MapLight Therapeutics announced this week that its candidate drug for treatment of schizophrenia had achieved its primary endpoint in a Phase II trial, but only at the twice daily dose tested in the trial.
As reported by the California-based company, while participants of the trial who were given the candidate drug, ML-007C-MA, once a day did show some signs of improvement it was not statistically significant.
ML-007C-MA is a combined muscarinic agonist (betovumeline) and peripherally acting anticholinergic (fesoterodine). It acts by turning on two receptors in the brain, M1 and M4.
M1 is the main receptor the drug is trying to stimulate in the brain cortex and hippocampus, where it is linked to cognition, attention, and possibly some aspects of psychosis. Turning on M4 also helps by acting like a brake on the overactive signaling that contributes to hallucinations and delusions. Betovumeline activates both M1 and M4 centrally, while fesoterodine is there mainly to block unwanted side effects outside the brain, like gastrointestinal issues.
In this study, MapLight randomized 307 adults with an acute exacerbation of schizophrenia to treatment with either a twice daily or once daily treatment with ML-007C-MA or placebo for five weeks.
At five weeks, patients given the twice daily dose had a statistically significant and clinically meaningful reduction in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score of 4.5 points compared to placebo. Cognitive scores were also better in the twice daily group versus placebo.
While this result is positive overall, the non-statistically significant result for the once daily dose proved unpopular with investors and company shares on the Nasdaq fell 40% after the announcement.
In September 2024, Cobenfy, the first muscarinic M1/M4 agonist drug for treatment of schizophrenia was approved by the FDA. Now owned by BMS, Cobenfy will be the main competitor for ML-007C-MA if approved.
Cobenfy was groundbreaking because it was the first new mechanism of action for schizophrenia in decades, moving beyond dopamine blockade to a muscarinic approach and targeting both hallucinations and delusions as well as the more cognitive aspects of the disease, which are not well treated with other drugs.
Despite the approval of Cobenfy, a number of other competitors developing treatments for schizophrenia have failed in recent years. Whether MapLight can succeed at Phase III with ML-007C-MA—which is also being tested as a treatment for psychosis linked to Alzheimer’s disease—and compete with Cobenfy, remains to be seen.
<![CDATA[FDA grants Fast Track to Acadia’s remlifanserin for Alzheimer disease psychosis, targeting hallucinations and delusions as RADIANT trial advances toward 2026 data.]]>
Conditions: Schizoaffective Disorders; Bipolar Disorder With Psychotic Features; Schizophrenia Disorders; Major Depressive Disorder With Psychotic Features; Psychosis NOS
Interventions: Behavioral: Transition Care Team
Sponsors: University of Chicago; Sidney R. Baer, Jr. Foundation
Recruiting
Posted on
<![CDATA[Meta-analysis links traumatic brain injury to rising long-term psychosis risk; severity, age, and follow-up time guide smarter screening and care.]]>
Posted on
<![CDATA[How shifting cannabis laws shape potency, access, and risk—revealing why anxiety, paranoia, and psychosis can surge when users cross regulatory borders.]]>
A consortium led by scientists at the Institute for Bioengineering of Catalonia (IBEC) has developed a series of light-activated small molecule drugs that in preclinicial tests restored sight in blind mice. The team’s approach is based on photopharmacology, a technique for reversibly control drug activity using light.
The newly developed compounds, called prosthe6, mimic the function of light sensing photoreceptor cells, which degenerate in blinding diseases such as age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and retinitis pigmentosa (RP).
The prosthe6 compounds target ON-bipolar neurons and in tests were found to successfully restore saccadic eye movements (optokinetic reflex) in blinded zebrafish larvae, a widely used model for studying visual acuity. Even more strikingly, the researchers demonstrated recovery of innate light-avoidance behavior in mouse models of age-related macular degeneration and retinitis pigmentosa.
Test results suggest that the prosthe6 compounds may be administered by injecting them in the eye, or administered as eye drops. In animal studies the photoswitchable molecules also showed promising preliminary safety profiles, pointing to the development of potential drug candidates for restoring vision in patients with degenerative retinal diseases, without the need for genetic manipulation or implanted devices. Importantly, these compounds are designed to work under normal lighting conditions and do not require light-enhancing devices as optogenetics. They are small, water-soluble molecules that respond to ordinary visible or white light, such as indoor lighting or daylight, without requiring intense or specialized light sources.
