Pascoli et al. show that nucleus accumbens dopamine transients evoked by reward-predictive cues encode subjective reward value in mice, predicting individual preference for drugs over natural rewards and forecasting vulnerability to compulsive drug-seeking behavior.
BackgroundSleep disorders not only impair nocturnal rest but also significantly compromise daytime functioning, emotional regulation, and overall mental well-being. Beyond conventional pharmacological treatments, manual therapy has emerged as a promising non-pharmacological intervention. Specifically, emerging evidence suggests its benefits may extend to alleviating psychological distress and enhancing mood. This study employs a bibliometric approach to systematically investigate the current status, research hotspots, and future trends of manual therapy for sleep disorders, with an emphasis on its psycho-physiological outcomes.MethodsPublications related to manual therapy for sleep disorders were retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC). Bibliometric visualizations and analyses were conducted using VOSviewer and CiteSpace. Furthermore, clinical trial records from PubMed were extracted to assess the translational and clinical advancements in this field.ResultsThe analysis included 594 publications originating from 321 institutions across 63 countries. The overall trend demonstrates a consistent annual increase in both publication volume and citation impact, reflecting escalating academic interest. Keyword and literature co-occurrence analyses indicate that exploring neurobiological mechanisms and circadian rhythm regulation are the predominant research frontiers.ConclusionBibliometric evidence indicates that research on manual therapy for sleep disorders is evolving toward multidimensional and interdisciplinary integration. Manual therapy increasingly emerges as a key complementary treatment, exerting therapeutic effects via the regulation of 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) and the Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Adrenal axis (HPA axis). Its safety and efficacy represent distinct advantages; however, future clinical translation necessitates multi-center validation and standardized sham-controlled protocols.
Background: Functional impairments associated with mental health conditions are on the rise. Predicting functional outcomes may improve the targeting of preventive interventions. While prognostic models have primarily focused on psychosis, early recognition services require a transdiagnostic approach. Objective: This study aimed to predict global functioning within a 2-year follow-up using baseline clinical and structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data in a population-based sample of young, help-seeking individuals presenting with affective and anxiety symptoms as well as attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Methods: We classified 357 help-seeking individuals aged 18‐35 years recruited from 9 sites as “impaired” (Global Assessment of Functioning [GAF] ≤60; n=228) or “nonimpaired” (GAF>60; n=129) at year 1 and/or year 2 follow-up. GAF classification group status at follow-up was predicted using linear support vector machine (SVM), decision tree, and large language model (LLM) Llama-3 using clinical assessments and/or structural MRI. Leave-one-site-out (SVM) or external sample (LLM) was used for validation. Results: SVM achieved balanced accuracy of 69.2% using clinical features only. Items related to baseline occupational functioning, interpersonal relationships, cognitive functioning, psychotic and affective symptoms, as well as the presence of anxiety disorder, were most predictive. The decision tree further reduced the feature set to 5 predictive items, achieving balanced accuracy of 76.6%. Although amygdala and hippocampal subregions achieved balanced accuracy of 57.1%, structural MRI did not improve the overall prediction. Llama-3 performed comparably well to SVM (balanced accuracy of 72.6%). Conclusions: Machine learning demonstrated good performance in predicting global functioning. Interestingly, the out-of-the-box LLM performed comparably well without being trained or fine-tuned, highlighting the potential of leveraging free-text data for mental health prognosis.
Background: Digital meditation-based interventions (MBIs) reach vast global audiences with millions of active users, yet concerns persist about the frequency and nature of adverse experiences (ie, AExs) occurring during meditation training. Some researchers have argued that AExs are substantially underdetected and reflect iatrogenic harm caused by meditation (ie, adverse effects [AEfs]). Others contend that these experiences largely reflect common stressors that would be experienced without meditation. These competing perspectives underscore the need for further research, particularly in the context of digital MBIs, the most widely used form of meditation training. Objective: This study examined the prevalence, predictors, and subjective evaluations of AExs during a digital MBI and tested whether reported experiences may be caused by meditation practice via comparisons between meditation-exposed and nonexposed participants. Methods: Data were drawn from 2 trials of the Healthy Minds Program. Exploratory study 1 (n=315) consisted of a sample of distressed US undergraduate students to estimate the prevalence of AExs and identify baseline predictors. Preregistered confirmatory study 2 (n=594) sampled distressed US adults from all 50 states to replicate findings from study 1 and to examine participants’ subjective evaluations of AExs. Study 2 additionally compared AEx rates between participants who did and did not complete guided meditations to assess whether AExs could be caused by meditation exposure. Study 3 (n=87) used qualitative methods to analyze study 1 participants’ responses to an open-ended question regarding their strategies for coping with AExs. Results: In studies 1 and 2, 27.9% (88/315) and 10.1% (40/396) of participants, respectively, reported at least one AEx during the study period, with 6.7% (21/315) and 3% (12/396) reporting functional impairment, largely aligning with previous research. Critically, in study 2, rates of AExs did not significantly differ between participants who did and did not complete guided meditations, suggesting that these experiences were not caused by meditation practice. Higher baseline depression, anxiety, loneliness, experiential avoidance, and perceived barriers to meditation predicted more frequent AExs. In studies 1 and 2, 89.8% (79/88) and 90% (36/40) of participants who reported AExs, respectively, indicated that they were glad to have learned to meditate. Qualitative analyses showed that participants used diverse coping strategies, often using skills learned through the Healthy Minds Program. Conclusions: AExs were relatively common but occurred at comparable rates among participants who did and did not meditate, challenging claims that such experiences were caused by meditation practice in distressed individuals. Although a small subset of participants reported some degree of functional impairment, most evaluated their AExs as tolerable and described their overall MBI experience as positive. Together, these findings highlight the importance of distinguishing AExs that likely reflect epiphenomena of preexisting distress or symptoms from iatrogenic harm attributable to MBIs. Trial Registration: Study 1: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04741529; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04741529; Study 2: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06282523; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06282523
<img src="https://jmir-production.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/thumbs/09106e6bad7f3f15798304e0c00626ec" />
A next-generation device that detects signs of stress could have wide-ranging applications, from investigating sleep disorders to detecting signs of sepsis.
