications such as Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRIs). These treatments are effective for many individuals when appropriately prescribed, monitored, and supported as part of a comprehensive care plan. Individuals should be supported in working with their health care providers to determine and refine over time the care plan, including the benefits and risks, that best meets their needs, and engage in medical professional recommendation-based treatment, which for many may include psychotherapy and medication as part of a comprehensive approach to care.

Public discussion of mental health treatment should be informed by scientific evidence to support informed decision-making and patient-centered care. Misinformation or claims not supported by evidence may discourage individuals from seeking or continuing treatment, particularly at a time when many already face significant barriers to care.

MHLG supports policies that support ongoing research to expand access to comprehensive, evidence-based mental health services, reduce stigma, and strengthen the ability of individuals to initiate and remain engaged in appropriate care across the continuum of prevention, treatment, crisis and recovery. These priorities are consistent with MHLG’s principles, available at https://www.mhlg.org/about-us/

MHLG stands ready to engage with the Administration and policymakers as they consider and advance approaches impacting mental health care.


The Mental Health Liaison Group (MHLG) is a nonprofit coalition of national organizations representing people with mental health and substance use conditions, family members and caregivers, providers of mental health and substance use treatment and support, advocates, and other stakeholders committed to strengthening Americans’ access to mental health and substance use care. As trusted leaders in the field, our 100+ member organizations are dedicated to elevating the national conversation around mental health and substance use. Together, we work to advance federal policies that support prevention, early intervention, treatment, crisis response, and recovery services and supports.

The post Statement on Mental Health and Access to Evidence-Based Care appeared first on International OCD Foundation.

Genotype-Guided Antidepressants Could Have Long-Term Benefits

Prescribing antidepressants according to a patient’s genetic makeup could help manage depressive symptoms in the long-term, a clinical trial suggests.

The findings, in JAMA Network Open, suggest pharmacogenetic guidance could have extended benefits, which may not be apparent early on.

Primary results did not indicate that genotype-guided SSRI treatment was better than usual care at three months in A Depression and Opioid Pragmatic Trial in Pharmacogenetics (ADOPT PGx).

However, significantly more patients receiving genotype-guided therapy achieved the secondary endpoint of depression remission at six months.

“Although outcomes were similar early in treatment, differences emerged over time,” noted Kathryn Blake, PharmD, from Nemours Center for Pharmacogenomics and Translational Research in Jacksonville, Florida, and colleagues.

“These findings suggest a possible longer-term clinical benefit and indicate that future studies should focus on evaluating the durability and long-term impact of genotype-guided prescribing in the management of depressive symptoms.”

SSRIs are the most common pharmacotherapy for depression and variants in cytochrome P450 enzymes CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 can affect their metabolism, influencing exposure to this medication.

Indeed, guidelines from the Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) provide recommendations for SSRI prescribing when genotype information is available.

However, most psychiatry experts and practice guidelines for treating depression have not yet endorsed pharmacogenetic-informed therapy, citing insufficient evidence.

ADOPT PGx was a set of three randomized clinical trials, designed to test whether routine use of pharmacogenetic testing improves medication response among patients with depression, acute pain, or chronic pain.

The ADOPT PGx Depression trial included 221 children and 1239 adults, aged eight years or older who had experienced depression for three months or longer.

A total of 692 patients (47.4%) had an actionable phenotype, of whom 351 (50.7%) were assigned to the intervention, and 341 (49.3%) to usual care.

Among this group, two-thirds reported having depressive symptoms for more than two years, and three quarters were female. The vast majority were on pharmacologic treatment, at 87.1%, with just over half receiving nonpharmacologic treatment.

Participants were randomly assigned to genotype-guided SSRI prescribing or usual care to examine whether pharmacogenetic guidance improves depression over six months.

At three months, there were no significant differences between the intervention and usual care groups in the primary endpoint of change in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) depression T scores among patients with an actionable phenotype.

At this timepoint, there were also no differences in the secondary outcome of adverse effect severity.

However, another secondary endpoint of depression remission according to a PROMIS depression T-score of 16 or less was more likely with the intervention than usual care, at 48.3% (153 of 317 patients) versus 39.4%. (122 of 310 patients).

Based on this, the authors proposed: “These findings suggest that pharmacogenetic testing, including evaluation for CYP2D6 enzyme inhibition (phenoconversion), may offer meaningful benefit with longer follow-up.”

The post Genotype-Guided Antidepressants Could Have Long-Term Benefits appeared first on Inside Precision Medicine.

