Social cognitive deficits and altered multi-brain dynamics during problem-solving in heroin abstainers: An fNIRS hyperscanning study

Despite extensive research on the neurobiology of addiction, little is known about how repeated drug use and withdrawal are related to social functioning impairments in humans, a highly social species. This obscures the broader societal impact of drug addiction and limits treatment efficacy. This study examined social cognitive impairment and its multi-brain neural underpinnings during socially interactive problem-solving in heroin use disorder (HUD), and further explored their co-occurrence with protracted withdrawal symptoms.

The Unspoken Toll: Why Exam Pressure Must Be Part of the Youth Mental Health Discussion

A Conversation with Tatum Redmond and Amanda van der Vyver-Anderson from Community Keepers, South Africa


By Mai El Shoush, Partnerships Campaign Manager, Stavros Niarchos Foundation (SNF) Global Center for Child and Adolescent Mental Health at the Child Mind Institute


Community Keepers is an award-winning organization based in Stellenbosch, South Africa, which works to improve the social and emotional well-being of learners and their caregivers. The SNF Global Center at the Child Mind Institute works with the organization to further advance the comprehensive mission of transforming schools into safe spaces where student well-being is prioritized alongside academic achievement. This includes strengthening the workforce to expand evidence-based support and brief interventions through low-intensity psychological therapy approaches.

While addressing the workforce gaps, the partnership has yielded valuable insight into the essential competencies front line workers require to effectively support young people experiencing mental health challenges. Together with other NGOs, Community Keepers has also been instrumental in strengthening the process of developing context-sensitive and culturally appropriate training materials scheduled for pilot implementation in South Africa later this year – representing an important step towards strengthening mental health care systems for underserved communities. The partnership also extends beyond training development, as the SNF Global Center at the Child Mind Institute continues to collaborate closely with Community Keepers on an upcoming randomized control trial (RCT). The scientific evaluation will assess both the feasibility of establishing a virtual clinic for young people and the effectiveness of remotely delivered cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) interventions via video consultations. The research is intended to expand access to equitable and quality mental health care for young people across South Africa. Tatum Redmond has been a care facilitator in one of the Community Keepers’ high school-based offices, while Amanda van der Vyver-Anderson is an educational psychologist and heads the training and development of Mental Health First Aiders for internal and external staff.

Amanda van der Vyver-Anderson

How important is it to approach issues such as academic pressure within the wider conversation around youth mental health in South Africa, and beyond?

It is critical to integrate discussions of exam stress into the broader dialogue surrounding youth mental health, both here in South Africa and internationally. We see countless students under immense pressure to not only pass, but also secure their future prospects and meet family expectations. This is unfortunately often dismissed as “just school” or a “normal” experience. However, it impacts a substantial number of young people, often more severely than we acknowledge. And the level of support available is not equitable across the board. Addressing this is crucial because of the detrimental effects on core cognitive functions — and ultimately, academic performance — as well as the significant toll on mental health. This can manifest as anxiety, burnout, and even depression.

In what ways can exam-related stress connect to broader mental health challenges?

While a certain level of stress can serve as a beneficial motivator, severe distress can lead to cognitive shutdown. This specifically impacts the executive functions — planning, organizing, prioritizing, working memory, focus, and concentration — that are fundamental to preparing for exams. This shutdown can then create a detrimental, ongoing cycle of heightened stress about exams or the future, coupled with a decline in the ability to take effective action.

It’s vital to recognize that exam stress does not merely stay in the exam room — it can be a gateway to larger mental health challenges. Constant stress regarding school performance, marks, or the fear of failure can escalate into conditions like anxiety, chronic overwhelm, or depression. Students may experience sleep disruption, poor nutrition, and feelings of inadequacy. And these symptoms often persist long after the test is over. Compounding this is the reluctance of most students to seek help because they believe their feelings are normal or fear appearing weak. Yet, if left unaddressed, sustained pressure along with these symptoms can profoundly affect their psychological well-being.

Tatum Redmond

What role do community-focused organizations such as Community Keepers play in linking academic stress to systematic youth mental health support and improvement?

Organizations like Community Keepers play a truly pivotal role — not merely as emergency responders but as an integrated support system within educational institutions as well. Crucially, they move beyond immediate crisis response by collaborating with schools to develop long-term support and to provide safe spaces to engage in dialogue. They offer genuine attention and care when learners are struggling with school demands, exams, and family pressures.

