CRISPR at 25: The Past, Present, and Future of Genome Editing


Panelists:

Image of Rodolphe Barrangou, PhD

Rodolphe Barrangou, PhD

North Carolina State University

Panelist

Image of Rodolphe Barrangou, PhD

Rodolphe Barrangou, PhD

Rodolphe Barrangou, PhD, is the T. R. Klaenhammer Distinguished Professor at North Carolina State University, where he leads the CRISPR Lab. Rodolphe spent nine years at Danisco and DuPont, where he made seminal contributions in the functional characterization of CRISPR as a microbial immune system. He has been at NC State since 2013.

For his CRISPR work, Rodolphe has received several international awards, notably the Canada Gairdner International Award, and has been elected to the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, and the National Academy of Inventors. Rodolphe is a scientific co-founder of Intellia Therapeutics, Locus Biosciences, TreeCo, Ancilia Biosciences, and CRISPR Biotechnologies, and an advisor to Inari and the IGI. He is also the founding Editor in Chief of The CRISPR Journal (published by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., a Sage partner), which launched in 2018.

Rodolphe holds a degree from Paris Descartes University and a PhD in functional genomics from NC State.



Broadcast Date: 

  • Time: 

It has been almost 25 years since the acronym “CRISPR” was first coined. Since then, CRISPR has become a household word, a star of books and films, and a Nobel Prize–winning discovery. This powerful and disruptive genome editing technology has transformed countless fields, including gene therapy, xenotransplantation, de-extinction and agbiotech. Researchers continue to build on the CRISPR chassis, devising new platforms for bespoke genome editing. But major questions remain around clinical safety, commercial development, ethical deployment, and regulatory oversight.

In the first of a new series of GEN Keynote Webinars, Professor Rodolphe Barrangou, PhD (North Carolina State; EIC, The CRISPR Journal) offers a front-row perspective of the CRISPR revolution, the seminal advances, clinical highlights, and rising applications. Almost two decades ago, Barrangou provided the first experimental demonstration of the functional role of CRISPR. With numerous advisory and entrepreneurial activities in the gene editing space, Barrangou is the ideal guide to discuss CRISPR’s progress in the clinic; the state of the CRISPR toolbox; and the regulatory roadblocks and ethical challenges that will shape the application of CRISPR in agbiotech, germline editing, and other arenas.

Registration for this GEN Keynote Webinar is free. Following this live presentation, Dr. Barrangou will answer audience questions.

Produced with support from:

Elevate bio logo

The post CRISPR at 25: The Past, Present, and Future of Genome Editing appeared first on GEN – Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology News.

In Conversation with Haijiao Liu, PhD

Haijiao Liu, PhD
Haijiao Liu, PhD

As a postdoctoral researcher at the University of Pennsylvania, Haijiao Liu, PhD, helped advance tumor-on-a-chip technology, a feat of bioengineering that mimics the microenvironment of malignant human tumors. Led by Dan Dongeun Huh, PhD, a Penn Engineering professor and trailblazer of organ-on-a-chip technology, Liu and his team explanted lung adenocarcinoma tumors onto the transparent chips to test their perfusion with chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells. Their findings were published in October in Nature Biotechnology, with Liu as first author.

Now on paternity leave in Toronto, Liu spoke with Lindsey Leake about the implications of this work, the challenges inherent to tumor-on-a-chip studies, and his plans to launch a lab of his own this fall.

Q: Walk me through the creation of the tumor-on-a-chip. What went into its design?

Haijiao Liu: It’s essentially inspired by the need for alternative tumor models. This is speaking to the traditionally used animal tumor models and some existing in vitro tumor models, especially for the study of immunotherapies.

For example, when I started at Penn around 2018, Penn Medicine was pioneering this immunotherapy called CAR T-cell therapy, which is basically aiming to harness the patient’s own immune system, specifically the patient’s own T cells, to help fight the cancer. Penn Medicine was demonstrating huge clinical success using this CAR T therapy to treat blood cancers, such as leukemias and lymphomas. In a huge contrast to this, the solid cancer arena has seen a limited response from this new immunotherapy. So there’s this great need to study why this has not been successful, and that comes down to the consensus that the solid tumor has this really complex microenvironment.