“These molecules do not cure blindness, because they do not address the cause of photoreceptor degeneration,” said study co-lead Pau Gorostiza, PhD, ICREA Research Professor at IBEC, leader of the Nanoprobes and Nanoswitches group, member of CIBER-BBN. “But they are remarkably effective at restoring sight, and they do so using a very simple and potentially patient-friendly approach.”
Rosalba Sortino, former PhD student at the University de Barcelona, and currently post-doctoral researcher at Gorostiza’s group at IBEC, added, “Our goal was to restore vision using a molecular mechanism that is as close as possible to how the healthy retina works … Instead of bypassing retinal processing, we aimed to reactivate it right at the same level of the retinal circuit than the lost photoreceptor cells.”
Diseases such as age-related macular degeneration and retinitis pigmentosa affect 200 million people worldwide and are the leading causes of visual impairment and blindness. Beyond the personal impact on quality of life and independence, vision loss places a global economic burden estimated at over US$400 billion per year in healthcare costs and lost productivity.
Researchers Rosalba Sortino (left) and Joaquin Martinez Tambella (right) working in the laboratories of the Institute for Bioengineering of Catalonia (IBEC). Sortino is a post-doctoral researcher at the Nanoprobes and Nanoswitches group at IBEC and co-first author of the study. Martinez is a PhD student at the Nanoprobes and Nanoswitches group at IBEC and co-first author of the study. [Institute for Bioengineering of Catalonia (IBEC)]
In many of these conditions, photoreceptor (PhR) cells—the retina’s light detectors—progressively degenerate and die. Although the downstream retinal neuronal circuitry remains largely intact and functionally viable, it no longer receives the light signals needed to drive visual processing towards the brain. This opportunity has fueled intense research efforts to develop treatments capable of restoring light sensitivity to the eye. Current strategies include gene therapy—effective only for a very small subset of patients with specific mutations—and electronic retinal prostheses, which are invasive, expensive, and require extensive training for effective use.
More recently, optogenetics and light-responsive drugs have entered clinical testing, the latter with encouraging safety results. “Photopharmacology can develop photoswitchable small molecules to restore vision impairment by conferring light sensitivity to ion channels that are widely expressed in the remaining inner retinal neurons, and a first-in-human clinical trial is ongoing,” the team noted. However, achieving high-quality vision at ambient illumination levels remains a major challenge.
The (IBEC)-led consortium has now developed a new class of photoswitchable small-molecule drugs that are capable of restoring key visual functions in animal models of blindness. The team’s photopharmacology-based technique involves modifying a drug’s chemical structure by adding a light-activated molecular switch, enabling control of the pharmacological action using light. “Unlike (opto)genetic manipulation and surgically implanted retinal electronic prostheses, pharmacotherapy is noninvasive, readily reversible, and can be upgraded when new drugs are approved,” the authors noted. “Medicines are preferred by patients, clinicians, and public healthcare systems, they can be developed and manufactured at lower costs than other approaches and assessed by conventional regulatory procedures and clinical assays.”
The reported work builds on more than a decade of research and was carried out in collaboration with the team co-led by Pedro de la Villa at the University of Alcalá (UAH), as well as researchers from the Institut de Química Avançada de Catalunya (IQAC-CSIC), the University of Barcelona (UB), the Institute Ramón y Cajal of Health Research (IRYCIS), the Autonomous University of Barcelona (UAB), and the Fundació Eduard Soler.
Researcher Joaquin Martinez Tambella working in the laboratories of the Institute for Bioengineering of Catalonia (IBEC). Martinez is a PhD student at the Nanoprobes and Nanoswitches group at IBEC and co-first author of the study. [Institute for Bioengineering of Catalonia (IBEC)]
The prosthe6 compounds work by acting on a specific type of retinal cells called ON bipolar cells, which normally receive signals from the photoreceptors. “In healthy vision, ON bipolar cells play a key role in passing on information about the presence of light to the rest of the visual circuit,” explained study co-lead de la Villa. “In degenerative eye diseases, although the photoreceptors are lost, much of this underlying circuitry remains intact but inactive. This creates a major therapeutic opportunity.”
By targeting a protein (mGlu6) in this preserved part of the retina, prosthe6 compounds can take over the role of the missing photoreceptors. “… we have targeted metabotropic glutamate 6 (mGlu6) receptors, which are exclusively expressed in ON bipolar cells (OBCs) and localized postsynaptic to PhR cells, thereby leveraging a privileged position to drive physiological visual circuit,” the investigators explained. When light enters the eye, the molecules respond by changing their shape, triggering signals inside the retina in a way that closely resembles natural vision. In this way, the drugs effectively act as “molecular prostheses,” helping the eye process light again without the need for implants or genetic modifications.