The approach is not just “addressing stress today” but asking, “How can we create an enduring environment where young people feel safe, supported, and connected?” Doing this requires collaboration with the learners themselves, educators and school staff, as well as parents, caregivers, and community leaders.

What factors make schools uniquely positioned to be safe and supportive spaces?
Schools are exceptionally well-positioned to serve as safe and supportive spaces for students for several key reasons:

  • Learners spend a substantial portion of their day at school, making it a primary setting where adults can observe signs of distress, anxiety, or coping difficulties.
  • Schools have the opportunity to house critical personnel — teachers, counselors, and external partners like Community Keepers — who are on hand to offer support or a listening ear.
  • The curriculum can extend beyond academic skills and learning. It can include mental health and emotional literacy, stress management, and peer support.
  • When a school actively fosters an environment of safety, respect, and validation, it fundamentally alters how learners navigate pressure, stress, or complex personal problems. Having a guaranteed safe space at school is deeply stabilizing for the mind.

How can the goal of securing mental health support as a pillar of education be reached?
Achieving the goal of establishing mental health support as a solid, non-negotiable pillar of education requires several strategic commitments:

  • Schools must actively allocate resources for it, ensuring adequate numbers of support staff, rather than relying on minimal provision. Teachers need training to recognize signs of distress and respond helpfully and appropriately.
  • Mental health literacy must be integrated into the curriculum. Instead of only focusing on academic subjects, topics like stress management, emotional intelligence, and maintaining healthy relationships should be covered.
  • The government must demonstrate a serious commitment, including mental health support in education budgets, developing clear policies, and ensuring rigorous follow-through.

How have your practices and initiatives in promoting and supporting schools as safe spaces made meaningful change?
We’ve observed tangible change in the learners’ attitudes; those who feel comfortable expressing their emotions are generally happier and more resilient because they have established a safe, non-judgmental space where trust is built.

What role can teachers and school leadership play as partners in creating an evidence-based supportive learning environment? Where are the gaps in building capacity and how can they be better supported?
Educators and school leadership are essential partners in establishing an environment that successfully supports learner mental health and cultivates a culture of well-being. They can do so by:

  • Prioritizing both the physical space and curriculum time necessary for learners to engage with support services.
  • Serving as role models who embody and encourage emotional regulation and actively normalize help-seeking behaviour.
  • Remaining deeply cognisant of factors that contribute to learner distress so as to not inadvertently exacerbate it.

Investing in staff wellness and support, capacity building, and policy reform is not merely beneficial, but a foundational requirement to capacitate educators effectively. This allows them to sustainably support the mental health of their entire school community.

The SNF Global Center’s work in South Africa is carried out through the Child and Adolescent Mental Health Initiative (CAMHI South Africa). We are proud to expand the partnership with Community Keepers and value their collaboration towards co-creating scalable, school-centered mental health approaches that authentically respond to the diverse lived-experiences of young people.

The post The Unspoken Toll: Why Exam Pressure Must Be Part of the Youth Mental Health Discussion appeared first on Child Mind Institute.

AI Chatbots for Mental Health Self-Management: Lived Experience–Centered Qualitative Study

Background: Large language models (LLMs) now enable chatbots to engage in sensitive mental health conversations, including depression self-management. Yet their rapid deployment often overlooks how well these tools align with the priorities of people with lived experiences, which can introduce harms such as inaccurate information, lack of empathy, or inadequate crisis support. Objective: This study explores how people with lived experience of depression experience an LLM-based mental health chatbot in self-management contexts, and what perceived benefits, limitations, and concerns inform harm-mitigating design implications. Methods: We developed a technology probe (a GPT-4o–based chatbot named Zenny) designed to simulate depression self-management scenarios grounded in prior research. We conducted interviews with 17 individuals with lived experiences of depression, who interacted with Zenny during the session. We applied qualitative content analysis to interview transcripts, notes, and chat logs using sensitizing concepts related to values and harms. Results: We identified 3 themes shaping participants’ evaluations: (1) informational accuracy and applicability, including concerns about incorrect or misleading information, vagueness, and fit with personal constraints; (2) emotional support vs need for human connection, including validation and a judgment-free space alongside perceived limits of machine empathy; and (3) a personalization-privacy dilemma, where participants wanted more tailored guidance while withholding sensitive information and using privacy-preserving tactics. Conclusions: People with lived experience of depression evaluated LLM-based mental health chatbots through intertwined priorities of actionable information, emotional validation with clear limits, and personalization that does not require unsafe data disclosure. These findings suggest concrete design strategies to mitigate harms and support LLM-based tools as complements to, rather than replacements for, human support and recovery.
<img src="https://jmir-production.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/thumbs/78ae955c189d2dea8e926c80ddf7b242" />

