BackgroundNeuropsychiatric conditions are heterogeneous and mechanistically diverse, yet predictive modeling studies commonly aggregate features without evaluating prespecified liability architectures. The Pathogenetic Triad (PT) is a multilevel framework proposing that diagnostic outcomes reflect the joint configuration of a trait-related domain, cognitive capacity (CC), and neuropathological burden (NB). In autism, the trait-related domain corresponds to autistic personality (AP). We evaluated this framework using out-of-sample prediction as a structured empirical test of architectural coherence rather than as a purely data-driven exercise in classification.MethodsWe analyzed a case–comparison cohort (n = 42, 21 autistic) with dense multimodal characterization, including behavioral phenotyping, psychometric measures, autonomic physiology, structural MRI morphometry, and magnetoencephalographic indices. AP was indexed by the Autism-Spectrum Quotient, CC by Wechsler’s scales of intelligence, and NB by heart-rate variability as a proxy indicator. This multimodal structure enabled direct comparison of theory-constrained PT models with strength-matched, domain-restricted atheoretical combinations. Predictive discrimination was evaluated using leakage-free nested cross-validation with permutation inference.ResultsAcross multiverse specifications, low-dimensional PT models ranked among the strongest models of comparable size and achieved discrimination broadly comparable to higher-dimensional models within this dataset. Matched comparisons indicated that including all three PT domains was associated with systematic advantages relative to alternatives with similar univariate input strength, consistent with complementary configurational information relating to case status.ConclusionsThese findings provide preliminary evidence supporting the Pathogenetic Triad as a multilevel architecture of autism liability. Although based on a small and demographically restricted cohort, this densely characterized dataset permitted explicit comparison of theory-guided and atheoretical model spaces. The results illustrate how prespecified multilevel frameworks can be operationalized and empirically evaluated in neuropsychiatric samples.
Radically different