<![CDATA[New phase 3 analyses show centanafadine improves adult ADHD executive function and emotional regulation beyond core symptoms, as FDA review advances toward July 2026.]]>
Rhythm-Based Video Games: Exploring the Cognitive and Learning Potential
By Florencia Assaneo, PhD, Research Fellow, Stavros Niarchos Foundation (SNF) Global Center for Child and Adolescent Mental Health at the Child Mind Institute
Educational challenges for Latin American children
Primary education in Latin America has faced a steady decline over recent decades, contributing to what many organizations now describe as an educational crisis. International institutions such as the Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), as well as the World Bank Group have all called for urgent action to address worsening learning outcomes across the region. The situation is particularly concerning in Mexico. Results from the 2022 Programme for International Student Assessment showed that Mexico scored well below the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) average in reading, mathematics, and science — placing the country among the lower-performing educational systems evaluated globally.
The consequences of this crisis extend far beyond the classroom. Educational difficulties during childhood are closely linked to long-term social and mental health outcomes. Research has shown that additional years of basic education are associated with lower rates of depression and anxiety (Kondirolli & Sunder, 2022), as well as higher levels of resilience and perceived control over one’s life (Niemeyer et al. 2019). In this sense, poor academic performance in primary school can have lasting effects that continue into adulthood, limiting employment opportunities, increasing vulnerability, and negatively affecting overall well-being.
Can rhythm-based video games improve learning?
Open-access interventions that strengthen children’s cognitive and academic abilities could have enormous value in low- and middle-income countries, where educational resources are often limited. Our work explores whether the ability to coordinate movements with rhythmic sounds — such as clapping, tapping, or dancing to music — can be leveraged to support children’s learning and cognitive development through engaging digital tools.
Over the last decade, multiple studies have shown that children who are better at synchronizing their movements to rhythm also tend to perform better on a wide range of cognitive and language-related tasks. These include reading, phonological awareness, processing speed, rapid naming, and other foundational abilities linked to academic success. Researchers have assessed these rhythmic coordination skills in multiple ways, from walking to the beat of music to tapping along with a steady rhythm or coordinating movements while playing musical instruments. Across these different approaches, one result consistently emerges: children who are better at aligning movement with sound also tend to show stronger cognitive performance.
Building on these study findings, my current fellowship project, supported by the Stavros Niarchos Foundation (SNF) Global Center for Child and Adolescent Mental Health at the Child Mind Institute, seeks to better understand how these rhythm synchronization abilities develop during childhood and whether they could eventually be strengthened through interactive digital interventions. Specifically, we are studying the developmental stage at which these abilities become established in children, and whether individuals with stronger rhythmic coordination also show advantages in attention and language-related skills. Understanding when these abilities emerge is particularly important because it may help identify the developmental window during which they are most malleable and therefore most responsive to training or intervention.
In parallel, we are using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) — a non-invasive brain imaging technique that allows us to observe which brain regions become active during different tasks — to explore the relationship between rhythmic synchronization and the brain’s reward system. Importantly, these same reward-related regions are also strongly engaged during video game play. If the pathways within this reward system are similarly activated during rhythmic coordination, this could mean that children who initially struggle to synchronize movements with sound may be able to strengthen these abilities through a carefully designed video game experience. One possible future application could involve an open-access mobile game in which children synchronize taps or hand movements to musical rhythms while progressing through increasingly challenging levels and unlocking rewards or visual customizations.
Overall, the current project seeks to generate the scientific evidence necessary to determine whether rhythm-based digital interventions could become a viable tool for supporting children’s cognitive development. This work has the potential to contribute to the future development of accessible and scalable tools that can strengthen foundational cognitive skills linked to academic performance in children. These tools can be applied to children in Mexico and, more broadly, across low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), expanding access to education resources and interventions.
The power of collaboration between the SNF Global Center and UNAM
Our laboratory at Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM) is primarily dedicated to basic neuroscience research. Based at UNAM’s campus in Querétaro, our team brings together researchers and students from different disciplines — including neuroscience, psychology, physics, engineering, and data analysis — united by a shared interest in understanding how rhythm and brain dynamics shape human cognition and behavior. Here, we have access to excellent infrastructure for fundamental research, including neuroimaging facilities and high-performance computational resources. However, translating basic scientific discoveries into interventions capable of improving people’s daily lives is often much more challenging and requires strong cross-sector collaboration.