Impact of abnormal metabolic-immunoinflammatory pathway on splenomegaly in patients with chronic schizophrenia and exploration of risk factors: case-control study

ObjectiveThis study aimed to identify risk factors for splenomegaly in chronic schizophrenia patients and clarify associations among metabolic−immunoinflammatory pathways, psychiatric symptoms and splenomegaly. The findings will help optimize somatic monitoring and intervention strategies.MethodsA case−control design was used. A total of 426 patients were assigned to splenomegaly (n= 165) and non−splenomegaly (n= 261) groups according to abdominal ultrasound. Demographic data, clinical information, and antipsychotic use were collected. Mental symptoms were assessed by the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale. Hematological indicators were detected, and abdominal ultrasound was performed to evaluate spleen morphology and fatty liver occurrence. SPSS 24.0 was used for statistical analysis, including univariate analysis and binary logistic regression to screen influencing factors of splenomegaly.ResultsThe splenomegaly group had significantly higher levels of lipoprotein(a), cholesterol, triglycerides, HbA1c, CRP, IL-6 and β2-microglobulin than the non-splenomegaly group (all p < 0.05). The incidence of fatty liver and PANSS negative symptom score were significantly higher in the splenomegaly group, while the usage rate of aripiprazole was lower (p< 0.05). Binary logistic regression showed that HbA1c (OR = 1.797, p = 0.046) and PANSS negative symptom score (OR = 2.258, p = 0.003) were independently associated with splenomegaly. Aripiprazole use was associated with lower odds of splenomegaly (OR = 0.656, p = 0.041).ConclusionSplenomegaly in chronic schizophrenia patients is closely linked to metabolic abnormalities and immunoinflammatory activation. Prominent negative symptoms are independently associated with splenomegaly and may serve as an early warning signal. Aripiprazole use is independently associated with reduced odds of splenomegaly.

Facing the Monster: My Journey Living with OCD and Finding Hope

by David Kedeme

I remember the day my white high top Puma sneakers my parents gifted me for Christmas became the exact opposite of the color they came boxed in. It was a post rainy day in middle school, on a mulch covered, semi grassy area we considered our soccer field with two benches representing goals. After enjoying an intense match, what I did not enjoy but assumingly brushed off was the fact of how dirty my shoes were. Fast forward to later that day, I spent hours cleaning the shoes, trying to restore them to their original look.

Something felt different than other times I cleaned.

Every speck had to be clean. The more time I spent, the more visible other “not as clean” areas of the shoes became, requiring their own dedicated time of cleaning. Slowly, this cascaded into many other aspects of life such as my bedroom and closet needing to be organized a certain way, a tornado of relentless doubts concerning my relationships, with this dark monster in my head controlling what I can do, think, and feel. It felt like an eternity but at the same time as if no time passed from when I first touched to clean those shoes to when I could not sleep in my own bedroom and instead slept downstairs due to not wanting to mess the space up and not being able to enter and exit my closet as easily, so needing to rewear clothes days on end. I thought that doing what the monster or voice or whatever it was wanted would lead me to peace, as the relief from the sky high anxiety and gloom that came from performing what I know now as compulsions came only to have what I learned were obsessions come back, if not stronger, reinforcing this vicious cycle. My parents noticed my change in behavior, from avoiding my room at most costs to being late to dinner by up to an hour or two at times. I had only vaguely heard of obsessive compulsive disorder, OCD, and brought the idea up to my parents. The landscape we were dealing with was completely new and I felt even more alone due to this in addition to the isolation the condition induces you to be in. But we began to look for therapists, where I started talk therapy, with the therapist trying their best but the therapy modality was not the right one for me. Next up was a hypnotherapist, which also did not work for me. I needed some action to be okay with the high emotion filled state I was in when the bouts came on, in other words, exposure and response prevention therapy. After doing some research, I landed upon NOCD, an OCD teletherapy and advocacy organization.