In the category called tumor-on-a-chip, people try to control the cultural environment, the biochemical and biophysical environment of tumor cell cultures. We can use this for simple drug testing—see how the tumor growth will be affected or how effectively they can be killed. However, these existing tumor-on-chip or in vitro tumor models are still very simple. They don’t usually recreate or reproduce the complex structure of the human solid tumors that I described, like where they often include complex vessel networks.

I took the lead to address the need and the challenges of reproducing and then investigating, or probing, the dynamic interactions between those CAR T cells and human solid tumors entirely in vitro.

Q: How does the vascularization work on the chip?

Liu: It took several years to start, from the idea of building this more advanced tumor-on-a-chip technology toward proving it’s actually useful. I started by focusing on this one aspect, which is the CAR T-cell trafficking and their functions after they traffic to fight the tumors, and that will involve the recreation of the structural interface between the tumor and this complex vascular network that’s present in human tumors.

I was inspired by in vivo tumor transplantation, where traditionally, people take human tumors and then transplant them in a bulk, intact format into animal models. So my idea was, if we want to focus more on the human biology, if we want to engineer this entirely in vitro, how about we design a vascular bedding, like a miniature living model?

We basically took advantage of the self-assembly capability of human-sourced endothelial cells, combined with certain stromal fibroblasts, or stromal cells. With a bit of optimization, engineering, tweaking, then we can allow them to form capillary-like vascular networks in our engineered models.

Q: What are the advantages of recreating the tumor microenvironment in this way? That is, is the Petri dish becoming obsolete in cancer research?

Liu: The unique advantage of this way of engineering is to have a higher level of control over the structures of the tissue-tissue interface that we can build. For example, we can engineer different culture chambers. We can engineer different access windows with this model. That allows us to construct, step by step, the vascular bedding and then the tumor transplantation. Also, by forming these perfusable vessels—by the way, we can provide the infusion and flow of the CAR T cells, just like they are infused and flow in the patient—that gives us the leverage to reconstruct, probe, and then control these tissue functions in a highly precise manner.

Q: How did you and your colleagues at Penn explore CAR T-cell activity on the chip?

Liu: We first used different functional assays, like immunostaining and ELISA (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay) assays, to characterize how the CAR T cells are doing and how they are interacting with the tumors in our engineered model. Then we disassembled this engineered tissue to extract all the cells for flow cytometry, to further characterize their functional phenotypes.

With the help of our collaborators and other people in the lab, I took advantage of this engineered model of vascular tumors interacting with CAR T cells for multi-omics analysis. For example, I was able to extract all the cells and send them for single-cell RNA seq[uencing]. We were able to look at the gene expressions of each individual cell from all the cell types that we included in this model. In this way, we have almost like a superpower to probe and read into how each cell—including the CAR Ts and tumors and the vessels—how they are responding and interacting with each other at the molecular gene levels. This is so powerful that it helped me to discover novel interactions between these parties and also new druggable targets.

The message is that through the development of this more advanced tumor-on-a-chip technology—combined with advanced multi-omics analytics and advanced computational analysis—we were able to provide this powerful in vitro technology to apply to accelerate the development of cell therapies, such as the CAR T immunotherapies for cancer, but also other complex diseases.

Q: What are the overall implications of this latest research?

Liu: With a growing understanding of human biology at the cellular and tissue levels, I think we’re seeing that our ability to engineer and design biological systems is also growing. More than ever, we have these advances in the ability to precisely construct, investigate, and then eventually control very complex tissue functions, and even organ functions. For example, our demonstrated tumor-on-a-chip technology is like presenting a miniature sandbox; we can literally see and predict the battlefield of CAR T therapy in cancer.

If we combine these advanced engineering technologies with emerging technologies in spatial multi-omics and the unprecedented productivity of the AI revolution, we will be able to accelerate the understanding of more complex human biology and extract more biological insights, and then apply that to accelerate the development of safer and more efficacious drugs and therapies, such as immunotherapies in cancer.

Q: What are the limitations of organ-on-chip technology that need to be overcome?