Healthy mice naturally prefer to remain in dark environments and instinctively avoid brightly lit areas, a behavior that relies entirely on a functional visual system. Blind mice, by contrast, lose this preference and move indistinctly between light and dark spaces, as they are unable to perceive light. The team showed that after treatment with prosthe6, blind mice once again showed a clear and spontaneous preference for dark areas, indicating that they could perceive light and use this information to guide their behavior.
This recovery occurred without any training and under light levels comparable to those found indoors or on an overcast day, demonstrating that the treatment restores functional light perception capable of driving natural, visually guided behavior.
Two lead compounds, prosthe6-12 and prosthe6-15, showed particularly promising results. The restored behaviors were observed not only after intraocular injection, but also after topical administration as eye drops. “… at least two compounds (prosthe6-12 and -15) appear to be devoid of adverse effects and restore sight by topical administration, which is linked to higher overall clinical success rate than systemic routes for neurological drugs, and to stronger patient adherence,” the investigators pointed out.
The prosthe6 technology is protected by patent and the researchers are now evaluating its safety and formulation to extend the duration of visual rehabilitation. The team is working with Eyelumina, a spin-off company in formation to secure investments that support translational development and future clinical trials.
“Turning this into a therapy is a long and laborious process,” says Gorostiza. “But the results show that there is a realistic possibility of restoring high-quality vision with drugs, non-invasively, reversibly and with a mechanism that is independent of the specific retinal disorder or genetic mutation to reach a majority of patients.”
If successful in humans, the drug-based approach would offer a widely accessible and affordable alternative to existing vision restoration technologies, especially relevant for patients with advanced retinal degeneration for whom no effective treatments currently exist.
In their paper the team further stated, “From a fundamental perspective, prosthe6 constitute new tools for ophthalmology to study the physiopathology of mGlu6 receptors and retinal circuits in vitro and in vivo and contribute to the medicinal chemistry of allosteric modulators. They also achieve the prediction that upstream targeted photopharmacology can deliver nearly native output signals, taking full advantage of the retinal circuit for high-quality vision restoration.”
Categorical nosological systems frequently fall short when confronted with patients whose presentations cross established diagnostic boundaries. We report M.S., a 44-year-old Brazilian man involuntarily admitted to a psychiatric inpatient unit who presented with systematized persecutory ideation of mechanistic–technological content (chip implantation, satellite-based surveillance), structural ego fragility, absent insight, and progressive social and occupational deterioration. While prior diagnoses of bipolar disorder and provisional schizophrenia had been considered, neither fully captured the clinical complexity. Psychopathological-dimensional analysis, grounded in phenomenological observation and contemporary psychopathological theory, suggests three potentially interacting axes: (1) structural ego fragility (Ich-Schwäche), potentially arising from impaired early attachment and deficient relational learning; (2) a relational causality deficit replaced by concrete–mechanistic reasoning; and (3) limbic hyperactivation that appears to sustain an anxiety–perplexity–paranoia feedback loop. These converge on a schizotypal–affective spectrum formulation. Laboratory investigations identified severe dyslipidemia and marked hyperandrogenism (total testosterone 1,367 ng/dL), the latter potentially associated with limbic hyperactivation, though causality cannot be established from a single cross-sectional measurement. Psychometric assessment (BPRS-18) at admission yielded a total score of 43, with suspiciousness (5) and unusual thought content (5) as dominant items. During a seven-day inpatient course, a multimodal thymic strategy—risperidone, lithium carbonate, and structured psychotherapy—produced attenuation of paranoid reactivity, improved family engagement, and the spontaneous resumption of guitar playing from day 3, as a functional correlate of behavioral stabilization. The patient was discharged with a referral for a three-monthly paliperidone palmitate long-acting injectable. The pharmacological response retrospectively supports the dimensional formulation and illustrates the heuristic value of psychopathological analysis grounded in ego structure, causal reasoning, and affective dysregulation as a complementary approach to categorical nosology in complex psychotic–affective presentations.