I could not believe what I was hearing through the basement, not my room, laptop screen about actually going into my room, and that was not even the worst part. I just had to open my closet, take clothes out, move items in my room, and not do anything. “Maybe it is, maybe it is not” was a phrase that my therapist told me throughout therapy. With the significant support of my family, therapist, and friends, I was able to be okay with not being okay. Exposure and response prevention therapy makes you face the monster, making you enter the state in which you experience high anxiety. The therapy makes you look the monster in the face and realize it was not that big, not talking or engaging with you, making you sit in the discomfort and not do anything you so desperately want to do. With this methodology and rigor, I was able to coexist with the beast, and slowly it shrank, still existing though. But that is okay. That happens.

OCD belongs to a category of disorders called Obsessive Compulsive and Related Disorders within the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, a manual that influences not only how patients receive care but also research funding and medical training. Although not officially recognized in the manual, there are many discussed subtypes of OCD depending on the obsessions and or compulsions one experiences. Some people, like me, had symptoms that ebbed and flowed in terms of severity and percolated from subtype to subtype. My symptoms throughout my experience with the condition range from having to keep most of the items in my room a certain way, doubting whether I want to be with my partner, questioning my morals, wondering whether something happened in the past pertaining to people in my life even though it did not, and more. Throughout typing this, thoughts flood my head, similar to ones I experienced, say, six years ago.

I hope to be able to perform research in the condition as well as treat people who were and are in my shoes. With up to 242 million people worldwide meeting clinical diagnostic criteria for OCD, about 40 to 60 percent experiencing treatment resistant OCD, more than two thirds of the general public not being able to accurately identify OCD, and mental health still being stigmatized today, there is more needed to be done from all fronts. When one type of online treatment is sought, about two thirds of patients achieve a clinically significant outcome, but on average, it takes greater than seven years for someone to receive a diagnosis of OCD and it can take up to seventeen years for an individual diagnosed with OCD to receive treatment. This is a multifaceted problem that requires a multifaceted approach which requires a banding of people worldwide to come together to promote awareness of the condition and a safe space for people throughout who have OCD.

Today, as I am typing this, I still am experiencing many of the symptoms I have before. The condition does not just go away, but it does become more manageable. If you are struggling, there is hope, there is a way, no matter how impossible it feels. I felt as if there was none, no light at the end of the tunnel, spending many hours crying out asking why to a source I was not even aware of, answered only by my own repetitive thoughts. But as someone who has been there, you will be okay. Even if multiple therapeutic modalities do not work, you feel like you want to give up because a current exposure seems impossible to do, you feel more anxiety at times, you feel like you are letting people down if you do not improve, you feel like the monster you were once fighting off keeps going, keep going. Seek help in many ways, rely on your community, and for those who have a hard time finding one, we are here for you, the International OCD Foundation community, and I most certainly am as well. Thank you for reading this and I am sending you hope and luck wherever you are. You are never alone.

The post Facing the Monster: My Journey Living with OCD and Finding Hope appeared first on International OCD Foundation.

Commercial or industrial use of mental health data for research: primer and best-practice guidelines from the DATAMIND patient/public Lived Experience Advisory Group