Liu: I think there are challenges on two fronts. The first limitation is the lack of complexity. We’re claiming that what we just published is a sufficiently complex system for us to deeply probe and understand the dynamics of CAR T tumor interactions. Still, if we’re speaking next level of translational power or potential, then we need to pursue a higher complexity that incorporates the missing but critical components from in vivo.

The other side of the coin is that if you make this engineered model more complex, you make it more challenging to reproduce or to scale up or to translate to other labs. But also, that points to an opportunity and growing room for translation, to standardize every single step, from the construction to the analysis of these engineered models, and to automate these processes as much as possible.

Q: What do you envision for your new lab?

Liu: I have a lot of things I want to do. I’m eager to establish my own team. The overarching and the unifying theme of the new lab will be to develop the next generation of in vitro complex tissue models, or I call it assembloid tissue models. Assembloid basically means there’s a stem cell-based, three-dimensional complex tissue model that intentionally incorporates different cell types, to emulate the critical tissue-tissue interactions that determine the tissue- and organ-level functions. I still need to make a big decision where the lab could be; it could be in Canada and it could also be in China.

Q: What impact might tumors-on-a-chip have on the future of precision medicine?

Liu: It’s attracting a lot of attention from biologists and clinicians who are heavily focused on using the traditional tissue models—animal models, for example, or the simple dish cultures—for their studies of interest. So the biggest impact I can foresee with our technology is that now it’s more mature. I can see it being gradually, and maybe quickly, adapted into more traditional biological labs, to help them dissect the complex biological questions they’re asking, or to accelerate the evaluation of the exciting new drugs or therapies they’re developing. Overall, I can see that accelerate this development pipeline of new drugs and therapies in precision medicine.

 

Lindsey Leake is an award-winning, independent health reporter based outside Washington, D.C. She spent 15 years as a staff journalist at outlets including Fortune, the USA TODAY Network and Sinclair Broadcast Group. She holds an MA in Science Writing from Johns Hopkins University, an MA in Journalism and Digital Storytelling from American University and a BA from Princeton University.

The post In Conversation with Haijiao Liu, PhD appeared first on Inside Precision Medicine.

<![CDATA[As Canada approaches the planned implementation of their medical euthanasia program for patients with sole psychiatric illnesses, these authors make an argument as to why euthanasia should remain closed to patients with psychiatric disorders.]]>

World Mental Health Day Statement  

Ottawa – October 10, 2025 

As someone who has worked in countries affected by conflict and humanitarian crises, I’ve learned that physical displacement is only part of the story. The mental and emotional toll defines the other half of that experience, and often for much longer. 

This World Mental Health Day focuses on mental health in humanitarian emergencies. It asks us to consider not just the scale of the challenge, but the strength of the response possible when communities lead the way. 

There is no single solution to the mental health impacts of humanitarian crises. But what I’ve witnessed, both internationally and here on Turtle Island, is that the most meaningful support often comes from within affected communities themselves. 

Whether it’s refugees organizing healing circles in displacement camps, neighbours checking in on one another after a wildfire, or volunteers trained to provide peer support—these acts of care are not just helpful. They are essential. They save lives. 

Right now, the world feels heavy. The growing phenomenon of eco-anxiety, combined with escalating crises of famine, war, and displacement, can make hope feel out of reach. We see the numbers—123 million people forcibly displaced worldwide—and it can be overwhelming. 

But I’ve also seen what happens when we share that weight by leaning on one another. This is equally true for humanitarian aid workers, who are responding to unprecedented numbers of conflicts and urgencies at home and around the globe.  

As the World Health Organization reminds us, “Humanitarian workers face extreme stress and are often directly affected by the crisis they respond to.”  

As a member of this community, I know that sustaining an effective humanitarian response means meeting the needs of those providing comfort and care, whether through peer support, workplace health programs, or Mental Health First Aid. Here at home, programs like The Working Mind – First Responder are helping to create a culture of care for those we call on in crisis. 

The way we heal—whether we’re first responders or community workers, volunteers or refugees—is through community. It’s in the everyday ways we show up for one another: listening without judgment, making space for grief and fear, and recognizing that asking for help is an act of courage. 

On this World Mental Health Day, let’s all find the courage to lean on each other. 