The work I’m conducting as part of the SNF Global Center Research Fellowship has encouraged us to begin thinking beyond the laboratory. This current fellowship has given us the opportunity to test the core scientific assumptions behind our proposed open-access intervention. If the pilot project proves successful, the next stages of the work will become considerably more ambitious, involving both the technological development of the intervention and its large-scale implementation and evaluation in school settings. Advancing toward those goals will likely require the support of larger international organizations and cross-sector collaborations. In this context, the opportunities provided by the SNF Global Center at the Child Mind Institute to share, disseminate, and give visibility to our work are extremely valuable, helping create the connections and momentum necessary to move from foundational research toward real-world impact.
More broadly, this kind of collaboration highlights the importance of building bridges between global institutions and local research communities. By combining international support with local expertise and close engagement with schools and communities, it becomes possible to develop solutions that are both scientifically rigorous and genuinely connected to the realities of the populations they aim to serve.
Learn more about the Research Fellowship
The post Rhythm-Based Video Games: Exploring the Cognitive and Learning Potential appeared first on Child Mind Institute.
DyAMNet: dynamic adversarial and contrastive network for EEG biometrics
IntroductionElectroencephalogram (EEG)-based biometric recognition for brain–computer interfaces faces challenges from domain shifts, temporal nonstationarity, and limited scalability.MethodsTo address these issues, we present DyAMNet, a framework that combines EEG microstate analysis with a hybrid attention mechanism. DyAMNet employs dynamic loss balancing to improve generalization and constructs a domain-invariant feature space that supports user expansion without catastrophic forgetting. We evaluated the model on three benchmark datasets (DEAP, THU-EP, and SEED).ResultsThe framework attains 87.2% accuracy in cross-dataset recognition and retains 84.0% accuracy when incrementally scaling to 60 users. The system also tolerates physiological artifacts and intersession signal drift, outperforming state-of-the-art models.DiscussionThese findings show that dynamic adversarial training coupled with contrastive feature learning reduces brain-signal variability and preserves scalability. The work establishes a robust basis for feasible identity authentication and supports deploying brain–computer interfaces in clinical and everyday settings. The code is available at: https://github.com/cangtianhaoxue/DyAMNet.git.
Suicide and suicidal behavior in the gulf cooperation council countries: a Systematic Review of behavioral patterns, sociocultural determinants, and structural vulnerabilities
Suicide and suicidal behavior in the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries remain underrepresented in empirical research, largely due to cultural stigma, legal prohibitions, and systematic underreporting. The behavioral and sociocultural determinants of suicidal behavior in these contexts—where rapid modernization intersects with Islamic normative frameworks and large-scale labor migration—have received particularly limited systematic attention. This review synthesizes available evidence on the prevalence, behavioral patterns, risk factors, and structural determinants of suicidal behavior across Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates. Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, we searched PubMed, Scopus, ScienceDirect, Web of Science, and Google Scholar for primary research published between 2000 and 2025. Fifty studies (34 GCC-specific and 16 contextual/comparative) met the inclusion criteria. Methodological quality was appraised using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale, JBI checklists, the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool, and the AACODS checklist. The review protocol was registered on the Open Science Framework (DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/RZXY7; URL: https://osf.io/rzxy7/). The findings were organized into six dimensions: (1) suicide prevalence, risk factors, and associated behaviors; (2) cultural and religious influences; (3) mental health of specific at-risk populations; (4) healthcare and support services; (5) migrant worker vulnerabilities; and (6) research trends. Reported suicide rates in the GCC range from 1.5 to 4.2 per 100,000 but likely underestimate the true prevalence due to forensic misclassification and stigma. Migrant workers constitute a high-risk subgroup, with suicidal ideation reaching 68% among those facing acute financial distress. Islamic religiosity is associated with lower suicide mortality but simultaneously deters help-seeking by stigmatizing mental distress. Interpreted through a Durkheimian lens, these findings position suicidal behavior in the GCC as a social fact shaped by weakened social integration and normative fragmentation under rapid modernization. Effective prevention requires culturally adapted behavioral interventions that integrate labor welfare reforms with community-based mental health strategies.
