Background: Rapid digital transformation is reshaping health care, but many digital initiatives struggle to deliver sustained organizational value when they are introduced as stand-alone technologies rather than as part of an institutional strategy. In Saudi Arabia, Vision 2030 has intensified pressure on academic medical centers to strengthen digital capability, localize innovation, and reduce dependence on externally driven solutions. Objective: This study aimed to examine organizational factors shaping digital health innovation at King Saud University Medical City (KSUMC) and to develop a preliminary strategic planning framework for a digital health innovation hub tailored to that setting. Methods: We conducted a qualitative exploratory case study at KSUMC between April and June 2025. Fourteen stakeholders from clinical, administrative, research, governance, educational, and innovation-related roles were recruited using maximum variation purposive sampling. Semistructured interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis. Reporting was guided by the COREQ (Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research). Diffusion of innovation theory and systems thinking informed interpretation, while a context-actor-mechanism-outcome lens was used to examine how institutional conditions shaped innovation processes. No patient data were collected. Results: Five interrelated themes were identified. First, leadership support existed at a symbolic level, but middle-management translation and risk tolerance were inconsistent. Second, innovation was constrained by workload, fragmented systems, and weak operational support, which meant that project work was often treated as discretionary rather than embedded. Third, knowledge transfer and commercialization pathways were fragmented; participants repeatedly described unclear routes from idea generation to prototyping, regulatory review, and market engagement. Fourth, incentives and innovation capability were misaligned with institutional expectations, particularly for clinicians and trainees. Fifth, Vision 2030 created strategic legitimacy and momentum, but participants also cautioned that an overreliance on consultant-led or vendor-led approaches could weaken internal capability building. These findings informed a preliminary framework centered on governance, knowledge transfer, partnership structures, workforce development, and phased implementation rather than a validated institutional model. Conclusions: At KSUMC, digital health innovation is shaped not only by technology availability but also by organizational culture, intermediary structures, governance design, and the extent to which innovation work is made operationally feasible. The framework proposed here should therefore be understood as a preliminary planning model derived from one qualitative case study. Its main contribution is to specify how knowledge transfer, commercialization, and institutional capability building can be integrated into a digital health strategy within a Saudi academic medical center.
<img src="https://jmir-production.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/thumbs/85d230b912fdefe6673792b1fe27c5d2" />
A Self-Guided Mobile Mindfulness Intervention Embedded in Daily Routines for Adults With Mild to Moderate Psychological Distress: Randomized Controlled Trial
enDigital Postpartum Support for Early Risk Identification Among Postpartum Women: Formative Randomized Evaluation and Exploratory Predictive Modeling Study
VISUCHIR 2024 Ecological Benchmarking of French Private Centers Using a Perioperative Digital Therapeutic: Descriptive Early-Adopter Comparison
Using publicly available 2024 VISUCHIR (Visualisation de la Chirurgie) benchmarking indicators, we performed a descriptive ecological comparison of national private-sector values and 4 early-adopter French private departments implementing the Betty Coaching perioperative digital pathway; early-adopter departments showed a directionally favorable, unadjusted profile for same-day discharge, mean length of stay, and VISUCHIR-reported readmission-evolution indicators, without causal inference.
<img src="https://jmir-production.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/thumbs/15445ada73db488de7475c790390a086" />
STAT+: At key hearing, Kennedy’s ouster of former CDC director looms over nominee to replace her
The fates of two top health officials — Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Susan Monarez — loomed over a Wednesday Senate hearing, though neither of them was in the room.
Almost a year after Kennedy ousted Monarez as director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention over vaccine policy, senators pressed the administration’s new pick to run the CDC on whether she’d face a similar fate, and how she’d deal with what many of them characterized as Kennedy’s political interference in the agency.
The nominee, Erica Schwartz, repeatedly demurred on the question, never quite saying whether she would stand up to the health secretary.
Increased Levels of Micro- and Nanoplastics Found in the Blood of Heart Attack Patients
The results of a newly reported study have shown that people who suffered a serious heart attack had higher levels of micro- and nanoplastics (MNPs) in their blood, compared with MNP levels in patients diagnosed with chronic ischemic heart disease and those who have normal blood vessels supplying the heart. The study findings also revealed that people who smoke and people exposed to higher levels of air pollution had higher levels of micro- and nanoplastics in their blood.