The polygraph detector, described in Science Advances, is worn on the chest and can even sense when a person is lying.
It allows psychophysiological states to be continuously monitored through a combination of multimodal sensing and wireless data transmission.
The gadget offers an alternative to current approaches such as such as polygraphy and polysomnography (PSG), which involve cumbersome wired sensors that limit their practicality.
“By uncovering mechanistic links between autonomic imbalance, stress reactivity, and health outcomes, these devices have the potential to transform diagnostic workflows, optimize educational programs, and enable personalized therapeutic monitoring across stress medicine, pediatrics, and behavioral health,” reported Sun Hong Kim, PhD, from the University of Seoul in South Korea, and co-workers.
Subtle physiological variations in cardiac, respiratory, electrodermal, and thermal activity often serve as indicators of compromised health or heightened stress responses.
These can be reflected in many scenarios, from pediatric sleep disorders that disrupt neurodevelopment to the psychological strain experienced in high-stakes clinical settings or during polygraph examinations.
Accurate monitoring of psychophysiological states is therefore essential for understanding how stress and autonomic dysfunction manifest across a wide spectrum of medical conditions.
However, most existing devices monitor only one or two parameters or rely on electrochemical sensors that detect sweat biomarkers, thereby failing to reflect the complex and dynamic interplay between multiple physiological systems.
Wearable polygraph device in the palm of a hand for scale. [John A. Rogers/Northwestern University]
Kim and co-workers therefore designed a single platform to enable comprehensive assessment of autonomic and stress-related physiology in real time.
The device continuously measures changes in heartbeat, skin temperature, and breathing, which are then converted using machine learning into measures of psychological strain.
The device had high fidelity with gold standard systems in quantifying the complex psychological stress induced by polygraph interviews and complex cognitive load tasks as well as the physical stress caused by repeatedly putting a hand in an iced water.
During overnight monitoring of children, it reliably identified arousals, hypopnea, and apnea while revealing disease-specific autonomic signatures among infants with Down syndrome.
Real-world deployment during emergency simulation training showed that multimodal stress signatures correlate inversely with performance, reflecting its value for medical education.
Machine learning analyses across all studies confirmed that multimodal features outperformed single-signal approaches in detecting stress and clinical events with high sensitivity and specificity.
“A particularly notable contribution lies in pediatric sleep medicine,” the authors noted.
“Simultaneous comparison with PSG confirms the ability to detect arousals, hypopnea, and apnea while also providing mechanistic insights into autonomic regulation.
“In infants with Down syndrome, multimodal analysis reveals attenuated sympathetic responsiveness and parasympathetic dominance, consistent with known vulnerabilities in airway patency and autonomic control.
“Such disease-specific autonomic signatures may serve as valuable biomarkers for risk stratification, early diagnosis, and targeted intervention in neurodevelopmental disorders.”
BackgroundInternet Gaming Disorder (IGD) represents a significant behavioral health concern, yet the roles of internalizing and externalizing psychological vulnerabilities in its development remain underexplored, particularly in Arabic-speaking populations.ObjectiveThis study examined anger and social anxiety as distinct externalizing and internalizing predictors of IGD severity in a Saudi Arabian community sample.MethodsA cross-sectional survey was administered to 303 participants (60.1% female; estimated mean age = 29.79 years, SD = 8.83) across five regions of Saudi Arabia. Participants completed the Internet Gaming Disorder Scale–Short Form (IGDS9-SF), a three-item Anger Screening Scale, and a two-item Social Anxiety screener. Hierarchical linear regression and structural equation modeling (SEM) were conducted to examine unique and incremental contributions of anger and social anxiety to IGD symptoms.ResultsAnger and social anxiety were strongly intercorrelated (r = .86, p <.001) but demonstrated divergent patterns in multivariate models. Hierarchical regression indicated that both predictors contributed unique variance when entered simultaneously, with anger positively and social anxiety negatively predicting IGD after controlling for shared variance. However, SEM clarified that only social anxiety significantly predicted latent IGD severity (β = .32, p = .027), whereas anger did not (β = .07, p = .68). The final model explained approximately 13% of variance in IGD symptoms.ConclusionsSocial anxiety was associated with IGD severity as a distinct internalizing correlate, consistent with avoidance-based coping and online social preference accounts. These preliminary, cross-sectional findings suggest that social anxiety warrants consideration in future IGD screening and research efforts in Arabic-speaking contexts.