Heat waves mess with your brain. Scientists are trying to figure out why.
It’s been hot in London this week. Really hot. A dangerous heat wave has hit Western Europe. Yesterday, the UK recorded its highest ever June temperature at 36.1 °C (about 97 °F). But as the weather app on my phone confirmed, it felt like 39 °C.
It’s frightening that we are seeing such temperatures in the UK in June. According to the Met Office, the country’s national weather and climate service, June temperatures peaked at an average 19 °C (66 °F) in England between 1991 and 2020. Across Europe, the heat wave is likely to cause thousands of deaths. There will be other awful consequences for agriculture, infrastructure, and the health system.
But this week I want to look at what the heat does to our minds and brains. Personally, I’ve found it almost impossible to think straight. The heat is distracting and my mind is foggy. I dread to think about the conditions of people who work outdoors, in even hotter regions.
It’s not just exhaustion and confusion. The effects of heat on the brain can be deadly. And researchers are still trying to figure out why.
Studies have confirmed that as temperatures rise, people seem to get more irritable and more violent. Most of these studies are based on associations, though. It’s difficult to directly study how a heat wave might affect our thinking, says Catherine Thompson, a cognitive psychologist at Liverpool Hope University.
She has been studying the effects of extreme heat on firefighters instead. It’s easier to measure people’s cognitive skills before and after they undergo scheduled training that involves entering a burning building.
It’s early days, but the team found that firefighters found it harder to focus and control their attention immediately after heat exposure—something people in heat waves can empathize with, I’m sure.
The firefighters’ skills returned to normal after 20 minutes or so of cooling down. But they’d experienced just 15 minutes of intense heat exposure. Thompson doesn’t know what the effects of living through a days-long heat wave might be—or how long they’ll last. Figuring that out might involve shipping cognitive test kits to thousands of people during the few days’ notice of an impending heat wave. “My guess [is] that no one’s done it because it’s just so difficult to do,” says Thompson.
Still, researchers can learn about some of the impacts of heat waves through studies after the fact. And those studies suggest that the heat seems to have more disastrous outcomes for people with mental-health disorders.
Those outcomes become apparent when temperatures rise above what is considered typical for a given region. “There seems to be a correlation where the hotter it gets, especially during the hottest times of the year, the worse the mental-health outcomes,” says Joshua Wortzel, who directs the Heat-Mind Lab at Hartford HealthCare in Connecticut.
In a study published in 2023, Emma Lawrence at the University of Oxford, who studies the effect of climate change on mental health, and her colleagues reviewed the evidence linking mental-health outcomes to ambient outdoor temperatures. They found that during heat waves, there was a 9.7% increase in the rate of hospital admissions for people with such conditions.
“People who live with mental-health conditions are among the most susceptible to the physical impacts of heat,” says Lawrence. People with schizophrenia were found to have been three times more likely to die during the record-breaking heat wave that affected Canada in 2021, for example.
In order to protect people, we need a better understanding of the mechanisms underlying these effects. After all, a lot of things change when it’s very, very hot. Some people may end up stuck indoors, avoiding outdoor play and exercise, and it can be difficult to get a good night of sleep, for example. Sleep, socializing, and exercise are all really important for our mental health.
But whether unusual heat does something specific to our brains is, as Wortzel puts it, “the million-dollar question.”
Research in lab animals suggests that excessive heat can alter the way chemical signals work in our brain. The levels of neurotransmitters like serotonin, for example, seem to increase when rats and mice are exposed to high temperatures, according to multiple studies. The heat may also interfere with the way networks in our brains communicate with each other. It might affect the way oxygen reaches our brain cells.
“There are so many biological reasons why brains may be negatively affected by heat,” says Wortzel.
Emerging research suggests that for whatever reason, children and young people are among the most vulnerable. In research published earlier this week, Wortzel and his colleagues saw a 2.97% increase in the suicide rate among people in the US aged 15 to 24 for every 1 °C increase in average monthly temperature. That’s more than double the increase seen in people over the age of 24 (which is concerning in its own right).
Other work hints that heat exposure might have long-term consequences for children’s brain development. Babies who were exposed to either extreme heat or cold appeared to have altered white matter by the time they were nine to 12 years old—although it’s not clear how these impacts might affect an individual child.