Headed by teams at Sapienza University of Rome, at the University of Verona, and at the Research Centre on Environmental Pollution and Cardiovascular Diseases at the University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli,” the study included 61 patients at Sant’Andrea University Hospital or Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata of Verona, diagnosed with either a heart attack, chronic ischemic heart disease, or normal coronary arteries.
The researchers say their study adds to growing evidence that environmental pollution may affect cardiovascular health. Research lead Emanuele Barbato, MD, PhD, at Sapienza University of Rome, said, “These findings do not prove that microplastics cause heart attacks, but they reveal a strong association between environmental exposures, microplastics in the blood and cardiovascular disease. In our study, smoking history was strongly linked to microplastics in the blood. Our findings suggest that smoking might make it easier for micro and nanoplastics to enter the blood stream via the lungs. Air pollution may act in a similar way.”
Barbato is director of the Cardiology Unit of Sant’Andrea University Hospital, Rome, Italy, and senior author of the team’s published paper in European Heart Journal, titled “Micro- and nano-plastics in the coronary circulation and air pollution exposure in ischemic heart disease presentation.”
Cardiovascular diseases are increasingly related to lifelong environmental exposures, the authors noted. Among such exposures, MNPs are ubiquitous environmental pollutants, and evidence is increasing that they accumulate in human tissues following exposure and are emerging as a risk factor for health. Pasquale Paolisso, MD, PhD, at Sant’Andrea Hospital Sapienza University of Rome, said, “Micro and nanoplastics are tiny plastic particles that are found virtually everywhere in the environment, including the air we breathe, the water we drink, and many foods we consume. In recent years, scientists have begun to detect these particles in human tissues and organs, raising concerns about their potential health effects.”
Research findings have raised concerns about the potential role that MNPs may play in cardiovascular diseases. “Emerging evidence indicates that MNPs, once considered inert contaminants, are biologically active pollutants contributing to the pathophysiology of cardiovascular diseases, particularly by promoting the development and progression of atherosclerotic plaques and potentially triggering adverse cardiovascular events,” the team stated.
However, as Paolisso further noted, “… very little was known about whether these particles are present in the coronary circulation—the blood flowing through the arteries that supply the heart—or whether environmental exposures such as smoking and air pollution might influence their presence.” As the authors explained, “… current knowledge is predominantly based on in vitro experiments and preliminary ex vivo findings, highlighting the need for in vivo and clinical investigations.”
For their newly reported study the team measured MNPs in coronary and peripheral blood, in 61 patients at Sant’Andrea University Hospital or Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata of Verona, who were undergoing coronary angiography for suspected coronary artery disease (CAD). Patients were stratified as those with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), chronic coronary syndromes (CCS) and controls with normal coronary arteries.
As well as taking blood samples from the vessels supplying the heart and from elsewhere in the body, the team collected data on whether the patients were smokers and their exposure to pollution, both on the day of testing and over the preceding two years. Coronary micro and nanoplastics were analyzed at the Research Centre for Environmental Pollution and Cardiovascular Diseases, University of Campania ‘Luigi Vanvitelli,’ a center dedicated to understanding how environmental pollutants influence cardiovascular health.
The results showed that micro and nanoplastics were detected in 84% of patients diagnosed with heart attack, compared with 40% of patients with chronic ischemic heart disease and 32% of patients with normal coronary arteries. “The observation that IL-6 and TNF-α concentrations were highest in STEMI patients, particularly within the coronary circulation, and were more elevated in the presence of detectable MNPs supports an exploratory association between MNP burden and a localized pro-inflammatory milieu in patients with obstructive CAD,” the investigators suggested.
Heart attack patients also had a greater variety of plastic types in their blood. The most common type of plastic was polyethylene (PE), which is commonly used in packaging and consumer products. “Across all study cohorts, PE was the most frequently identified polymer, being present in 97% of the patients with detectable MNPs,” the investigators added.