Interest in glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1s) continues to surge due to their effectiveness in reducing body weight and improving metabolic outcomes. This includes interest in small molecule oral GLP-1s which are more bioavailable and more easily manufactured than their injectable counterparts.
Now data from a new study in mice performed by scientists at the University of Virginia shows that this emerging class of weight-loss drugs suppress hedonic eating by modulating a reward circuit deep in the brain that is separate from previously described mechanisms that broadly affect appetite. The scientists believe that this pathway could be an avenue by which GLP-1s treat other dysfunctions in reward processing such as substance use disorders.
Details of the National Institutes of Health-funded study were published this week in a Nature paper titled “A brain reward circuit inhibited by next-generation weight-loss drugs in mice.” In it, the team reported that they investigated the small-molecule GLP-1s including Eli Lilly’s recently approved drug orforglipron, also known by the brand name Foundayo, as well as danuglipron, an oral GLP-1 that was being developed by Pfizer until the company decided to discontinue its development in 2025.
Previous studies that explored the effects of larger peptide GLP-1s such as semaglutide in the brain have found that they suppress hunger-driven eating by engaging networks in the hypothalamus and hindbrain. What has been less clear is the mechanism by which small-molecule GLP-1s work. “As the accessibility of these medications continues to rise and patient uptake increases, it’s crucial that we understand the neural mechanisms underlying the effects we’re seeing,” said Lorenzo Leggio, MD, PhD, clinical director of NIH’s National Institute on Drug Abuse.
The current study gets scientists one step closer to that goal. According to the paper, the scientists first used gene editing to modify the GLP-1 receptors of mice to make them more humanlike. They then administered orforglipron or danuglipron to the mice, and identified brain regions where the drugs induced activity. The results showed that in addition to inducing activity in familiar pathways, the drugs also triggered the central amygdala, a region associated with desire that is deeper in the brain than scientists previously thought GLP-1s could directly reach. Further testing showed that once activated, the central amygdala reduced the release of dopamine into key hubs of the brain’s reward circuitry during hedonic feeding.
“We’ve known that GLP-1 drugs suppress feeding behavior driven by energy demand,” said co-corresponding author Ali Guler, PhD, a professor of biology at the University of Virginia. “Now it seems oral small-molecule GLP-1s also dial back eating for pleasure by engaging a brain reward circuit.”
Given the effect of these drugs on eating for pleasure, future studies could explore whether small-molecule GLP-1s can also suppress cravings for other addictive substances. It is a question that the team hopes to explore in follow up studies focused specifically on substance use disorder.
Enhanced signaling of dopamine and/or serotonin during highly arousing situations can be reduced in part by monoamine transporters, such as plasma membrane monoamine transporter (PMAT, Slc29a4). An absence of selective pharmacological inhibitors means genetically modified mice constitutively deficient in PMAT remain the best tool for studying PMAT’s organism-level functional effects. Fear conditioning is a high arousal process. Generalization of fear is evolutionarily advantageous, whereby information learned from one experience is applied to other new but similar encounters. Pathological fear generalization, in contrast, is a core feature of most anxiety disorders. Given our previous findings indicating PMAT function reduces male mice’s context fear and enhances extinction of female mice’s cued fear, we hypothesized PMAT would similarly reduce generalization (i.e., enhance discrimination) of context and cued fear in male and female mice, respectively. Our context and cued fear conditioning experiments in adult PMAT wildtype (+/+) and heterozygous (+/−) male and female mice partially supported our hypotheses. We discovered PMAT facilitates extinction of contextually generalized fear, plus subsequent extinction of context-specific fear, selectively in females. Moreover, when specific fear cues or contexts were temporally presented before cues or contexts that were similar enough to make generalization possible, PMAT enhanced biological sex differences. Growing evidence reports common PMAT polymorphisms elicit measurable effects when PMAT function is reduced. Thus, we suspect future experiments may reveal positive associations between PMAT polymorphisms and risk for anxiety disorder symptoms, particularly in people assigned female at birth. Inclusion of these genetic variations in pharmacogenomic analyses may prove therapeutically beneficial.
Posted on
<![CDATA[Explore how neuromelanin-sensitive MRI noninvasively tracks long-term dopamine and noradrenaline system changes.]]>