“It seems that extreme temperature exposure for very young children may affect their brain development,” says Lawrence, who spoke to me from Oxford. She was meant to be in London for Climate Action Week, but her event, which focused on extreme heat, ended up being canceled … owing to the extreme heat.
We are living through the effects of climate change. And that brings a new urgency to the question of how heat affects our brains. Children born in 2020 are predicted to experience around seven times the number of heat waves their grandparents did, says Lawrance. “[We] need to be serious about adapting to a warming world.”
This article first appeared in The Checkup, MIT Technology Review’s weekly biotech newsletter. To receive it in your inbox every Thursday, and read articles like this first, sign up here.
Angry Kids: Dealing With Explosive Behavior
When a child — even a small child — melts down and becomes aggressive, they can pose a serious risk to themselves and others, including parents and siblings.
It’s not uncommon for kids who have trouble handling their emotions to lose control and direct their distress at a caregiver — screaming and cursing, throwing dangerous objects, or hitting and biting. It can be a scary, stressful experience for you and your child, too. Children often feel sorry after they’ve worn themselves out and calmed down.
So what are you to do?
It’s helpful to first understand that behavior is communication. A child who is so overwhelmed that they are lashing out is a distressed child. They don’t have the skill to manage their feelings and express them in a more mature way. They may lack language, impulse control, or problem-solving abilities.
Sometimes parents see this kind of explosive behavior as manipulative. But kids who lash out are usually unable to handle frustration or anger in a more effective way — say, by talking and figuring out how to achieve what they want.
Nonetheless, how you react when a child lashes out has an effect on whether they will continue to respond to distress in the same way or learn better ways to handle feelings so they don’t become overwhelming.
Behavioral techniques for anger management
Here are some pointers to help kids learn techniques to regulate their emotions:
- Stay calm. Faced with a raging child, it’s easy to feel out of control and find yourself yelling at them. But when you shout, you have less chance of reaching them. Instead, you will only be making them more aggressive and defiant. As hard as it may be, if you can stay calm and in control of your own emotions, you can be a model for your child and teach them to do the same thing.
- Don’t give in. Don’t encourage them to continue this behavior by agreeing to what they want in order to make it stop.
- Praise appropriate behavior. When they have calmed down, praise them for pulling themselves together. And when they do try to express their feelings verbally, calmly, or try to find a compromise on an area of disagreement, praise them for those efforts.
- Help them practice problem-solving skills. When your child is not upset is the time to help them try out communicating their feelings and coming up with solutions to conflicts before they escalate into aggressive outbursts. You can ask them how they feel and how they think you might solve a problem.
- Time-outs and reward systems. Time-outs for nonviolent misbehavior can work well with children younger than 7 or 8 years old. When using time-outs, be sure to be consistent with them and balance them with other, more positive forms of attention. If a child is too old for time-outs, you want to move to a system of positive reinforcement for appropriate behavior — points or tokens toward something they want.
- Avoid triggers. Vasco Lopes, PsyD, a clinical psychologist, says most kids who have frequent meltdowns do it at very predictable times, like homework time, bedtime, or when it’s time to stop playing, whether it’s Legos or video games. The trigger is usually being asked to do something they don’t like, or to stop doing something they do like. Time warnings (“we’re going in 10 minutes”), breaking tasks down into one-step directions (“first, put on your shoes”), and preparing your child for situations (“please ask to be excused before you leave Grandma’s table”) can all help avoid meltdowns.
What kind of tantrum is it?
How you respond to a tantrum also depends on its severity. The first rule in handling nonviolent tantrums is to ignore them as often as possible, since even negative attention, like telling the child to stop, can be encouraging.
But when a child is getting physical, ignoring is not recommended since it can result in harm to others as well as your child. In this situation, Dr. Lopes advises putting the child in a safe environment that does not give them access to you or any other potential rewards.
Critics of time-outs argue that they can be emotionally isolating for kids, but research shows that they are effective and do not cause children harm. (For more on the debate around time-outs, read our full article on the topic.) However, it’s very important to use them as just one technique in a nurturing, supportive parenting strategy. Be sure to balance use of time outs with lots of praise for kids’ positive behaviors. It’s also important to manage your own stress so that kids can learn how to regulate their emotions from your positive example.