BackgroundRoutinely collected health data, such as that held by United Kingdom (UK) national health services (NHS), has important research uses. However, its use requires public trust and transparency. Access by commercial/industrial organisations is especially sensitive for the public, as is mental health (MH) data. Although existing MH data science guidelines emphasise patient/public involvement (PPI), they do not cover commercial uses specifically.ObjectivesTo develop patient- and public-led guidelines for the commercial and industrial use of MH data for research. Though UK-focused, their principles may apply internationally.MethodsA PPI Lived Experience Advisory Group (LEAG) was created within DATAMIND, a UK data hub for MH informatics. Initial discussion yielded a requirement for definitions and explanations of concepts relating to MH data research, developed iteratively. Subsequently, the LEAG developed guidelines via a qualitative quasi-Delphi approach. The agreed scope excluded data provided for research with informed consent, data processing arrangements (e.g. companies hosting electronic systems on the instruction of health services), and compliance with legal minimum requirements. The scope included the use of routinely collected MH data for research by commercial/industrial organisations without explicit consent, and aspects of industry-led MH data collection conducted with consent.ResultsAlongside the primer in MH data research concepts, the LEAG provide best-practice guidelines relating to commercial/industrial research use of MH data, for organisations controlling MH data (such as NHS bodies) and for commercial applicants seeking access. Core principles include transparency, patient rights, meaningful PPI, stringent governance, and statistical disclosure control. The guidelines recommend a risk–benefit approach to assessing data access applications, within limits that include avoiding the export of unconsented patient-level data outside NHS-controlled secure data environments, and not providing commercial applicants with access to unconsented free-text MH data. Further recommendations for NHS executive and regulatory bodies relate to public choice and transparency, clarity of guidance to research-active NHS organisations, and support for de-identification.ConclusionsMH data research requires patient/public involvement and understanding. These guidelines reflect the views of people with personal or family experience of mental ill health. We hope they are useful to the MH research community and increase public transparency and trust.

Synergies in psychedelic-assisted therapy: a qualitative interview study of psychotherapeutic processes

Research on the therapeutic effects of psychedelics in psychiatry, commonly referred to as Psychedelic-Assisted Therapy (PAT), has expanded substantially in recent years. The context-dependent nature of psychedelics has sparked discussion about the importance of the psychotherapeutic environment in achieving beneficial outcomes. This study explores the contribution of psychotherapeutic factors on PAT in Switzerland, where psychedelic treatments can be implemented within long-term clinical frameworks. Seven semi-structured interviews were conducted with Swiss therapists to explore how they frame psychedelic treatments and the role of the psychotherapeutic setting in facilitating therapeutic outcomes. Thereby, individual experiences of the patients as reported by the therapists, were particularly considered. Thematic analysis identified two main themes, each with several sub-themes. The first theme revealed that while psychotherapeutic techniques are adapted to PAT, they retain similarities to non-psychedelic psychotherapy practices, supporting patients in having meaningful therapeutic experiences. The second theme describes a synergistic relationship between psychedelics and psychotherapy, amplifying underlying general psychotherapeutic factors such as trust, a sense of profundity, and the emergence of therapeutic experiences. The interviewed therapists agreed that psychedelics work as unspecific catalysts for psychotherapeutic processes, while still acknowledging the potential for psychopharmacological effects or the interaction between psychedelics and psychotherapy to create unique psychotherapeutic processes. Findings from our sample suggest that, for specific indications, incorporating psychedelics into long-term psychotherapeutic treatment may strengthen therapeutic processes. Future research could investigate the efficacy of PAT within the framework of specific psychotherapeutic modalities or in different settings, including prospective quantitative assessments of outcomes. Ultimately, clarifying mechanisms of action of PAT may help to enhance its efficacy and potentially to integrate psychedelic treatments into mainstream mental health care.

Asking for help: the development of a simulation-based mental health application to enhance depression literacy, mental health communication, and help-seeking among Black autistic youth

Black autistic youth experience disproportionately high rates of depression and face intersecting barriers such as racial discrimination, stigma, and limited access to care, yet few interventions address their needs. This study introduces Asking for Help (A4H), a culturally responsive, simulation-based intervention designed to improve depression literacy and help-seeking skills through an e-learning module and interactive conversation practice. Guided by mental health literacy theory, the Theory of Help-Seeking Behavior, the Theory of Planned Behavior, and Disability Critical Theory, A4H was developed using community-engaged and user-centered design principles. Usability testing employed a mixed-methods design with 32 participants (12 youth, 10 caregivers, 8 specialists) using the System Usability Scale (SUS), Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), and semi-structured interviews. Black autistic youth reported moderate depressive symptoms (mean PHQ-9 = 14.7) and rated usability slightly below benchmark (mean SUS = 66.2), while caregivers and specialists scored higher (73.5 and 71.0). Qualitative feedback highlighted cultural relevance and immediate feedback as strengths, with recommendations for simplified language, improved navigation, and multimodal supports; emotional safety and trust were critical for engagement. No short-term symptom change was observed, consistent with the formative design. Findings indicate A4H is feasible and culturally responsive but requires refinements before efficacy testing to assess impacts on literacy, help-seeking intentions, and communication skills.