Brief report: joint trajectories of anxiety and depression symptoms in an inception cohort of autistic youth

Background and AimsAnxiety and depression symptoms are common among autistic youth, yet little is known about the pattern and relationship of their trajectories from childhood into adolescence, a period of increasing social and academic demands.MethodsThis study used parallel process latent growth curve models to examine joint trajectories, including initial levels and rate of change in caregiver-reported depression and anxiety symptoms across age 7–16 within an inception cohort of autistic youth with varied communication abilities. We also examined autistic traits, sex assigned at birth, emotional reactivity and communication ability as potential predictors. Child anxiety and depression symptoms were estimated from Child Behavior Checklist Anxiety and Affective Problems subscales, completed by caregivers approximately annually.ResultsWhereas anxiety symptoms were relatively stable from childhood into adolescence, depression symptoms increased on average; significant heterogeneity of individual trajectories underlaid these overall trends. Findings indicated cross-sectional and longitudinal co-occurrence of anxiety and depression symptoms. Greater autistic traits and emotional reactivity correlated with greater initial anxiety and depression symptoms, but not their trajectories. Stronger communication ability correlated with more initial anxiety, but decreasing anxiety symptoms over time.ConclusionsFindings indicate group-level changes in depression symptoms and synchronous evolution of anxiety and depression symptoms in autistic youth across childhood and adolescence. This indicates the importance of joint monitoring of anxiety and depression symptoms in this period, with changes being potentially informative for early detection and intervention. Considering how anxiety symptom presentation may evolve across development may be a helpful next step to identifying at-risk subgroups.

Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on autism spectrum disorder service providers in Qatar: challenges, insights, and lessons learned

PurposeThe COVID-19 pandemic disrupted essential services, posing unique challenges for individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) who depend on consistent, specialized support. Service providers faced unique challenges in adapting to remote delivery methods, highlighting the fragility of existing systems during crises. This study explored the experiences of ASD service providers in Qatar during the COVID-19 pandemic.MethodsAn online survey of 66 ASD service providers in Qatar was conducted. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, chi-square, and likelihood ratio tests, with qualitative responses assessed through thematic analysis.ResultsMost service providers (90.9%) worked remotely during the pandemic, with 81.8% engaging in online services. Providers reported significant skill regression in individuals with ASD. Stress levels were notably high (42.4%) and significantly associated with emotional tolls [p = 0.017, LR = 4.887], financial strains [p = 0.008, LR = 4.337], and personal challenges [p = 0.008, LR = 3.203]. Thematic analysis revealed decreased therapy effectiveness and difficulties in balancing work with family responsibilities.ConclusionThese findings suggest the importance of adaptive service delivery systems that maintain continuity of care during crises. Strengthening autism service infrastructure and developing resilient models are essential to safeguard autism support for future emergencies.

Real-world use of brexpiprazole during inpatient treatment for schizophrenia: continuation, discontinuation, and concomitant psychotropics

IntroductionIn the treatment of schizophrenia, antipsychotics used during acute inpatient care must control acute symptoms while remaining sufficiently tolerable to support treatment beyond the acute phase. Brexpiprazole, a serotonin-dopamine activity modulator may be one such option; however, its real-world use and short-term continuation in acute inpatient settings remain insufficiently characterized.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective observational study of inpatients with DSM-5 schizophrenia treated with brexpiprazole at a university hospital in Japan between June 2018 and July 2024. The index date (week 0) was defined as the date of brexpiprazole initiation during the index hospitalization. The primary outcome was brexpiprazole continuation at week 8. We compared baseline demographic and treatment-related variables between the continuation and discontinuation groups and summarized reasons for discontinuation from electronic medical records. As a secondary exploratory analysis, we examined longitudinal changes in Clinical Global Impressions–Severity scale (CGI-S) and Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) total scores (weeks 0/4/8) in the continuation group using a linear mixed-effects model including time, concomitant psychotropic medication status, and their interaction.ResultsSixty-seven patients were included. Baseline illness severity was substantial (median CGI-S 5.0 [IQR 5.0–6.0]; mean BPRS total 58.5 ± 9.6). Concomitant psychotropic medications were common. Thirty-six patients continued brexpiprazole to week 8 (53.7%). In unadjusted exploratory comparisons, continuation was associated with the female sex (p = 0.036), lower prior chlorpromazine-equivalent dose (p = 0.015), and shorter duration of untreated psychosis (p = 0.003), with a trend toward shorter duration since onset (p = 0.073). The most frequent reason for discontinuation was adverse events (n = 10, 32.3%), most commonly akathisia (n = 6), followed by insufficient efficacy (n = 9, 29.0%) and patient preference/refusal (n = 7, 22.6%). In exploratory mixed-effects analyses within the continuation group, CGI-S and BPRS total scores decreased over time, with significant group-by-time interactions by concomitant medication status. However, between-group differences should be interpreted cautiously.DiscussionThis study describes 8-week continuation and reasons for discontinuation of brexpiprazole in acute inpatient schizophrenia care. Given the retrospective single-center design and potential selection/information bias and unmeasured confounding, further studies are warranted to clarify its clinical positioning in real-world practice.