Patients exposed to higher long-term levels of air pollution (PM2.5; particles measuring 2.5 μm or less in diameter) were more likely to have microplastics in their blood, and smokers were six times more likely to have microplastics in their blood. All patients who were smokers and were exposed to higher air pollution levels had plastics in their blood, compared with only 12.5% of patients who did not smoke and were not exposed to higher levels of air pollution. “MNPs, PM2.5, and smoking constitute potentially modifiable environmental risk factors for cardiovascular diseases, with significant implications for public health and cardiovascular disease prevention,” the scientists stated. “Future research should aim to quantify individual MNP exposure, assess combined pollutant burden, and validate interventions that target this expanded network of environmental cardiovascular hazards.”
Barbato added, “The results highlight the need to consider microplastic pollution as part of the broader environmental determinants of health. Policies that reduce air pollution, tobacco exposure, and environmental plastic contamination could have benefits that extend beyond environmental protection and potentially improve cardiovascular health.”
In an accompanying editorial Andreas Daiber, PhD, at University Medical Centre of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, and colleagues pointed to the observation by Paolisso et al. of an association between NMP levels and exposure to air pollution and tobacco smoking. “While the underlying mechanisms remain unclear, this finding underscores a key principle: environmental exposures rarely occur in isolation,” Daiber and colleagues stated. “Individuals are exposed to multiple environmental stressors simultaneously, including air pollution, noise, chemical contaminants, plastics, and climate-related stressors, especially in the urban setting. These exposures may interact through shared biological pathways, leading to additive or synergistic effects on cardiovascular risk.”
And while substantial uncertainties remain, “the convergence of epidemiological, clinical, and mechanistic evidence suggests that plastic pollution may represent a previously underestimated cardiovascular risk factor,” Daiber et al. continued. “Addressing this challenge will require coordinated efforts across disciplines and policy domains. In the era of the Anthropocene, protecting cardiovascular health will increasingly depend on reducing not only traditional risk factors but also the growing burden of environmental pollutants (the detrimental part of the exposome), among which plastics may soon play a central role.”
The post Increased Levels of Micro- and Nanoplastics Found in the Blood of Heart Attack Patients appeared first on GEN – Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology News.
Specialist Rehabilitation Providers’ Experiences With an Online Self-Compassion Course: Reflexive Thematic Analysis
Ketogenic Diet Shows Opposite Effects on Cancer Risk in Mouse Small Intestine and Colon
Ketogenic diets, originally developed in the 1920s to treat epilepsy, have been adapted in the past few decades as a strategy to lose weight or increase lifespan. This type of diet (a high percentage of fat, low percentage of carbohydrates, and normal or reduced amounts of protein) forces the body to burn fatty acids for energy in place of carbohydrates such as glucose. Burning these lipids produces ketone bodies—primarily β-hydroxybutyrate (BHB) and acetoacetate—as byproducts of fatty acid metabolism. The impact of ketogenic diets on the gastrointestinal tract remains poorly understood.
In recent years, scientists investigated whether this type of diet might affect the development of cancer. While some research has shown that the diet may protect against the development of colon cancer, a new study suggests that in the small intestine, a ketogenic diet may increase the risk of cancer—with a mechanism through fatty acid oxidation rather than ketone metabolism.
This work appears in Nature in the paper, “Ketogenic diet mediates intestinal tumorigenesis through lipids not ketones.”
“Ketogenic diets have distinct effects on different tissues even within the gastrointestinal tract. I think the message here is that we need to be very careful in generalizing the effects that these diets can have, because what might be beneficial for one tissue may be detrimental for another tissue,” says Omer Yilmaz, PhD, director of the MIT Stem Cell Initiative, an associate professor of biology at MIT, and a member of MIT’s Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research.
A 2022 study in Nature suggested that ketogenic diets have a protective effect against colon cancer and that BHB—the most abundant ketone body—is responsible for this effect. In the new study, the MIT team wanted to explore whether ketogenic diets might have a similar protective effect in the small intestine.
The researchers fed mice who were genetically predisposed to developing intestinal cancer either a ketogenic diet, a control diet, or a high fat/high calorie diet. They found that mice on a ketogenic diet were more likely to develop tumors of the small intestine than those on a control diet. While they did not become obese, mice on the ketogenic diet developed tumors at rates similar to or even higher than those of mice on an obesogenic high fat/high calorie diet.
Additional studies revealed that ketone bodies did not play a role in tumor development. Instead, tumor growth was driven by fatty acid oxidation. This pathway activates the PPAR family of proteins, which signal stem cells to multiply more rapidly, increasing the chance that some become cancerous.