If the child is young (usually 7 or younger), try placing them in a time out chair. If they won’t stay in the chair, take them to a backup area where they can calm down on their own without anyone else in the room. Again, for this approach to work there shouldn’t be any toys or games in the area that might make it rewarding.
Your child should stay in that room for one minute and must be calm before they are allowed out. Then they should come back to the chair for time out. “What this does is gives your child an immediate and consistent consequence for their aggression and it removes all access to reinforcing things in their environment,” explains Dr. Lopes.
If you have an older child who is being aggressive and you aren’t able to carry them into an isolated area to calm down, Dr. Lopes advises removing yourself from their vicinity. This ensures that they are not getting any attention or reinforcement from you and keeps you safe. In extreme instances, it may be necessary to call 911 to ensure your and your child’s safety.
Help with behavioral techniques
If your child is doing a lot of lashing out — enough that it is frequently frightening you and disrupting your family — it’s important to get some professional help. There are good behavioral therapies that can help you and your child get past the aggression, relieve your stress, and improve your relationship. You can learn techniques for managing their behavior more effectively, and they can learn to rein in disruptive behavior and enjoy a much more positive relationship with you.
- Parent-child interaction therapy (PCIT). PCIT has been shown to be very helpful for children between the ages of 2 and 7. The parent and child work together through a set of exercises while a therapist coaches parents through an ear piece. You learn how to pay more attention to your child’s positive behavior, ignore minor misbehaviors, and provide consistent consequences for negative and aggressive behavior, all while remaining calm.
- Parent management training (PMT). PMT teaches similar techniques as PCIT, though the therapist usually works with parents, not the child.
- Collaborative and Proactive Solutions (CPS). CPS is a program based on the idea that explosive or disruptive behavior is the result of lagging skills rather than, say, an attempt to get attention or test limits. The idea is to teach children the skills they lack to respond to a situation in a more effective way than throwing a tantrum.
Figuring out explosive behavior
Tantrums and meltdowns are especially concerning when they occur more often, more intensely, or past the age in which they’re developmentally expected — those terrible twos up through preschool. As a child gets older, aggression becomes more and more dangerous to you, and the child. And it can become a big problem for them at school and with friends, too.
If your child has a pattern of lashing out it may be because of an underlying problem that needs treatment. Some possible reasons for aggressive behavior include:
- ADHD: Kids with ADHD are frustrated easily, especially in certain situations, such as when they’re supposed to do homework or go to bed.
- Anxiety: An anxious child may keep their worries secret, then lash out when the demands at school or at home put pressure on them that they can’t handle. Often, a child who “keeps it together” at school loses it with one or both parents.
- Undiagnosed learning disability: When your child acts out repeatedly in school or during homework time, it could be because the work is very hard for them.
- Sensory processing issues: Some children have trouble processing the information they are taking in through their senses. Things like too much noise, crowds and even “scratchy” clothes can make them anxious, uncomfortable, or overwhelmed. That can lead to actions that leave you mystified, including aggression.
- Autism: Children with autism spectrum disorder are often prone to meltdowns when they are frustrated or faced with unexpected change. They also often have sensory issues that make them anxious and agitated.
Given that there are so many possible causes for emotional outbursts and aggression, an accurate diagnosis is key to getting the help you need. You may want to start with your pediatrician. They can rule out medical causes and then refer you to a specialist. A trained, experienced child psychologist or psychiatrist can help determine what, if any, underlying issues are present.
When behavioral plans aren’t enough
Professionals agree, the younger you can treat a child, the better. But what about older children and even younger kids who are so dangerous to themselves and others that behavioral techniques aren’t enough to keep them and others around them safe?
- Medication. Medication for underlying conditions such as ADHD and anxiety may make your child more reachable and teachable. Kids with extreme behavior problems are often treated with antipsychotic medications like Risperdal or Abilify. But these medications should be partnered with behavioral techniques.
- Holds. Parent training may, in fact, include learning how to use safe holds on your child so that you can keep both them and yourself out of harm’s way.
