Calming Minds Study
Interventions: Behavioral: Be Specific; Behavioral: Be Kind; Behavioral: Be Present; Behavioral: Break Habit; Behavioral: Psychoeducation
Sponsors: University of California, Los Angeles; University of Exeter
Not yet recruiting
Phenotype, Genetics, and Interpretation: Further Considerations on Atypical Depression
We read with great interest the recent article by Shin et al. (1). The authors leveraged the substantial Australian Genetics of Depression Study (AGDS) cohort to provide compelling evidence for the clinical and biological validity of the atypical depression subtype. Their integrative analysis of clinical features, polygenic scores (PGSs) for mental, metabolic, and circadian traits, and self-reported treatment outcomes is a significant contribution to the field. The particularly robust finding of an association between a genetic predisposition for eveningness (lower-chronotype PGS) and atypical depression, which persisted after adjustment for body mass index (BMI), is noteworthy and points to a potentially core, BMI-independent pathway.
Reply to: Phenotype, Genetics, and Interpretation: Further Considerations on Atypical Depression
We thank Li and Chen for their thoughtful and constructive engagement with our work (1). They raise three important conceptual and methodological points concerning the operationalization of phenotypes, interpretation of body mass index (BMI)–adjusted sensitivity analyses, and future analytical directions, which we discuss below.
Comorbidity alters the genetic relationship between anxiety disorders and major depression
The extensive genetic overlap between anxiety disorders (ANX) and major depression (MD) may partly reflect inclusion of comorbid cases in genome-wide association studies (GWAS). We investigated this genetic relationship between ANX and MD with and without mutual comorbidity.