Lili-Anna Pereša C.Q.
President & CEO
Mental Health Commission of Canada

The post World Mental Health Day Statement   appeared first on Mental Health Commission of Canada.

Canada Gets its First National Guidance on AI for Mental and Substance Use Health

Ottawa (ONTARIO) – In a first-of-its-kind initiative, national guidance for using artificial intelligence (AI) in the mental and substance use health field is being developed through a partnership between the Canadian Centre on Substance Use and Addiction (CCSA) and the Mental Health Commission of Canada.

AI is increasingly being used for healthcare triage, service navigation, service delivery, and communication, but developers and users have no guidelines specific to mental or substance use health to support its effective and safe use. The recently published E-Mental Health Strategy for Canada highlights the need for safety in this field.

The new National Guidance for Artificial Intelligence Use in Mental Health and Substance Use Health Care will provide guidance, tools, and resources  to help practitioners, organizations, and health leaders in efficiently evaluating and implementing AI-enabled mental health and substance use health care services and solutions. It will also support people with lived or living experience of mental health or substance use health concerns in making informed choices about these technologies, while helping technology companies design and improve such solutions to meet the needs of those who use them.

“People are excited about what AI can bring, but the saying ‘break it then fix it’ can take on new dangers when what is at risk is people’s lives. This guidance will allow innovators to move fast while working to ensure it’s done safely and in a way that increases impact and access,” says CCSA CEO Dr. Alexander Caudarella.

The Mental Health Commission of Canada President and CEO Lili-Anna Pereša adds, “Technology can be a powerful ally in transforming mental health care, but innovation must be matched with responsibility. Communities are the best problem-solvers. By working together with developers, providers, and people with lived experience, we’re creating guidance that ensures AI enhances care safely and meaningfully.”

The National Guidance team will share its early findings at several upcoming conferences, including the World Psychiatric Association’s World Congress of Psychiatry, the Canadian Centre on Substance Use and Addiction’s Issues of Substance conference, and the eMental Health International Collaborative (eMHIC) Congress.

In Canada, mental health and substance use health needs are highly common, yet many people continue to face significant barriers to care, including limited access, stigma, financial costs, and lack of tailored treatment options.

 
The National Guidance for Artificial Intelligence Use with Mental Health and Substance Use Health is expected to launch in 2026/2027.

-30-

About CCSA:

CCSA was created by Parliament to provide national leadership to address substance use in Canada. A trusted counsel, we provide national guidance to decision makers by harnessing the power of research, curating knowledge and bringing together diverse perspectives. CCSA activities and products are made possible through a financial contribution from Health Canada. The views of CCSA do not necessarily represent the views of Health Canada.

About The Mental Health Commission of Canada:

The Commission leads the development and dissemination of innovative programs and tools to support the mental health and wellness of people in Canada. Through its unique mandate from the Government of Canada, the Commission supports federal, provincial, and territorial governments as well as organizations in the implementation of sound public policy. The Commission’s current mandate aims to deliver on priority areas identified in the Mental Health Strategy for Canada in alignment with the delivery of its strategic plan

Media contacts:

Canadian Centre on Substance Use and Addiction
Christine LeBlanc, Senior Strategic Communications Advisor
613-898-6343 | cleblanc@ccsa.ca

Mental Health Commission of Canada
media@mentalhealthcommission.ca

The post Canada Gets its First National Guidance on AI for Mental and Substance Use Health appeared first on Mental Health Commission of Canada.

Beyond Survival: Addressing the Mental Health Crisis Among the World’s Displaced

By Karla Thorpe, Vice President, Programs and Priorities, Mental Health Commission of Canada.

The statistics are staggering, but they represent real human lives: 117 million people worldwide have been forcibly displaced from their homes due to war, famine, and other horrific conditions. To put this in perspective, that’s four times the number displaced during the Second World War. At this year’s International Association for Suicide Prevention conference, experts gathered to address a critical question: How do we support the mental health of those who have lost everything?

The Scale of the Crisis

The numbers tell only part of the story. Two-thirds of asylum seekers find refuge not in wealthy nations like Canada, but in low and middle-income countries that often lack the resources to meet their overwhelming needs. These displaced populations face a perfect storm of challenges: shrinking settlement options, limited support services, and a desperate shortage of culturally appropriate care.