- Residential settings. Children with extreme behaviors may need to spend time in a residential treatment facility — sometimes, but not always, in a hospital setting. There, they receive behavioral and, most likely, pharmaceutical treatment. Therapeutic boarding schools provide consistency and structure around the clock, seven days a week. The goal is for the child to internalize self-control so they can come back home with more appropriate behavior with you and the world at large.
- Day treatment. With day treatment, a child with extreme behavioral problems lives at home but attends a school with a strict behavioral plan. Such schools should have trained staff prepared to safely handle crisis situations.
Explosive children need calm, confident parents
It can be challenging work for parents to learn how to handle an aggressive child with behavioral approaches, but for many kids it can make a big difference. Parents who are confident, calm, and consistent can be very successful in helping children develop the anger management skills they need to regulate their own behavior.
This may require more patience and willingness to try different techniques than you might with a typically developing child, but when the result is a better relationship and happier home, it’s well worth the effort.
Frequently Asked Questions
One way to handle a child’s anger is to stay calm when they lose their temper. Controlling your emotions sets an example for the child. You can praise them when they express their feelings calmly and when they calm themselves down after an explosion. Adults who are confident, calm, and consistent help children develop the skills to regulate their behavior.
In parent-child interaction therapy, a therapist coaches parents on how to pay more attention to positive behavior, ignore minor misbehaviors, and provide consistent consequences for negative and aggressive behavior, all while remaining calm. Other forms of therapy also center on teaching the parent how to model emotional stability.
Stay calm and ensure they are in a safe space. Yelling can escalate aggression. Speak in a steady voice, avoid giving in, and use time-outs to prevent meltdowns. When they calm down, praise them for it and for expressing their emotions appropriately. If they are frequently aggressive, behavioral therapy may help.
Children who lash out often lack the skills to manage emotions. Identifying triggers, teaching problem-solving, and using praise or rewards can encourage better behavior. Time-outs work for younger kids, while older ones may need structured reinforcement. If outbursts are severe, you might need professional help. Programs like parent-child interaction therapy (PCIT), parent management training (PMT), or collaborative and practical solutions (CPS) can help.
The post Angry Kids: Dealing With Explosive Behavior appeared first on Child Mind Institute.
Learning shapes neural geometry in the primate prefrontal cortex
Nature Neuroscience, Published online: 25 June 2026; doi:10.1038/s41593-026-02333-w
Learning transforms prefrontal cortex activity from flexible, high-dimensional representations into compact, task-relevant and abstract codes, enabling efficient generalization of learned rules to new stimuli and contexts.
What Europe’s heat wave means for the power grid
It’s been hard to look away from headlines about the European heat wave this week. Temperatures are breaking records across the continent, and the weather is threatening lives, shutting down schools, and in one particularly ironic case, forcing the cancellation of a London Climate Action Week event about extreme heat.
As the summer ramps up and we see this kind of weather sweep around the Northern Hemisphere, I’m always keeping my eye on the power grid. And one notable update that caught my attention this week was news that a nuclear power plant in the south of France had to close down because of the heat.
Climate change is squeezing the grid from all sides, affecting both supply and demand. Heat can affect power availability, from generation to transmission infrastructure, as I covered in my latest story. But climate change is also helping push electricity use higher—and countries in Europe and around the world will need to adapt.
In the US, nearly 90% of homes have air-conditioning. That means many grids see their highest demand in the summer months, and the risk of brownouts and blackouts is at its worst.
People are often quick to cast air-conditioning as a villain, and it’s true that the technology will account for a major chunk of the globe’s rising energy demand in the future. But the reality is that heat waves can be incredibly dangerous, and as climate change pushes temperatures higher, that risk is becoming more real in parts of the world that haven’t historically had to worry quite so much about heat.
In Europe, air-conditioning is historically much less common, with about 20% of homes across the continent using it. Some countries, including those getting hit by this heat wave, have even lower rates—the UK comes in at about 5%, and Germany is around 3%.
But those numbers are starting to tick up as people adapt to increasingly brutal summers. As they do, we should expect higher electricity demand, and stress for the grid—just as in the US. And utilities often have to look across borders to buy more power, driving prices up for everyone.
“The main pressure comes from a triple squeeze: Cooling demand rises sharply, while power plants and grids become less efficient, and some thermal and nuclear plants must cut output because cooling water is too warm or scarce,” says Simone Tagliapietra, senior fellow at Bruegel, an economic and policy think tank, via email.