Surprisingly, the same ketogenic diet that promoted tumors in the small intestine had the opposite effect in the colon. The researchers found, similar to the earlier study back in 2022, that a ketogenic diet suppressed the development of colon tumors. However, the new findings suggest that ketone bodies are not responsible for this protective effect.
“Given how much attention has been paid to ketone bodies like BHB, both as a commercial health trend and in recent high-profile studies suggesting BHB suppresses colon cancer, we fully expected them to be the direct drivers. Instead, our experiments in genetically engineered mice revealed that these molecules are essentially metabolic bystanders. The real surprise is that tumor acceleration is driven entirely by how stem cells process and burn the heavy influx of dietary fat itself,” Yilmaz says.
The researchers now hope to further study why ketogenic diets have such different effects in the colon and the small intestine. As ketogenic diets continue to gain popularity, understanding these tissue-specific effects will be critical for guiding their use, the researchers say.
The findings carry practical implications. Because the diet’s effects—both the tumor acceleration in the small intestine and the protection in the colon—are driven entirely by fat metabolism rather than the ketones themselves, commercial ketone supplements or drinks would not be expected to mimic either the risks or the benefits discovered in this study. This may be especially relevant given that small intestinal tumors have been rising in incidence in recent decades, with the greatest impact on patients with inherited conditions that predispose them to intestinal cancer, such as familial adenomatous polyposis.
The post Ketogenic Diet Shows Opposite Effects on Cancer Risk in Mouse Small Intestine and Colon appeared first on GEN – Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology News.
Parkinson’s Drug Candidate Enhances Levodopa Therapy While Reducing Side Effects
Scientists have identified a compound that could improve the benefits of levodopa treatment for patients with Parkinson’s disease while delaying or preventing side effects that commonly develop with long-term use. The discovery was made at Sinopia Biosciences, a spinout of the University of California San Diego that analyzes large biological datasets to identify novel therapeutic approaches for preventing and managing side effects of existing drugs.
Preclinical findings published today in Science Translational Medicine suggest the drug candidate could significantly enhance the performance of the most effective and widely used treatment for Parkinson’s. If confirmed in clinical trials, the approach could represent a major advancement in the treatment of this increasingly prevalent neurodegenerative condition.
Levodopa can dramatically improve Parkinson’s symptoms, especially during the early stages of the disease. Over time, however, its effects start wearing off between doses, and within five years of treatment, about 40% of patients develop dyskinesia—a complication involving erratic and involuntary movements. Amantadine is currently the only approved drug to treat dyskinesia induced by levodopa, but its psychiatric and vascular side effects significantly limit its use.
“Virtually every Parkinson’s patient takes levodopa,” said Aarash Bordbar, PhD, chief executive officer, chief scientific officer and co-founder of Sinopia Biosciences. “But patients face two major problems with the drug: the reappearance of Parkinson’s symptoms and dyskinesia. There is no drug that can be added to levodopa to address both simultaneously in a robust manner, and that’s what our drug candidate is doing.”
Bordbar’s team analyzed transcriptomics data to understand how levodopa changes gene expression patterns in the striatum, a brain region involved in movement control. The results were compared with a dataset of gene expression changes induced by existing drugs, allowing the researchers to identify compounds that activated the same transcriptional programs responsible for levodopa’s motor benefits while opposing gene expression programs linked to dyskinesia side effects.
“Maximizing clinical benefits of therapeutics while minimizing adverse effects is a central challenge in drug development,” said Bordbar. “By focusing on the pharmacology of an effective drug rather than disease biology alone, the approach prioritizes pathways with demonstrated clinical relevance, increasing translational potential.”
The team identified a promising candidate in trapidil, a drug that has been used for over 50 years in Japan to treat angina. The drug targets PKA-III, a protein involved in movement and dopamine responses within the brain. The researchers then designed a new compound based on trapidil and tested it in mouse and macaque models of Parkinson’s disease.
Results showed that the drug candidate could offer a dual benefit to Parkinson’s patients, simultaneously improving the motor benefits of levodopa while delaying or preventing treatment-related complications—potentially benefiting both long-term users and patients who are newly starting levodopa therapy.