Posted on
<![CDATA[Clinicians track relapse risk in schizophrenia by spotting functional decline, paranoia, missed care, and triggers, using family check-ins, brief scales, and labs.]]>
BackgroundSubstance use disorders (SUDs) and treatment-resistant depression (TRD) remain a major global health challenge, marked by high relapse rates and limited long-term effectiveness of existing treatments. Ketamine, a glutamatergic modulator with rapid neuroplastic effects, has emerged as a novel intervention for TRD and is increasingly investigated as an adjunctive treatment for addiction, yet concerns about its abuse liability persist.ObjectiveThis review critically evaluates ketamine’s therapeutic potential for SUDs while examining its neurobiological mechanisms, clinical efficacy, and risk of misuse within a unified risk–benefit framework.MethodsA structured narrative review conducted in accordance with the SANRA framework using the PubMed, Scopus, PsycINFO, and Web of Science databases, covering literature published until March 2026. Eligible studies included clinical trials, experimental studies, and mechanistic investigations relevant to ketamine use in addiction and depression. Evidence was synthesized thematically across the domains of efficacy, mechanisms, and safety.ResultsAcross alcohol and cocaine use disorders, ketamine combined with psychotherapy has demonstrated promising reductions in craving and increases in abstinent days in small-to moderate-sized Phase 2 trials. However, findings remain difficult to generalize due to considerable variability in dosing strategies, comparator conditions, and follow-up periods. Effects on relapse prevention have been more inconsistent and less reliably positive. Mechanistically, ketamine promotes synaptic plasticity via NMDA receptor antagonism and downstream glutamatergic signaling, potentially disrupting maladaptive reward-related memories and reversing maladaptive neurocircuitry involved in both depression and addiction. While acute adverse effects are generally transient under clinical supervision, ketamine carries a well-established risk of misuse, particularly in unsupervised or high-dose settings.ConclusionsKetamine represents a promising but still experimental intervention for both refractory depression and selected SUDs. Its clinical use depends on careful patient selection, structured delivery, and integration with psychotherapy. Although ketamine may redefine treatment paradigms for TRD and addiction, larger-scale trials and long-term safety data are essential to define its role within psychiatric and addiction treatment frameworks.
IntroductionIntravenous (IV) ketamine and intranasal esketamine are NMDA receptor antagonists used for treatment-resistant depression (TRD). Both have demonstrated efficacy in controlled trials, but observational evidence from real-world community settings is limited.MethodsWe conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study of adults aged 18 to 65 receiving induction therapy for TRD with intranasal esketamine or IV ketamine at a community psychiatric clinic from January 1 through December 31, 2025. Patients with prior exposure to either medication or to oral ketamine derivatives were excluded. The primary outcome was change in Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) score from baseline to end of induction. Secondary outcomes included response (≥50% PHQ-9 reduction), remission (final PHQ-9 ≤4), clinically meaningful improvement (≥5 PHQ-9 reduction), induction completion, and adverse events. Within-group and per-protocol analyses were exploratory.ResultsSixty-three patients met inclusion criteria (esketamine n=37; IV ketamine n=26). Baseline PHQ-9 scores were similar (18.22±4.49 vs. 18.27±5.41; P = 0.967), as was mean change from baseline (-10.31±5.59 vs. -9.50±5.69; mean difference 0.81, 95% CI -2.12 to 3.75; P = 0.589). Response rates were 64.9% vs. 69.2% (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.66 to 1.33; P = 0.790), remission 32.4% vs. 23.1% (RR 1.41, 95% CI 0.61 to 3.26; P = 0.573), and clinically meaningful improvement 83.8% vs 73.1% (RR 1.15, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.51; P = 0.353). Induction completion exceeded 90% in both groups; one patient per cohort discontinued from intolerable side effects, and no serious adverse events occurred. Within-group PHQ-9 reduction was large: 10.31±5.59 points (paired t[34]=10.91; P<0.001; Cohen’s d=1.84) for esketamine and 9.50±5.69 points (paired t[23]=8.18; P<0.001; Cohen’s d=1.67) for ketamine. Findings remained statistically significant and clinically large under a pre-specified baseline observation carried forward (BOCF) sensitivity analysis (Cohen’s d=1.65 and 1.45).ConclusionsInduction therapy with intranasal esketamine and intravenous ketamine was associated with robust antidepressant effects in a community outpatient setting, consistent with prior trial data. The modest sample size limits power to detect between-group differences and increases the risk of type II error; the absence of statistically significant between-group differences should therefore not be interpreted as evidence of equivalence. Protocol asymmetry between arms (esketamine: 12 sessions over 8 weeks; IV ketamine: 6 sessions over 3 weeks) further limits direct comparison of endpoint values between groups. Practical considerations including insurance coverage, cost, and administration logistics may help guide treatment selection. Longitudinal follow-up is planned to characterize treatment durability.