Grid planning in the age of climate change generally means that we need a lot more supply, and quickly. But one interesting facet to this challenge is that in some places, seasonal patterns are shifting, compounding the difficulty of meeting demand.
Generally, grid operators plan maintenance and outages at power plants around expected peaks in demand. Take nuclear power, for example. In the US, planned outages for maintenance and refueling tend to come in the spring and fall when demand falls below the summer and slightly smaller winter peaks.
Europe, however, has historically seen its grid peak in the winter, because electric heating is more common than air-conditioning. So some planned outages happen in the spring and into the summer, which is affecting the supply right now.
At the Golfech power plant near Toulouse in France, for example, unit two had to shut down this week because of the water temperatures in the nearby river, which is used to cool the reactor. But unit one was already offline because of planned maintenance and refueling, according to EDF, the plant’s operator.
We’re going to continue to see record-high temperatures around the world because of climate change. Communities are adapting, and utilities will have to follow. And if you thought this summer was hot, just wait until next year. With the El Niño weather pattern, 2027 could very well blow these heat waves out of the water.
This article is from The Spark, MIT Technology Review’s weekly climate newsletter. To receive it in your inbox every Wednesday, sign up here.
Social Determinants of Health Improve Disease Risk Prediction Beyond Genetics Alone
A study by researchers at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai has found that social determinants of health—including environmental conditions, health behaviors, access to resources, and social well-being—can contribute as much as or more than genetic risk in predicting several common diseases. The research, published in The American Journal of Human Genetics, showed that incorporating social, behavioral, and environmental information into disease-risk models improved prediction when incorporated with genetic information for conditions including asthma, chronic kidney disease, coronary heart disease, high cholesterol, breast cancer, and prostate cancer.
“Genes are an important part of the equation, but they do not determine destiny,” said senior author Samira Asgari, PhD, an assistant professor of genetics and genomic sciences at Mount Sinai. “We found that the circumstances of people’s lives—their environments, behaviors, and social experiences—can contribute as much as genetics to predicting disease risk. To truly understand health, we have to look at the whole person, not just their DNA.”
According to the researchers, complex diseases arise through the interaction of genetic predisposition with environmental, behavioral, and social influences, yet these factors are often studied in isolation. Existing genetic models often rely on polygenic risk scores, while epidemiological approaches focus on lifestyle, environmental exposures, or social factors independently. The researchers sought to bridge that gap by integrating both types of data into a single risk prediction framework.
To conduct the study, the team analyzed data from 413,457 participants in the All of Us Research Program, a nationwide research effort in the U.S. supported by the National Institutes of Health. The team combined genetic information, electronic health records, and survey responses, with more than 100 environmental, behavioral, and social variables were evaluated, to create a broad picture of the different factors that may influence health.
Rather than selecting a limited number of known social risk factors in advance for their survey, the researchers used a statistical technique called multiple correspondence analysis, or MCA. The approach converted more than 100 categorical social, environmental, and behavioral measures into low-dimensional representations that helped identify patterns of non-genetic risk.
The choice to use MCA distinguished the study from many previous approaches. Past methods often have depended on selecting a small set of established risk factors or using statistical procedures that prioritize only the strongest predictors. By contrast, MCA identifies patterns across many correlated variables simultaneously, allowing researchers to examine broader social and environmental variables without assuming beforehand which factors have the most influence on health.
The analysis found known contributors to disease risk such as economic status and smoking, but also identified factors that receive less attention in published studies, including loneliness and spirituality. First author Abhijith Biji, a PhD candidate at Icahn School of Medicine, said the data showing associations involving loneliness was particularly notable.
“Some risk factors, such as smoking, have been studied extensively for decades,” Biji said. “What is especially intriguing is that we also observed associations involving factors like loneliness. Understanding how these experiences may become biologically embedded could open new avenues for research and ultimately improve our understanding of disease.”
When the researchers incorporated the MCA-derived measures into prediction models alongside demographic information and polygenic risk scores, predictive performance improved across all six diseases studied. For four of the six diseases, the gains from the MCA-based measures exceeded those attributable to polygenic risk scores.