Based on these findings, Bordbar believes there’s a high chance Sinopia’s drug candidate will succeed in clinical trials. This is further supported by the fact the compound is based on a drug that has been safely used for decades. The company is currently completing the toxicology studies required ahead of the first-in-human clinical trial, which is expected to begin next year.
The post Parkinson’s Drug Candidate Enhances Levodopa Therapy While Reducing Side Effects appeared first on Inside Precision Medicine.
Weekly Digital Symptom Check-Ins Improve Outcomes for Cancer Patients
A study by the Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology has shown that completing a simple weekly electronic symptom check-in significantly improves quality of life and may reduce health disparities among people undergoing treatment for advanced cancer.
The PRO-TECT study, which is published in JCO Oncology Practice, showed that the biggest improvements occurred among patient groups that have historically faced greater symptom burden or barriers to effective communication with their care team, including Black patients, women, younger patients, and individuals with less formal education.
“Although we know from prior work that systematic symptom monitoring improves quality-of-life outcomes in patients with advanced cancer, the current analysis extends these findings by suggesting that some groups may experience greater benefit,” said first author Allison Deal, MS, a senior biostatistician at the UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center.
Study chair Ethan Basch, MD, who is also from the UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center explained that the use of remote symptom monitoring using patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in cancer care in increasing across the U.S., with more than 80 health systems and large practices currently implementing this approach. However, he added that “this is still an early time for this patient-centered approach to monitoring patients, and many practices are still learning how best to implement at their own sites.”
For the PRO-TECT study, 1191 adult patients with metastatic solid tumors receiving systemic therapy were randomly assigned to complete weekly electronic symptom monitoring (n=593) or usual care (n=598) for up to one year.
The weekly surveys included questions about symptoms from the National Cancer Institute’s PRO version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) item library, oral intake, patient-reported performance status, and falls. The surveys took a few minutes to complete and patients could choose whether to complete them online (64%) or via telephone-based interactive voice response not requiring Internet access (36%).
If the answers passed a prespecified threshold (i.e., severity or worsening from previous assessment), the participant was sent a link to relevant patient-level materials for self-management of the reported symptom, and a nurse on the participant’s clinical care team was sent an automated email alert.
The researchers report that, during the study, 90% of surveys were completed and 41% of reports triggered an alert.
At three months, participants in the PRO arm had a mean 2.37-point improvement, from a baseline of 77.0 points, in the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 symptom control score, and a mean 1.54-point improvement, from a baseline of 73.9 points, in physical function score.
By comparison, participants given usual care reported a 0.20- and 0.93-point decline in symptom control and physical function, respectively.
Basch noted that the differences between the two arms were statistically significant and clinically meaningful, adding that there were also “substantial delays until symptom worsening” among people in the PRO arm relative to the usual care arm.
Deal and co-investigators also observed significant differences in outcome by race, education level, age, and sex.
Specifically, they found that the improvement in symptom control in the PRO arm was significantly larger in Black patients than in White patients, which essentially erased a baseline gap and brought symptom control among Black patients on par with that among patients by month 3. Black patients were also much more likely to report that the weekly surveys made them feel more in control of their own care and improved conversations with their care team.
Patients with a high school education or less who used the weekly surveys had significantly greater improvements in both symptom control and physical function than those with a college education. They also had higher rates of triggered alerts and reported that the weekly questions felt relevant to their daily lives.
Women and younger patients (<65 years), two groups that traditionally report higher distress and more severe side effects during cancer treatment, experienced substantial quality-of-life gains from the weekly check-ins compared with the usual care group, whereas men and older patients saw no significant improvement relative to usual care.
In addition, the weekly reporting tool was associated with significantly reduced or delayed emergency department visits for patients, which are known to cause financial and emotional stress for patients and their families.
“Our results suggest that remote monitoring may provide underserved cancer patients with a new avenue to communicate concerns that might go underrecognized in routine practice,” Basch told Inside Precision Medicine. “Broad implementation of these systems may represent an effective and highly practical strategy to advance health equity. Future studies should test technology with more general patient audiences.”
He added: “There is a follow-up initiative to this trial called OncoPRO which is supporting health systems across the country as they work to onboard these systems.”
The post Weekly Digital Symptom Check-Ins Improve Outcomes for Cancer Patients appeared first on Inside Precision Medicine.