For many refugees, the trauma doesn’t end when they reach safety. Prolonged exposure to violence, separation from loved ones, and the uncertainty of displacement create conditions where suicidal thoughts and behaviours become tragically common. Yet we lack comprehensive data on suicide within displacement camps, partly because refugees often fear that reporting mental health struggles could jeopardize their immigration prospects or those of their families.

Understanding Complex Needs

The mental health challenges facing refugees extend far beyond clinical symptoms. Families torn apart by circumstance may find themselves scattered across different camps or even different countries. The trauma manifests differently across demographics and cultures, requiring nuanced responses rather than one-size-fits-all solutions.

Men often struggle most with feelings of powerlessness, finding healing through employment opportunities that restore their sense of purpose and ability to provide for their families. Women face distinct vulnerabilities, including protection from violence while trying to create stability and hope for their children. Children, who make up approximately 40% of all refugees, grapple with profound losses: family members, security, and often their childhood itself.

It bears repeating what should be obvious but sometimes gets lost in clinical discussions: even the most sophisticated mental health interventions fail without access to basic necessities like food, water, and medicine.

Despite overwhelming challenges, the conference revealed inspiring examples of both systematic programs and grassroots innovations making real differences in refugees’ lives.

Structured Interventions

Throughout the conference, we heard about promising practices being implemented systematically across different countries and innovative, grassroots initiatives being spontaneously enacted to respond to specific local needs. The World Health Organization’s “Problem Management Plus” program trains refugee volunteers to deliver brief cognitive behavioural therapy interventions, creating a sustainable model that builds community capacity while addressing immediate needs.

Similarly, the “Contact and Safety Planning” (CASP) program offers a cost-effective approach: screening to identify those at highest suicide risk, then working directly with these individuals to develop personalized safety plans.

Community-Led Solutions

The most enheartening stories emerged from refugees themselves. Across displacement sites, people are organizing healing and listening circles for those sharing common experiences or challenges. Religious leaders, teachers, and sports coaches are stepping up to support overstretched health professionals. Women are training other women in low-intensity interventions to help those who cannot access care, conducting check-ins via WhatsApp, and providing peer support through text messages.

These organic solutions represent more than resourcefulness; they embody a fundamental truth that conference speakers repeatedly emphasized: refugees are resilient, understand their own needs, and possess valuable insights about healing and recovery.

Redefining Support

A central theme emerged throughout the discussions: supporting refugee mental health requires a power shift from traditional top-down service delivery. Effective interventions must be co-designed with refugee populations, ensuring cultural relevance and community buy-in. Many of the most impactful programs are also surprisingly low-cost, challenging assumptions about resource-intensive treatment models.

But perhaps the most important insight that stuck with me concerns our fundamental approach. After experiencing profound inhumanity throughout their journeys, refugees encounter a critical moment when receiving support: our response can either compound their dehumanization or offer compassion, care, and genuine connection. In a world that has shown them cruelty, our interactions become opportunities to demonstrate that humanity still exists.

Lessons for Canada

How can Canada apply these international insights to strengthen our own refugee support systems?

Stability as Foundation: Following tremendous upheaval and uncertainty, refugees need predictability. Offering permanent status rather than temporary measures provides crucial emotional stability during recovery.

Eliminating Barriers: We must address inequitable access to services, including waiting periods for health coverage that leave vulnerable populations without essential care during critical adjustment periods.

Shifting Public Narrative: Public education campaigns should help Canadians understand the global humanitarian crisis and reframe refugees not as burdens, but as resilient individuals deserving of support and capable of tremendous contributions to our communities.

A Call for Compassion

The refugee mental health crisis demands more than policy responses; it requires a fundamental commitment to recognizing the humanity in every displaced person. As we’ve learned from innovative programs worldwide, the most effective interventions often spring from refugees themselves, given proper support and respect for their expertise about their own experiences.

Globally, we can and must do better. The question isn’t whether we have the resources to support 117 million displaced people; it’s whether we have the collective will to demonstrate that compassion and human dignity remain powerful forces in our world.

 

The post Beyond Survival: Addressing the Mental Health Crisis Among the World’s Displaced appeared first on Mental Health Commission of Canada.