The findings also suggested that genetic and non-genetic influences generally act independently rather than modifying one another. The researchers found little evidence for broad gene-environment interactions. Instead, inherited genetic risk and social, behavioral, and environmental context appeared to contribute additively to disease risk.
“This additive relationship suggests that interventions targeting social and behavioral factors can reduce disease risk regardless of genetic background, offering hope for broadly applicable public-health strategies,” the researchers wrote.
The researchers noted that the study does not establish causation. Because many survey responses were collected at a single point in time and some exposures may have occurred after disease onset, the findings should be considered as contributions to disease-risk prediction rather than proof that specific factors cause disease.
Building on this work, the team next will seek to integrate social determinants of health with additional biological measures and look mechanisms that may directly connect social experiences to disease. The investigators will also bring in longitudinal data, harmonize survey instruments across cohorts, and integrating other data types to better understand how environmental, behavioral, and social factors influence disease development and interact with biological processes.
“Our goal is to build a more complete understanding of health and disease,” Asgari said. “By combining genetics with social and environmental context, we can move toward risk models that better reflect the realities of people’s lives and help advance more personalized approaches to health.”
The post Social Determinants of Health Improve Disease Risk Prediction Beyond Genetics Alone appeared first on Inside Precision Medicine.
Scaling Stem-Cell Manufacturing for Therapies
Human pluripotent stem cells (hPSCs) have long been viewed as one of regenerative medicine’s most promising raw materials. Now, as more than 100 clinical trials evaluate hPSC-derived therapies for diseases ranging from Parkinson’s disease to heart failure and type 1 diabetes, attention is turning toward a crucial challenge: how to manufacture these cells reliably and economically at industrial scale.
According to Kevin Cyrys and Robert Zweigerdt, PhD, both of Hannover Medical School in Germany, the field has entered a new phase. Rather than simply demonstrating that stem cells can be grown in bioreactors, researchers are increasingly focused on creating robust production platforms that can deliver consistent quality across facilities and patient populations.
“Human pluripotent stem cells can serve as an unlimited, renewable ‘raw material’ for essentially any therapeutic cell product,” the authors wrote, highlighting the technology’s potential to overcome limitations associated with donor-derived tissues and organs.
The manufacturing challenge is substantial. While some therapies, such as treatments for age-related macular degeneration, require only tens of thousands of cells per dose, others may demand billions of cells for a single patient treatment. Conventional laboratory-scale methods are unlikely to meet such requirements efficiently.
To address this gap, developers are increasingly adopting three-dimensional suspension cultures in bioreactors. Compared with traditional two-dimensional cell culture systems, bioreactors provide tighter control over temperature, oxygen levels, pH, and carbon dioxide while supporting automated, closed-system manufacturing compatible with good manufacturing practice (GMP) standards.
The field has already demonstrated notable progress across multiple therapeutic areas. Researchers have developed scalable processes for producing cardiomyocytes, pancreatic islet cells, hepatocyte-like cells, neural tissues, and immune effectors derived from hPSCs. Some cardiac manufacturing platforms have reported production of billions of cardiomyocytes in liter-scale bioreactors, while immune-cell manufacturing programs have successfully expanded induced pluripotent stem cell-derived natural killer cells in 1–10 L systems while maintaining product quality.
Yet scaling production involves more than increasing cell yields. “Industrial-scale success depends on more than headline totals,” Cyrys and Zweigerdt note, citing the importance of volumetric productivity, production time, reproducibility, and integration of expansion, differentiation, and downstream processing into a coherent GMP-ready workflow.
Looking ahead, Cyrys and Zweigerdt argue that the next generation of stem-cell manufacturing will be defined by data-driven process control. They predict that AI-enabled systems will help move the industry from retrospective quality analysis toward real-time decision support, ultimately improving comparability between batches and strengthening product definitions across manufacturing networks.
Despite ongoing challenges involving cost, quality control, and regulatory compliance, the authors conclude that stem-cell bioprocessing has already crossed an important threshold. Scalable culture systems are no longer the primary obstacle. Instead, the focus has shifted toward engineering reliable industrial processes capable of transforming complex stem-cell biology into reproducible therapeutic products.
The post Scaling Stem-Cell Manufacturing for Therapies appeared first on GEN – Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology News.